Case law

Eric T Bryant v. Department of Veterans Affairs

2024 MSPB 16 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 18, 2024

Department of the Navy, 62 M.S.P.R. 487, 490 (1994); see Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 (1985); Dieter v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2022 MSPB 32, ¶ 11 n.7. … See, e.g., Mathis v.

210722-174162

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 29, 2021

An assertion of CUE is a collateral attack on an otherwise final decision by the VA Regional Office (RO) or Board of Veterans Appeals (Board) decision. Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1527 (Fed. Cir. 1994). … Cir. 2000); Duran v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 216, 224 (1994); accord, Johnston v. West, 11 Vet. App. 240, 241 (1998). In that case, the Veteran must challenge the Board decision that subsumed the RO decision.

Fitzgerald v. United States

623 F.2d 696 · United States Court of Claims · May 28, 1980

Brown, III, saw him twice for about 3 hours and also met once with Dr. Ronald C. Dockett a clinical psychologist to whom Dr. Brown referred her. Upon receipt of Dr. Brown’s report, Dr. … Brown and incorporated in that report. While Dr. Haynes relied primarily upon Dr. Brown’s report, he also noted that it corroborated his impressions from his two short meetings with plaintiff.

Michelle Gilewicz v. Department of Homeland Security

2024 MSPB 7 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Apr 9, 2024

Skarada v. … Bergman v.

Aquitaine Wine USA, LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Apr 2, 2018

Sys. v. S. Ill. … .”); Tea Board of India v.

Smith v. United States

38 Ct. Cl. 257 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1903

They are summed up in a sentence or two in the case of Brown v. … And are reiterated in Runkle v. United States ( 122 U. S., 543 ).

Jason Hemann v. Department of Veterans Affairs

2022 MSPB 46 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 20, 2022

In Davis v. … Ledbetter, 2022 MSPB 41, ¶ 8; Wood v.

Pressman v. United States

33 Fed. Cl. 438 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 11, 1995

That contractual theory has its clearest and *443 earliest expression in Heyer Products Co. v. United States, 140 F.Supp. 409 , 135 Ct.Cl. 63 (1956). … See Floyd v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 889, 891 (1992), aff'd, 996 F.2d 1237 (Fed.Cir.), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 328 , 126 L.Ed.2d 274 (1993).

Monon Railroad v. Commissioner

55 T.C. 345 · United States Tax Court · Nov 25, 1970

The petitioner’s board of directors consisted of 11 members. … Gooding Amusement Co. v. Commissioner, supra; Commissioner v. H. P. Hood & Sons, supra; Brown-Rogers-Dixson Co. v. Commissioner, 122 F. 2d 347, 350 (C.A. 4, 1941); United States v. South Georgia Ry.

MENDOZA-SANDINO

22 I. & N. Dec. 1236 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2000

Dissenting Opinions: GUENDELSBERGER, Board Member; VILLAGELIU, Board Member; SCHMIDT, Chairman; ROSENBERG, Board Member. … Section 244(a)(2) of the Act; see also, e.g., Leon-Hernandez v. INS, 926 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1991); Brown v. INS, 856 F.2d 728 (5th Cir. 1988).

Alumax Inc. v. Commissioner

109 T.C. 133 · United States Tax Court · Sep 30, 1997

The Board of Tax Appeals in Erie Lighting Co. v. … Compare Billops v. Magness Constr. Co., 391 A.2d 196, 197-198 (Del. 1978), with Doxsee Sea Clam Co. v. Brown, 13 F.3d 550, 553 (2d Cir. 1994), and Carte Blanche (Singapore) PTE., Ltd. v. Diners Club Intl., Inc., 758 F.

McKesson v. United States

3 Ct. Cust. 515 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 1, 1913

D. 28576, and on the case of United States v. Sheldon ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 485 ; T. D. 32245). … The board was not in error in so classifying it, and the decision is affirmed.

Ronald Moulton v. Office of Personnel Management

2023 MSPB 26 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 28, 2023

There is, however, no such proviso language in section 8467(a), and the Board will not supply such language in interpreting the statute. See, e.g., Crockett v. … ID at 16-21; see Thomas v.

YAURI

25 I. & N. Dec. 103 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2009

In Sheng Gao Ni v. … V.

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United States

98 Fed. Cl. 699 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 8, 2011

See Oak Forest, Inc. v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 1397, 1399 (1992); Midwest Indus. Painting of Fla. v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 209, 211 (1983). … See 41 U.S.C. § 114 (b) (2010); Allied Oil & Supply, Inc. v. United States, 60 Fed.Cl. 223, 228 (2004) (citing Bowser, Inc. v. United States, 190 Ct.Cl. 441, 445 , 420 F.2d 1057, 1060 (1970); Bird v.

09-00 296

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 27, 2015

This matter comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a rating decision issued in March 2007 by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Atlanta, GA. … Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994).

10-11 116

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2015

Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518 (1996). Analysis The Veteran asserts that he has bilateral hearing loss disability as a result of noise exposure sustained in active service. … Heuer v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 379 (1995); Falzone v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 398 (1995); Caldwell v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 466 (1991). Also, the Board finds the Veteran to be credible.

J. K. Rishel Furniture Co. v. Commissioner

9 B.T.A. 287 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 25, 1927

RISHEL FURNITURE CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. J. K. Rishel Furniture Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 11113. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

Clark

553 F.2d 104 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 27, 1977

The court concludes that in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court in United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976), and Brown v. … Allison v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 332 (1976); Morton v. United States, ante at 549.

Bradley v. Commissioner

1 T.C. 518 · United States Tax Court · Feb 2, 1943

Nor could it maintain that position under the law as declared in May v. Heiner , * * * The District Court for the Southern District of California in Brown v. United States , Fed. … The Board in the Hughes case did not assume the authority or have the temerity to overrule the decision of the Supreme Court in May v. Heiner . It did not essay to do so or think that it was doing so.