Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

2.33s

  • Advanced Tech. & Materials Co., Ltd v. United States

    885 F. Supp. 2d 1343 · United States Court of International Trade · Nov 30, 2012

    Steel Corp. v. United States, 621 F.3d 1351, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2010), citing Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477 (1951). See Charles H. Koch, Jr., 3 Admin. L. & Prac. § 9:24 (3d ed.) … See id. at Ex. 4, p.48; id. at Ex. 2 (Footnotes, Section V.27 and XI.3). Cf.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cerullo v. Derwinski

    1 Vet. App. 195 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 4, 1991

    Section 4003(a) of title 38 formerly stated that the “determination of the section [of the Board] ... shall be the final determination of the Board, except that the Board on its own motion may correct an obvious error in … See also First Nat’l Bank of Salem, Ohio v. Hirsch, 535 F.2d 343, 345 (6th Cir.1976); Ferrell v. Trailmobile, Inc., 223 F.2d 697, 698 (7th Cir.1955); Corning Glass Works v.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • 11- 02 928

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

    Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. … As to VA's duty to assist, the Board finds that all necessary development has been accomplished, and therefore appellate review may proceed without prejudice to the appellant. See Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kuttroff v. United States

    13 Ct. Cust. 17 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 20, 1925

    .— Wolff v. … In United States v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Rowe v. United States

    167 Ct. Cl. 468 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1964

    Murray v. United States, 154 Ct. Cl. 185, 191 (1961); Smith v. United States, 155 Ct. Cl. 682, 691 (1961); Clackum v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 34, 36 (1963). … Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363, 388 (1957); Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535, 539-540 (1959); Murray v. United States, supra, at p. 191; Smith v. United States, supra, at p. 691.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Stahl v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 30, 2025

    See Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d 1295, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (citing Chappell v. … (quoting SEC v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bessenyey v. Commissioner

    45 T.C. 261 · United States Tax Court · Dec 17, 1965

    Interests in the property subsequently devolved to petitioner (6/16ths, from the estate of her mother), Marcus Daly III (4/16ths), Frances Carroll Brown (3/16ths), and Margaret Brown Trimble (3/16ths). … Corp. v. United States, 311 F. 2d 235 (Ct.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Nielsen-Dillingham Builders, J.V. v. United States

    43 Fed. Cl. 5 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 6, 1999

    Plaintiff appealed the decision to the VA Board of Contract Appeals. … Co. v. United States, 962 F.2d 998, 1003 (Fed.Cir.1992). Each part of a contract must be read together and harmonized, if at all possible. See T. Brown Constructors, Inc. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Estate of Porter v. Commissioner

    54 T.C. 1066 · United States Tax Court · May 25, 1970

    Edgeworth Company v. Wetherbee, 6 Gray (Mass.) 166 , and Choate v. Board of Assessors of the City of Boston, 304 Mass. 298 , 23 N.E. 2d 882, 886 (1939). … McMahon v. Brown, 219 Mass. 23 , 106 N.E. 576 (1914).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Searle v. Glarum

    179 F.2d 974 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 2, 1950

    In support of the holding last described, the board cited the decisions of this and other courts in the cases of Bain-bridge v. Walton, 104 F.2d 808 , 26 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1417; Electro-Metallurgical Company et al. v. … See Senkus v. Johnston, 166 F.2d 597 , 35 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1008. See also Thurston v. Wulff et al., 164 F.2d 612 , 35 C.C.P.A., Patents, 794.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Pierce Oil Corp. v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 403 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 17, 1935

    The case is controlled in principle by Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U. S. 445 ; North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet, 286 U. S. 417 ; Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 ; Pharr v. Commissioner, 56 Fed. (2d) 832. … Brown v. Helvering, supra.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • United States v. Eytinge

    4 Ct. Cust. 266 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 23, 1913

    decision of the board, which is reported as Abstract 29504 (T. … The appellees in' support of their several contentions especially cite United States v. Herrmann ( 145 Fed., 843 ); same case ( 154 Fed., 196 ); and also Vandegrift v. United States ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 219 ; T.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kast v. Commissioner

    78 T.C. 1154 · United States Tax Court · Jun 29, 1982

    The District Court in Brown v. United States, 292 F. Supp. 527 (D. … Ohio 1974), stated that the taxpayer had cited the case of Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Asustek Computer Incorporation v. Chengdu Westhouse Interactive Entertainment Co., Ltd.

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Oct 31, 2018

    Estudi Moline Dissey, S.L. v. … See Blansett Pharmacal Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • General Sec. Co. v. Commissioner

    38 B.T.A. 330 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 16, 1938

    Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U. S. 465 ; Helvering v. Brown, 85 Fed. (2d) 926; Sawtell v. Commissioner, 82 Fed. (2d) 221; A. S. Eldridge, 30 B. T. … Heiner v. Crosby, 24 Fed. (2d) 191; Houghton v. Commissioner, 71 Fed. (2d) 656, 658; Laird v. Commissioner, 85 Fed. (2d) 598, 599; Jenkins v. Smith, 21 Fed. Supp. 251.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sufi Network Services, Inc. v. United States

    122 Fed. Cl. 257 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 21, 2015

    The additional Board proceedings resulted from the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in SUFI Network Services, Inc. v. United States, 755 F.3d 1305 (Fed. … In 1951, the Supreme Court decided United States v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Special Counsel ex rel. Judy Kachanes v. Department of Agriculture

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 3, 2014

    JUDY KACHANES, CB-1208-14-0021-U-2 Petitioner, v. … THIS STAY ORDER IS NONPRECEDENTIAL ∗ Peta-Gay Irving Brown, Esquire, Oakland, California, for the petitioner.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lykes-Youngstown Corporation v. The United States

    420 F.2d 735 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 23, 1970

    This court stated in Cresswell v. … See also The Franklin Co. v. United States, 381 F.2d 416 , 180 Ct.Cl. 666 (1967) ; City of Memphis, Tenn., etc. *744 v. Ford Motor Co., 304 F.2d 845, 849 (6th Cir. 1962).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United Contractors, a Co-Partnership Consisting of James E. Ward, Elkin Morris and Andrew J. Dickies v. The United States

    368 F.2d 585 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 14, 1966

    Co. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 368 F.2d 847, 851 , and we consider the argument. In Nager Elec. Co. v. … Ragonese v.

    Cited 73 timesPublished
  • Lawrence Little, Jr. v. United States Postal Service

    2017 MSPB 5 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 6, 2017

    See Hamilton v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 75 F.3d 639, 646-47 & n.9 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Saddler v. Department of the Army, 68 F.3d 1357, 1358-59 (Fed. Cir. 1995); Cody v. … See generally Rocha v. Merit Systems Protection Board & Department of State, 688 F.3d 1307 (Fed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.