Opinion

Special Counsel ex rel. Judy Kachanes v. Department of Agriculture

Court
Merit Systems Protection Board
Filed
Sep 3, 2014
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

SPECIAL COUNSEL DOCKET NUMBER

EX REL. JUDY KACHANES, CB-1208-14-0021-U-2

Petitioner,

v.

DATE: September 3, 2014

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Agency.

THIS STAY ORDER IS NONPRECEDENTIAL ∗

Peta-Gay Irving Brown, Esquire, Oakland, California, for the petitioner.

Britt Stuart, Washington, D.C., for the agency.

BEFORE

Susan Tsui Grundmann, Chairman

Anne M. Wagner, Vice Chairman

Mark A. Robbins, Member

ORDER ON STAY TERMINATION REQUEST

¶1 Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 1214(b)(1)(D), the Office of Special Counsel (OSC)

requests a termination of the initial stay of the indefinite detail, proposed

removal, and constructive removal of Judy Kachanes from her position as a

consumer safety inspector with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. For the

∗

A nonprecedential order is one that the Board has determined does not add

significantly to the body of MSPB case law. Parties may cite nonprecedential orders,

but such orders have no precedential value; the Board and administrative judges are not

required to follow or distinguish them in any future decisions. In contrast, a

precedential decision issued as an Opinion and Order has been identified by the Board

as significantly contributing to the Board's case law. See 5 C.F.R. § 1201.117(c).

2

reasons set forth below, OSC’s request is GRANTED, and the August 20, 2014

stay is TERMINATED.

¶2 On August 20, 2014, Chairman Grundmann granted OSC’s request for a

45-day stay of the indefinite detail, proposed removal, and constructive removal

of Ms. Kachanes. The Department of Agriculture was ordered to reinstate Ms.

Kachanes to her position of record, with the same duties and responsibilities that

she formerly had, effective August 20, 2014. On August 25, 2014, the

Department of Agriculture requested modification of the stay order based in part

on Ms. Kachanes’s representation that she was unable to work because of her

disability. It further noted that Ms. Kachanes was receiving Social Security

disability benefits and had a pending application for disability retirement through

the Federal Employees’ Retirement System.

¶3 On August 27, 2014, OSC filed a motion requesting a termination without

prejudice of the August 20, 2014 order granting the stay, stating that the parties

desired to resolve the matter without the reinstatement of Ms. Kachanes to her

former position. OSC also requested that the Department of Agriculture be

released from its obligation to submit proof of Ms. Kachanes’s reinstatement

pursuant to the initial stay order. Consistent with 5 U.S.C. § 1214(b)(1)(D)(ii),

OSC provided Ms. Kachanes with notice and an opportunity for comments prior

to requesting termination of the stay. Both Ms. Kachanes and the Department of

Agriculture consented to OSC’s motion to terminate the stay.

¶4 Based on the foregoing, the August 20, 2014 stay is hereby terminated

without prejudice effective the date of the issuance of this Order. Further,

pursuant to the request of the parties, the Department of Agriculture is hereby

3

released from its obligation to submit proof of its compliance with the August 20,

2014 initial stay order.

FOR THE BOARD: ______________________________

William D. Spencer

Clerk of the Board

Washington, D.C.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.