Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.77s
Louis Wolf & Co. v. United States
15 Cust. Ct. 156 · United States Customs Court · Nov 9, 1945
Referring to United States v. … Such a substantial change in language imports a change of meaning (United States v. American Brown Boveri Electric Corp., 17 C. C. P. A. 329, T. D. 43776).
Cited 11 timesPublished35 B.T.A. 551 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 2, 1937
See John Crosby Brown, 27 B. T. A. 176, 182; Squier v. Commissioner, supra. The petitioner cites C. W. Deeds, 14 B. T. A. 1140; Henry W. Cushman, 13 B. T. A. 41; Edward J. Slater, 12 B. T. … See United States v. Mitchell, 271 U. S. 9 .
Cited 21 timesPublishedECC International Constructors, LLC
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Apr 18, 2025
Co. v. United States, 92 Fed. … Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., ASBCA Nos. 59385, 59744, 20-1 BCA ¶ 37,656 at 182,827. Rather, section 3.9.2 speaks in precise terms. Thomas Jefferson Univ. Hosp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished36 T.C. 395 · United States Tax Court · May 25, 1961
Relying on United States v. Brown, 86 F. 2d 798 (C.A. 6), and Vestal v. … Holt, 348 Mo. 982 , 156 S.W. 2d 708 ; Brown v. Essig, 1 S.W. 2d 855 .
Cited 32 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 5, 2015
See Kelly v. Brown, 7 Vet. … See Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518, 519 (1996); see also Fagan v. Shinseki, 573 F.3d 1282, 1289 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedWeider Publications, LLC v. D & D Beauty Care Company, LLC
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 21, 2014
Lacoste Alligator S.A. v. … Ray Brown, Opposition No. 91118342 (TTAB 2003) where the Board found no relationship between opposer’s GQ magazine and applicant’s GQ NAILS for nail salon ser- vices on the basis that the primary readers
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 30, 2014
See Libertine v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 521, 522-23 (1996). See also Reeves, supra. … See also Harvey v. Brown, 6 Vet.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTrademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 24, 2022
Sarda King Ltd., 2019 USPQ2d 149090, at *6 (TTAB 2019) (the Board considers the factual situation at the time of trial). Cf. Grote Indus., Inc. v. … The Board in Kasco observed: Moreover, the record in [Kasco Corp. v. Southern Saw Serv.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTrademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 24, 2022
Sarda King Ltd., 2019 USPQ2d 149090, at *6 (TTAB 2019) (the Board considers the factual situation at the time of trial). Cf. Grote Indus., Inc. v. … The Board in Kasco observed: Moreover, the record in [Kasco Corp. v. Southern Saw Serv.
Cited 0 timesPublished158 F. Supp. 364 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1958
In Updike v. … United States, supra; San Millan v. United States, supra; Proper v. United States, supra.
Cited 33 timesPublished71 T.C. 727 · United States Tax Court · Feb 6, 1979
will of Hartford’s board of directors and management. … See Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 571 (1965).
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2015
The Board notes that the Veteran was previously represented by attorney Michael J. Brown, who withdrew his representation in March 2013. Mr. … REMAND The Board finds that a remand is required to obtain an adequate VA medical opinion that complies with the Board's prior remand. See Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303, 311 (2007); Stegall v. West, 11 Vet.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 31, 2012
The claims were remanded by the Board in October 2010 and March 2011. The claims have been returned to the Board for appellate review. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. … Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished26 Cl. Ct. 1119 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 11, 1992
In Beall v. … Brown 44. Larry D. Brown 45. 46. Melvin Brown, Jr. 47. Jerry W. Burns 48. Warren E. Burton 49. Richard S. Byrd 50. Francis B. Caddell 51. Terry L. Cain 52. 53. George B. Carpenter 54. Richard S. Carter 55. Donna S.
Cited 2 timesPublished22 C.C.P.A. 214 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 31, 1934
United States v. Acker, Merrill et al., 171 Fed. 77 , T.D. 29925. … This classification was sustained by the Board. The particular claim of the importer is not stated.
Cited 2 timesPublished27 I. & N. Dec. 509 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2019
See, e.g., Loughrin v. … In Jennings v.
Cited 49 timesPublished129 F. Supp. 958 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1955
The complaint finally rests upon the error, if any, of the Army Retiring Board made on December 12, 1945. Group v. United States, 125 Ct. Cl. 135 ; Thomas v. United States, 125 Ct.Cl. 76 . … Both parties cite the case of Uhley v. United States, 128 Ct.Cl. 608 .
Cited 18 timesPublishedArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 31, 2022
Corp. v. McHugh, 707 F.3d 1367, 1370 (Fed. … Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., ASBCA No. 56358 et al., 17-1 BCA ¶ 36,779 at 179,249.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014
See Evans v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 273, 282-3 (1996). … Brown, 35 F. 3d 1516 (Fed. Cir. 1994); Olson v. Brown, 5 Vet.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished152 F. Supp. 238 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1957
All of these cases followed our previous decisions in Rosnick v. United States, 129 F.Supp. 958 , 132 Ct.Cl. 1 ; Girault v. United States, 135 F.Supp. 521 , 133 Ct.Cl. 135 ; Duff v. … This justified the retiring board and the Secretary in entertaining his application made five months after his discharge. Cf. Updike v. United States, 132 F.Supp. 957 , 132 Ct.Cl. 627 ; Vaughn v.
Cited 35 timesPublished
Ask Donna