Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.72s
1 Vet. App. 589 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 26, 1991
Payne v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 85, 87 (1990); see also Peyton v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 282, 285-87 (1991); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). … See Lehman v. Der- *596 winski, 1 Vet.App. 339 (1991); Swan v. Derwinski, U.S.Vet.App. No. 89-75 (order, Apr. 12, 1991).
Cited 742 timesPublished71 T.C. 568 · United States Tax Court · Jan 16, 1979
In Furner v. … Grover v. Commissioner, 68 T.C. 598, 601 (1977); Davis v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 1014, 1019 (1976); Glenn v. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 270, 275 (1974); Weiszmann v.
Cited 37 timesPublished119 F. Supp. 421 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 2, 1954
The Tax Court of the United States in Scarce v. Commissioner, 17 T.C. 830 , and in Elmer D. Pangburn, 13 T.C. 169 , seems to have taken a similar view. … See also Allen v. Spencer, D.C.Cir., 192 F.2d 477 .
Cited 24 timesPublishedStephen W. Gingery v. Department of Defense
2014 MSPB 59 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 28, 2014
See Vigil v. … See Dow v.
Cited 1 timesPublished166 Ct. Cl. 540 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1964
See, e.g., Robinson v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 235 (1963); Merriott v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 261 (1963); Teitelbaum v. … But, as the Court of Claims stated in Friedman v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedShared, LLC v. SharedSpaceofAtlanta, LLC
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Dec 21, 2017
See Media Online Inc. v. El Clasificado Inc., 88 USPQ2d 1285, 1288 (TTAB 2008); see also 5C C. Wright & A. Miller, Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. § 1369 (3d ed. 2017). … See Blansett Pharmacal Co. v. Camrick Labs. Inc., 25 USPQ2d 1473 (TTAB 1992); Von Schorlemer v. Baron Herm. Schorlemer Weinkellerei GmbH, 5 USPQ2d 1376 (TTAB 1986); La Maur, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2014
Green v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 121 (1991); Caffrey v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 377 (1994). … Friscia v. Brown, 7 Vet.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLykes Bros. Steamship Co. v. United States
459 F.2d 1393 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1972
In Boeing Co. v. Renegotiation Board, 325 F. 2d 885 (9th Cir.1963), and Consolidated-Hammer Dry Plate and Film Co. v. … Co. v.
Cited 38 timesPublishedFifth Generation Inc. v. Titomirov Vodka LLC
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Oct 31, 2019
Cir. 2011) (affirming Board’s entry of judgment as a discovery sanction for repeated failures to comply with Board’s reasonable orders), aff’g 96 USPQ2d 1134 (TTAB 2010); MHW Ltd. v. … Benedict’s repeated failures to comply” with Board procedures and orders); SFM, LLC v.
Cited 0 timesPublished529 F.2d 531 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 1, 1975
Doggett v. United States, ante at 478; Cooper v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 300 (1973); Abruzzo v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 731 , 513 F. 2d 608 (1975). … See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 719 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 (1975); and Jankovic v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 807 (1974).
Cited 1 timesPublished27 I. & N. Dec. 189 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2018
Vargas, Esquire, Houston, Texas FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Peter Gannon, Associate Legal Advisor BEFORE: Board Panel: MALPHRUS, MULLANE, and LIEBOWITZ, Board Members. … Mukasey, 519 F.3d 436, 440–41 (8th Cir. 2008) (holding that the Board, as an appellate body, has discretionary authority to refuse to consider arguments not raised below); Torres de la Cruz v.
Cited 135 timesPublishedGregory Lumber Co. v. United States
29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,132 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 8, 1982
See Tuttle/White Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 364 , 359, 656 F.2d 644, 646-47 (1981). … Tuttle/White Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 354 , 656 F.2d 644 (July 29, 1981), was quite different.
Cited 23 timesPublishedDerek J. Morris v. Department of the Navy
2016 MSPB 37 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 31, 2016
. ¶13 Litigants before the Board are expected to comply with all orders issued by the Board and to comply with the Board’s regulations. See Mendoza v. … And, in Fleming v.
Cited 1 timesPublished2 Vet. App. 359 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 22, 1992
We therefore vacate the Board decision, retain jurisdiction, and remand the case to the Board for further adjudication. See Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990). I. BACKGROUND Burt L. … Manio v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 140, 145 (1991); see also 38 U.S.C. § 5108 (formerly § 3008). The BVA may not disregard the issues a veteran raises in his appeal. See Smith v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 137, 141 (1992).
Cited 4 timesPublishedKeith E. Brown v. Department of Defense
Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 22, 2016
BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, SF-0752-13-0336-C-2 v. … Russo v. Veterans Administration, 3 M.S.P.R. 345, 349 (1980).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished24 I. & N. Dec. 22 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2006
Cooper, Esquire, Davis, California BEFORE: Board Panel: FILPPU and PAULEY, Board Members; O’LEARY, Temporary Board Member PAULEY, Board Member: In a decision dated December 21, 2005, an Immigration Judge found … Arenas-Yepes v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 19, 2018
Brown Park Estates- Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1997). … Dalles Irrigation Dist. v. United States, 71 Fed. Cl. 344, 351 (2006) (quoting Brown Park, 127 F.3d at 1457).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBaltimore Transfer Co. v. Commissioner
8 T.C. 1 · United States Tax Court · Jan 3, 1947
United States v. Anderson, 269 U. S. 422 , 46 S. Ct 131 , 70 L. Ed. 347 ; Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Commissioner, 320 U. S. 516 , 64 S. Ct. 364 ; Security Flour Mills Co. v. Commissioner, 321 U. S. 281 , 64 S. … See also Dougherty's Sons Inc. v. Commissioner, 121 Fed. (2d) 700, 702, quoting from Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank, 308 U. S. 371, 374 .
Cited 31 timesPublishedStephen M. Rodgers v. Department of the Navy
2015 MSPB 45 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 23, 2015
See Putnam v. … An administrative judge has broad discretion in ruling on discovery matters, and absent an abuse of discretion the Board will not find reversible error in such rulings. Vaughn v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 27, 2025
The Board reasoned that Dr. Foote’s opinion was not supported by objective evidence. Id. V. … Melendez Camilo v. United States, 642 F.3d 1040, 1044 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (quoting Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1983)); see also Chappell v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna