Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.57s
33 Fed. Cl. 438 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 11, 1995
That contractual theory has its clearest and *443 earliest expression in Heyer Products Co. v. United States, 140 F.Supp. 409 , 135 Ct.Cl. 63 (1956). … See Floyd v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 889, 891 (1992), aff'd, 996 F.2d 1237 (Fed.Cir.), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 328 , 126 L.Ed.2d 274 (1993).
Cited 5 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2015
Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 157 (1993). … Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 507 (1995); Libertine v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 521, 523-24 (1996).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished553 F.2d 104 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 27, 1977
The court concludes that in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court in United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976), and Brown v. … Allison v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 332 (1976); Morton v. United States, ante at 549.
Cited 14 timesPublishedRonald Moulton v. Office of Personnel Management
2023 MSPB 26 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 28, 2023
There is, however, no such proviso language in section 8467(a), and the Board will not supply such language in interpreting the statute. See, e.g., Crockett v. … ID at 16-21; see Thomas v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSeminole Nation v. United States
92 Ct. Cl. 210 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 7, 1940
Klamath Indians v. United States (No. E-346), 81 C. Cls. 79 ; 296 U. S. 244, 254, 255 . … There is no proof that the Council was misled as to any fact within the knowledge of Brown, or that Brown had knowledge of any material fact which was not known to the Council.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAbsorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United States
30 C.C.P.A. 24 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 15, 1942
See Borgfeldt v. United States, 124 Fed. 473 . … . * * * So, also, we think the reasoning in United States v. Brown & Co., 5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 212 , T. D. 34380, is applicable.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 T.C. 518 · United States Tax Court · Feb 2, 1943
Nor could it maintain that position under the law as declared in May v. Heiner , * * * The District Court for the Southern District of California in Brown v. United States , Fed. … The Board in the Hughes case did not assume the authority or have the temerity to overrule the decision of the Supreme Court in May v. Heiner . It did not essay to do so or think that it was doing so.
Cited 39 timesPublished3 Ct. Cust. 515 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 1, 1913
D. 28576, and on the case of United States v. Sheldon ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 485 ; T. D. 32245). … The board was not in error in so classifying it, and the decision is affirmed.
Cited 11 timesPublishedArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jan 15, 2025
Brown, Esq. … Coombs v. Beede, 36 A. 104, 105 (Me. 1896).
Cited 0 timesPublished13 B.T.A. 383 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 14, 1928
FLACH, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Flach v. Commissioner Docket No. 12809. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioner.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDepartment of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · May 6, 1982
Legal Status o f Transportation Remedies In Brown v. … Brown v. Board c f Education, 347 U .S. 483(1954).
Cited 0 timesPublishedB & W Wholesale Co. v. United States
63 Cust. Ct. 691 · United States Customs Court · Nov 3, 1969
I -don’t believe we take possession until it gets on board ship. … United States v. Wiener, 15 Ct. Cust. Appls. 428 , T.D. 42594 (1928).
Cited 6 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014
This matter is before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a May 2009 rating decision by the Regional Office (RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in Wichita, Kansas. … Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2015
See 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(a) (2013); Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995). … See generally Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498 (1995).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished110 Fed. Cl. 139 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 2, 2013
RESOURCES BY AND THROUGH ITS * v. … INTRODUCTION In its Opinion and Order, PG&E v. United States, 105 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished28 I. & N. Dec. 84 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Sep 24, 2020
See Dia v. … Abebe v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 1037, 1040 (9th Cir. 2005); see also, e.g., Bondarenko v. Holder, 733 F.3d 899, 906 (9th Cir. 2013); Gishta v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 972, 980 (6th Cir. 2005); Paripovic v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedDade Brothers, Inc. v. United States
163 Ct. Cl. 485 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1963
(Docket No. 63243, Hudson County Ct., Law Division); Bryant, et. al. v. Dade Bros., Inc., et al. (Docket No. L-1690-52, N.J. Super. Ct., Hudson County); and O'Brien, et al. v. Dade Bros., Inc., et al. (Docket No. … Kuzma v. Millinery Works, etc. Local 24, 27 N.J. Super. 579 (App. Div. 1953).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 30, 2015
In an October 2011 decision, the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board), in part, denied the first two issues listed above concerning claims for earlier effective dates. The Veteran appealed to the U.S. … Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLykes Bros. S.S. Co. v. Commissioner
42 B.T.A. 1395 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 29, 1940
-RIPLEY STEAMSHIP CO., INC.), PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Lykes Bros. S.S. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 96637. … BROWN On March 20, 1933, the Shipping Board made an amendatory agreement with the petitioner by which the requirement of a $300,000 bond in the original agreement was eliminated and the requirement that the Postmaster General
Cited 0 timesPublishedNikesha Williams v. Department of Defense
2023 MSPB 23 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 17, 2023
Hessami v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 979 F.3d 1362, 1369 (Fed. … Johnston v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 518 F.3d 905, 911 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (emphasis added) (quoting Reid v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 508 F.3d 674, 678 (Fed. Cir. 2007)).
Cited 15 timesPublished
Ask Donna