Case law

People of the State of California Ex Rel. Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of the State of California v. United States

122 Fed. Cl. 315 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 16, 2015

Co. v. United States, (No. 07-157C), 105 Fed. Cl. 420 (2012) and California ex rel. Brown v. United States, (No. 07-184C), 105 Fed. … Brown v. United States, 110 Fed. Cl. at 140). The Government has not “provide[d] any reason why that order may be reconsidered now.” Pl. Resp. at 11.

Jacqueline Brown v. Department of the Air Force

Merit Systems Protection Board · Apr 30, 2024

v. … Indeed, the appellant had previously exhausted all of the personnel actions at issue with the Office of Special Counsel; however, she elected to challenge only one of these actions in her prior Board appeal. Brown v.

Drachman v. Commissioner

23 T.C. 558 · United States Tax Court · Dec 30, 1954

Brown et al., 9 B. T. A. 965; Stange-Elliott Coal Co., 4 B. T. A. 745. See also Dallas Rupe & Son, 20 T. C. 363 ; McKay Products Corporation, 9 T. C. 1082 , affirmed on this point (C. … The form of the transaction is not controlling, for, as the Supreme Court pointed out in John Kelley Co. v. Commissioner, 326 U.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 11, 2019

Online, Inc. v. … Online v.

Swiss Watch International, Inc. v. Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 30, 2012

As petitioner acknowledges, absolute control is not only not required, but the Board has recognized that absolute control would be impossible. Tea Board of India v. … Institut National Des Appellations d'Origine v. Brown-Forman Corp., 47 USPQ2d 1875, 1885 (TTAB 1998).

Bateman v. Commissioner

43 B.T.A. 69 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 11, 1940

Vinton v. Pratt, 228 Mass. 468 ; 117 N. E. 919 ; Shattuck v. Burrage, 229 Mass. 448 ; 118 N. E. 889 . Cf. Crawford v. Langmaid, 171 Mass. 309 ; 50 N. E. 606 . … Williams v. Inhabitants of Milton, 215 Mass. 1 ; 102 N. E. 355 ; Chase v. Union National Bank of Lowell, 275 Mass. 503 ; 176 N. E. 508 .

Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc. v. United States

95 Fed. Cl. 77 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 21, 2010

Reynolds v. Army & Air Force Ezch. Serv., 846 F.2d 746, 748 (Fed.Cir.1988) (citing Zunamon v. Brown, 418 F.2d 883, 886 (8th Cir.1969)). … The Court of Federal Claims does not have jurisdiction over tort claims against the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997).

Goewey v. United States

612 F.2d 539 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1979

Green Acres at Verona, Inc., 44 N.J. 100 , 207 A. 2d 513 (1965); Browne v. Smith, 119 Colo. 469 , 205 P. 2d 239 (1949); Stair v. Gilbert, 209 Ky. 243 , 272 S.W. 732 (1925); Pearl v. … In Thlocco v.

In re Burk

73 F.2d 497 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 3, 1934

Claims 18 and 23 are quoted as illustrative. v 18. … Co., 224 Fed. 464 ; Yablick v. Protecto Safety Appliance Corp. 21 F. (2d) 885; Danbury & Bethel Fur Co. v. American Hatters & Furriers Co., Inc., 54 F. (2d) 344.

In re Moore

444 F.2d 512 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 1, 1971

The question of the pertinency of the Brenner v. Manson decision may be disposed of rather easily. … In re Wilder, 57 CCPA 1314, 429 F. 2d 477 , 166 USPQ 545 (1970); In re Brown, 51 CCPA 1254, 329 F. 2d 1006 , 141 USPQ 245 (1964).

A. V. Olsson Trading Co. v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 93 · United States Customs Court · Sep 23, 1954

V. Olsson Trading Co., Inc., plaintiff and importer herein; T. V. Terling, importer and part owner of Scandia Commercial Co. since 1925; Z. S. Brown, examiner of merchandise at San Francisco; Franz S. … , Boston brown bread, and Swedish bread.

Hippodrome Co. v. Commissioner

10 B.T.A. 1010 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 24, 1928

THE HIPPODROME CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Hippodrome Co. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 7354, 21529. … Brown, and a man named Oppenheimer. Ackerman and Harris and Brown were theatrical men in business in cities north of Los Angeles.

Barger v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 132 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 24, 2002

Cir. 2000) ("canons of construction . . . require us to give effect to the clear language of a statute and avoid rendering any portions meaningless or superfluous"); Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1523 (Fed. … McCormick v. Gober, 14 Vet.App. 39, 44 (2000) (quoting Maggitt v. West, 202 F.3d 1370, 1379 (Fed. Cir. 2000)).

Birdsboro Steel Foundry & MacHine Co. v. United States

3 F. Supp. 640 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1933

Broadway Savings Trust Co. v. United States, 66 Ct. Cl. 429 ; Daniels & Fisher Stores Co. v. United States, 56 F.(2d) 477, 480 , 74 Ct. Cl. 233 . … In Daniels & Fisher Stores Co. v.

Miller v. United States

120 Fed. Cl. 772 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 17, 2015

Compare Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1157 (Fed. Cir. 1983), and Brown v. United States, 396 F.2d 989, 991 (Ct. Cl. 1968), with Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion, 470 U.S. 729, 744 (1985), and Walls v. … At present, military boards are regarded as entities having “special expertise” and are generally granted deference. See, e.g., Sargisson v. United States, 913 F.2d 918, 922 (Fed.

The Sisseton and Wahpeton Bands or Tribes v. The United States

423 F.2d 1386 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1970

In Chickasaw Nation v. … In Red Lake and Pembina Bands v.

National Bank of Commerce v. Commissioner

19 B.T.A. 1080 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 23, 1930

In Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. … Nebraska National Bank v. Union Stockyards National Bank, 187 N. W. 883 ; 108 Nebr. 417; Brown v. Deposit National Bank, 125 Misc. Rep. 247 ; 211 N. Y. S. 366; and Fagan v. Texas Co. (Texas Civ. App., 1920), 220 S.

Joel Gott Wines, LLC v. Rehoboth Von Gott, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 26, 2013

Kirsten Hampton Brown, an employee of opposer. Each deposition transcript is accompanied by attached exhibits. … v.

Podrez Enterprise, LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jul 2, 2019

Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 828 F.2d 759, 765 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (quoting JD. Hedin Constr. Co. v. United States, 408 F .2d 424, 431 (Ct. Cl. 1969)). … of Podrez Enterprise, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Draper & Co. v. Commissioner

5 T.C. 822 · United States Tax Court · Sep 28, 1945

In the recent case of Miller Manufacturing Co. v. … Austin v. United States, 28 Fed. (2d) 677; Gray & Co. v. United States, 35 Fed. (2d) 968; Thomas N. Perkins, 33 B. T. A. 606, 622. We think the following quotation from the court’s opinion in Gray & Co. v.