Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.57s

  • Pressman v. United States

    33 Fed. Cl. 438 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 11, 1995

    That contractual theory has its clearest and *443 earliest expression in Heyer Products Co. v. United States, 140 F.Supp. 409 , 135 Ct.Cl. 63 (1956). … See Floyd v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 889, 891 (1992), aff'd, 996 F.2d 1237 (Fed.Cir.), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 328 , 126 L.Ed.2d 274 (1993).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • 09-23 046

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2015

    Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 157 (1993). … Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 507 (1995); Libertine v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 521, 523-24 (1996).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Clark

    553 F.2d 104 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 27, 1977

    The court concludes that in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court in United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976), and Brown v. … Allison v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 332 (1976); Morton v. United States, ante at 549.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Ronald Moulton v. Office of Personnel Management

    2023 MSPB 26 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 28, 2023

    There is, however, no such proviso language in section 8467(a), and the Board will not supply such language in interpreting the statute. See, e.g., Crockett v. … ID at 16-21; see Thomas v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Seminole Nation v. United States

    92 Ct. Cl. 210 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 7, 1940

    Klamath Indians v. United States (No. E-346), 81 C. Cls. 79 ; 296 U. S. 244, 254, 255 . … There is no proof that the Council was misled as to any fact within the knowledge of Brown, or that Brown had knowledge of any material fact which was not known to the Council.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Absorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United States

    30 C.C.P.A. 24 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 15, 1942

    See Borgfeldt v. United States, 124 Fed. 473 . … . * * * So, also, we think the reasoning in United States v. Brown & Co., 5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 212 , T. D. 34380, is applicable.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bradley v. Commissioner

    1 T.C. 518 · United States Tax Court · Feb 2, 1943

    Nor could it maintain that position under the law as declared in May v. Heiner , * * * The District Court for the Southern District of California in Brown v. United States , Fed. … The Board in the Hughes case did not assume the authority or have the temerity to overrule the decision of the Supreme Court in May v. Heiner . It did not essay to do so or think that it was doing so.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • McKesson v. United States

    3 Ct. Cust. 515 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 1, 1913

    D. 28576, and on the case of United States v. Sheldon ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 485 ; T. D. 32245). … The board was not in error in so classifying it, and the decision is affirmed.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • HDR Engineering, Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jan 15, 2025

    Brown, Esq. … Coombs v. Beede, 36 A. 104, 105 (Me. 1896).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Flach v. Commissioner

    13 B.T.A. 383 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 14, 1928

    FLACH, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Flach v. Commissioner Docket No. 12809. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioner.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Constitutionality of Legislation Limiting the Remedial Powers of the Inferior Federal Courts in School Desegregation Litigation

    Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · May 6, 1982

    Legal Status o f Transportation Remedies In Brown v. … Brown v. Board c f Education, 347 U .S. 483(1954).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • B & W Wholesale Co. v. United States

    63 Cust. Ct. 691 · United States Customs Court · Nov 3, 1969

    I -don’t believe we take possession until it gets on board ship. … United States v. Wiener, 15 Ct. Cust. Appls. 428 , T.D. 42594 (1928).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • 10-21 121

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014

    This matter is before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a May 2009 rating decision by the Regional Office (RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in Wichita, Kansas. … Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • 05-35 521

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2015

    See 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(a) (2013); Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995). … See generally Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • The People of the State of California Ex Rel. Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of the State of California v. United States

    110 Fed. Cl. 139 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 2, 2013

    RESOURCES BY AND THROUGH ITS * v. … INTRODUCTION In its Opinion and Order, PG&E v. United States, 105 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • A-C-A-A

    28 I. & N. Dec. 84 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Sep 24, 2020

    See Dia v. … Abebe v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 1037, 1040 (9th Cir. 2005); see also, e.g., Bondarenko v. Holder, 733 F.3d 899, 906 (9th Cir. 2013); Gishta v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 972, 980 (6th Cir. 2005); Paripovic v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Dade Brothers, Inc. v. United States

    163 Ct. Cl. 485 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1963

    (Docket No. 63243, Hudson County Ct., Law Division); Bryant, et. al. v. Dade Bros., Inc., et al. (Docket No. L-1690-52, N.J. Super. Ct., Hudson County); and O'Brien, et al. v. Dade Bros., Inc., et al. (Docket No. … Kuzma v. Millinery Works, etc. Local 24, 27 N.J. Super. 579 (App. Div. 1953).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • 03-00 167

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 30, 2015

    In an October 2011 decision, the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board), in part, denied the first two issues listed above concerning claims for earlier effective dates. The Veteran appealed to the U.S. … Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lykes Bros. S.S. Co. v. Commissioner

    42 B.T.A. 1395 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 29, 1940

    -RIPLEY STEAMSHIP CO., INC.), PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Lykes Bros. S.S. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 96637. … BROWN On March 20, 1933, the Shipping Board made an amendatory agreement with the petitioner by which the requirement of a $300,000 bond in the original agreement was eliminated and the requirement that the Postmaster General

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nikesha Williams v. Department of Defense

    2023 MSPB 23 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 17, 2023

    Hessami v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 979 F.3d 1362, 1369 (Fed. … Johnston v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 518 F.3d 905, 911 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (emphasis added) (quoting Reid v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 508 F.3d 674, 678 (Fed. Cir. 2007)).

    Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.