The opinion
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
THIS ORDER IS A P.O. Box 1451
PRECEDENT OF THE Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
TTAB General Contact Number: 571-272-8500
KWM Mailed: December 21, 2017
Opposition No. 91228478
Shared, LLC
v.
SharedSpaceofAtlanta, LLC
Before Cataldo, Mermelstein, and Hightower,
Administrative Trademark Judges.
By the Board:
On August 19, 2017, Opposer/Counterclaim Respondent (“Opposer”) filed a motion
for judgment on the pleadings with respect to the counterclaims of
Applicant/Counterclaim Petitioner (“Applicant”). 11 TTABVUE. The motion is fully
briefed.
A motion for judgment on the pleadings, as with a motion for summary judgment,
is a pretrial device intended to save the time and expense of a full trial when a party
is able to demonstrate, prior to trial, that there is no genuine dispute of material fact
to be resolved, and the moving party is entitled to judgment on the substantive merits
of the controversy as a matter of law. See Media Online Inc. v. El Clasificado Inc., 88
USPQ2d 1285, 1288 (TTAB 2008); see also 5C C. Wright & A. Miller, Fed. Prac. &
Proc. Civ. § 1369 (3d ed. 2017).
Opposition No. 91228478
A motion for judgment on the pleadings should be filed “[a]fter the pleadings are
closed, but within such time as not to delay the trial.” TBMP § 504.01 (June 2017);
see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) (party may move for judgment on the pleadings “early
enough not to delay trial”). The Board’s established practice has been to apply to
motions for judgment on the pleadings the same deadline applicable to motions for
summary judgment set forth in Trademark Rule 2.127(e)(1), 37 C.F.R. § 2.127(e)(1).
See, e.g., TBMP § 504 (1st ed. 1995) (a motion for judgment on the pleadings “must
be filed after the pleadings are closed, but prior to the opening of the first testimony
period, as originally set or as reset,” inasmuch as the trial period commences with the
opening of the first testimony period) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c); and prior rules
Trademark Rule 2.116(e), 37 C.F.R. § 2.116(e); Trademark Rule 2.127(e)(1), 37 C.F.R.
§ 2.127(e)(1)).
Before January 14, 2017, the deadline for filing a motion for summary judgment,
as set forth in Trademark Rule 2.127(e)(1), was “prior to the commencement of the
first testimony period, as originally set or as reset.” See Blansett Pharmacal Co. v.
Camrick Labs. Inc., 25 USPQ2d 1473 (TTAB 1992); Von Schorlemer v. Baron Herm.
Schorlemer Weinkellerei GmbH, 5 USPQ2d 1376 (TTAB 1986); La Maur, Inc. v.
Bagwells Enters., Inc., 193 USPQ 234 (Comm’r 1976); TBMP § 504.01 (2016).
Trademark Rule 2.127(e)(1) was amended, effective January 14, 2017, and clarified
on July 21, 2017, to provide that a motion for summary judgment “must be filed before
the day of the deadline for pretrial disclosures for the first testimony period, as
originally set or as reset.” See Miscellaneous Changes to Trademark Trial and Appeal
2
Opposition No. 91228478
Board Rules, 81 Fed. Reg. 69,950, 69,967 (October 7, 2016) (Notice of Final
Rulemaking) and 82 Fed. Reg. 33,804 (July 21, 2017) (Notice of Final Rulemaking
Clarification); Trademark Rule 2.127(e)(1); TBMP § 528.02 (June 2017). In keeping
with Board practice, a motion for judgment on the pleadings must also be filed before
the day of the deadline for pretrial disclosures for the first testimony period, as
originally set or as reset.
Here, the deadline for Opposer’s pretrial disclosures, as reset in the Board’s July
26, 2017 order, was August 7, 2017. Opposer’s motion filed August 19, 2017 is
untimely and is therefore denied.
Proceedings are resumed. The Board, in its discretion, allows Opposer until
January 3, 2018 in which to serve its pretrial disclosures, if it has not already done
so.1 Remaining trial dates are reset as follows:
Plaintiff's Pretrial Disclosures Due January 3, 2018
Plaintiff's 30-day Trial Period Ends February 17, 2018
Defendant's Pretrial Disclosures Due March 4, 2018
Defendant's 30-day Trial Period Ends April 18, 2018
Plaintiff's Rebuttal Disclosures Due May 3, 2018
Plaintiff's 15-day Rebuttal Period Ends June 2, 2018
BRIEFS SHALL BE DUE AS FOLLOWS:
Plaintiff's Main Brief Due August 1, 2018
Defendant's Main Brief Due August 31, 2018
Plaintiff's Reply Brief Due September 15, 2018
1 Because the August 7, 2017 deadline for pretrial disclosures, as previously reset by Board
order dated July 26, 2017, has already passed, the parties are precluded from filing any
further motions for summary judgment, motions for judgment on the pleadings, or motions
to compel in this proceeding even though the Board, by this order, has provided Opposer until
January 3, 2018 to serve its pretrial disclosures on Applicant, in the event it has not already
done so.
3
Opposition No. 91228478
Generally, the Federal Rules of Evidence apply to Board trials. Trial testimony is
taken and introduced out of the presence of the Board during the assigned testimony
periods. The parties may stipulate to a wide variety of matters, and many
requirements relevant to the trial phase of Board proceedings are set forth in
Trademark Rules 2.121 through 2.125. These include pretrial disclosures, matters in
evidence, the manner and timing of taking testimony, and the procedures for
submitting and serving testimony and other evidence, including affidavits,
declarations, deposition transcripts and stipulated evidence. Trial briefs shall be
submitted in accordance with Trademark Rules 2.128(a) and (b), 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.128(a)
and (b). Oral argument at final hearing will be scheduled only upon the timely
submission of a separate notice as allowed by Trademark Rule 2.129(a), 37 C.F.R.
§ 2.129(a).
4