Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.50s
Ricky A. LeVa v. Department of Homeland Security
Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 17, 2014
Brown v. Department of Defense, 2014 MSPB 74, ¶ 13. … See Munoz v. Department of Homeland Security, 121 M.S.P.R. 483, ¶ 15 (2014) (loss of a required security clearance); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedGregory Einboden v. Department of the Navy
2015 MSPB 26 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 27, 2015
The Board has recognized that something more than a mere possibility is required to meet the efficiency of the service standard. In Lara v. … Similarly, the Board in In re Tinker AFSC/DP v.
Cited 2 timesPublished72 T.C. 646 · United States Tax Court · Jul 9, 1979
Nevin v. Salk, supra; Cadigan v. American Trust Co., supra. Whether the several writings comprise one transaction is a question of fact. Nevin v. Salk, supra. … Estate of Woodworth v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 193, 196 (1966). See United States v. Provident Trust Co., 291 U.S. 272 (1934).
Cited 20 timesPublishedR. Neumann & Co. v. Overseas Shipments, Inc., Seton Leather Co. v. Overseas Shipments, Inc.
326 F.2d 786 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 23, 1964
Singer Manufacturing Co. et al. v. Birginal-Bigsby Corp., 319 F.2d 273 , 50 CCPA 1380. We think that the reasoning applied by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in two more recently decided cases is apposite here. … Gallun & Sons Corp. v. Aristocrat Leather.
Cited 11 timesPublishedJohn E. Burke v. Department of Veterans Affairs
2014 MSPB 48 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 23, 2014
See Mullins v. … See Bables v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 27, 2026
Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)). Moreover, the Court presumes that a board’s actions are valid and performed “according to the regulations and considered all of [plaintiff’s] records.” Melendez Camilo v. … See TServe Alliance, Inc. v. United States, 122 F.4th 1364, 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2024) (quoting Keene Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished34 B.T.A. 280 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 7, 1936
Helvering v. Butterworth, 290 U. S. 365 . … He explains that prior to the decision of the Supreme Court in Hel-ver ing v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2014
As to VA's duty to assist, the Board finds that all necessary development has been accomplished, and therefore appellate review may proceed without prejudice to the Veteran. See Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. … See Soyini v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 540, 546 (1991); Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 426, 430 (1994).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedArthur Liebscher v. Wilson P. Boothroyd
258 F.2d 948 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 1, 1958
Sweetland v. Don Cole, 19 C.C.P.A.(Patents) 751, 53 F.2d 709 , 11 U.S.Pat.Q. 174; William E. Moore v. Albert E. Greene, 18 C.C.P.A. … Furthermore, we find nothing in Bocciarelli v. Huffman, supra, cited by the board, which is inconsistent with the position wTe have taken.
Cited 15 timesPublishedDepartment of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Feb 23, 2010
school board and lacked a substantial interest in county school board elections); Hogencamp v. … City v. Morris, 489 U.S. 688, 701- 02 & n.9 (1989); Brown v. Thomson, 462 U.S. 835, 842-43 (1983).
Cited 0 timesPublished41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,003 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 1996
Blakeslee & Sons, Inc. v. … Westerhold v. United States, 28 Fed.Cl. 172, 174 (1993). See Beauchamp Constr. Co. v.
Cited 32 timesPublishedApplication of George J. Handel, Jr
312 F.2d 943 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 13, 1963
Parker & Whipple Company v. Yale Clock Company, 123 U.S. 87 , 8 S.Ct. 38 , 31 L.Ed. 100 ; 41 OG 811; 1887 CD 584. … The cases relied on by the board, United States Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corporation, 315 U.S. 668 , 62 S.Ct. 839 , 86 L.Ed. 1105 , and Parker and Whipple Company v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedNational Movers Co. Inc. v. The United States
386 F.2d 999 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 9, 1967
Thus, the factual findings of the Board are final and conclusive, unless shown to be arbitrary, capricious and unsupported by the evidence. Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. § 321 ; United States v. … (Board Decision p. 7, para. 2.) This fact is significant in light of plaintiff’s burden in a breach of contract case to demonstrate its willingness and ability to perform. See, United States v. Penn Foundry & Mfg.
Cited 11 timesPublishedSandra K. Miller v. Office of Personnel Management
2015 MSPB 63 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 16, 2015
Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 759 F.2d 9, 10 (Fed. Cir. 1985). … v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHenry E. Wile Company v. United States
169 F. Supp. 249 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1959
United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co., 328 U.S. 234 , 66 S.Ct. 1000 , 90 L.Ed. 1192 ; United States v. Blair, 321 U.S. 730 , 64 S.Ct. 820 , 88 L.Ed. 1039 ; United States v. … Callahan Walker Construction Co., 317 U.S. 56 , 63 S.Ct. 113 , 87 L.Ed. 49 ; Pyle v. United States, Ct.Cl., 163 F.Supp. 853 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedApplication of Beatrice Foods Co. Application of Fairway Foods, Inc
429 F.2d 466 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 6, 1970
In so holding, the board indicated that it was following what it considered to be the ruling of the court in Coastal Chemical Co. v. … Flintkote Co. v.
Cited 50 timesPublished10 B.T.A. 497 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 2, 1928
LACKEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Lackey v. Commissioner Docket No. 8495. … Brown and L. R.
Cited 0 timesPublished102 T.C. 116 · United States Tax Court · Feb 2, 1994
Commissioner, 981 F.2d 776 (5th Cir. 1993), revg. and remanding 93 T.C. 694 (1989), and Brown v. United States, 890 F.2d 1329 (5th Cir. 1989). … We find relevant the following statement by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Brown v.
Reversed in part, on other grounds by Robinson v. Commissioner, 70 F.3d 34 (1995)Cited 166 timesPublishedApplication of Sanford C. Lyons
364 F.2d 1005 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 6, 1966
For the foregoing reasons the decision of the board is affirmed. Affirmed. *1018 *1019 . The other references are: . … V, Clay (Kaolin), (1958) p. 69, published by the Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. .
Cited 3 timesPublishedRichard Bruhn v. Department of Agriculture
2016 MSPB 42 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 22, 2016
Ferdon v. U.S. … See Fisher v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna