Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.77s
6 B.T.A. 1153 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 30, 1927
Kaufman-Straus Co. v. Lucas, 12 Fed. (2d) 774; Appeal of Atlantic Carton Corporation, 2 B. T. A. 380; Appeal of General Equipment Co., 2 B. T. A. 804; Appeal of Automatic Fire Protection Co., 3 B. T. … Browning, 6 B. T. A. 914, we allowed a deduction for the exhaustion of intangibles paid in without cost, or at a nominal cost of $1, on the basis of their proved value at the date acquired by the corporation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWhite Trimming House, Inc. v. Porter
154 F.2d 113 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1946
Lincoln Savings Bank v. Brown, Em. App., 137 F.2d 228 . … Philadelphia Coke Co. v. Bowles, Em.App., 139 F.2d 349 ; Lincoln Savings Bank v. Brown, Em.App., 137 F.2d 228 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedRenda Marine, Inc. v. United States
71 Fed. Cl. 782 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2006
Hart v. … Hood Stages, Inc., 437 U.S. 322, 330 , 98 S.Ct. 2370 , 57 L.Ed.2d 239 (1978) (same); Brown v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedAmerican General Trading & Contracting, WLL
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Apr 23, 2014
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). … Quality Mgmt., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished32 B.T.A. 1075 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 2, 1935
See Commissioner v. Brown, supra; Commissioner v. Babson, supra; Commissioner v. Cordingley, supra. … Commissioner v. Brown, supra. See also Hyman v. Helvering, supra.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTrademark Trial and Appeal Board · Aug 12, 2013
See FCC v. … spelled word “shiitake,” defined as “a mushroom native to East Asia, having an edible golden or dark brown cap.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedCrown Cork International Corp. v. Commissioner
4 T.C. 19 · United States Tax Court · Sep 21, 1944
August 8, 1939, to Brown, Harriman & Co. of London for the sum of $ 27,500, and the 20,000 shares of Crown Cork Co., Ltd., referred to in the above table on December 4, 1939, to Brown, Harriman & Co. of London for the sum … Because the Board's decision there under review had antedated Higgins v. *74 Smith and there were no ultimate findings on the issue as framed by the appellate court, the case was remanded for further proceedings.
Cited 26 timesPublishedBausch & Lomb Incorporated v. Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · May 28, 2008
Paramount Pictures Corp. v. … .”); Institut National Des Appellations d’Origine v. Brown-Forman Corp., 47 USPQ2d 1875, 1894 (“applicant’s MIST AND COGNAC mark … is a different mark … from CANADIAN MIST AND COGNAC …”).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 5, 2018
Inherent in the Board's decision was the recognition that ADT's contract was firm-fixed-price as is PE's. Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. v. United States, 748 F.3d 1341, 1347 (Fed. … Once a CO's final decision is appealed to this Board, the parties start with a clean slate and the contractor bears the burden of proving liability and damages de nova. Wilner v.
Cited 0 timesPublished67 Fed. Cl. 158 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 29, 2005
See 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(2); 2 see *161 also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“The Tucker Act does not provide independent jurisdiction over such claims for equitable relief.”); Passaro v. … Armed Forces Board of Correction decisions may be reviewed only to determine whether they are arbitrary and capricious or otherwise contrary to law. See, e.g., Chappell v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedFelix Paul Phillips v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 30, 2024
See Jackson v. … See Holland v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 443, 447 (1994) (holding that the Board may adjudicate an increased evaluation claim while referring a related request for TDIU for further adjudication); Harris v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJames R. Welcome v. Robert L. Wilkie
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 29, 2020
See Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1525 (Fed. Cir. 1996), superseded on other grounds by statute, 38 U.S.C. § 7111. … See Hudgens v. McDonald, 823 F.3d 630, 638 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNewark Morning Ledger Co. v. Commissioner
39 B.T.A. 654 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 28, 1939
The Board upheld the validity of the waiver, saying : In the instant case L. A. … Aiken v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 277 , 51 S. Ct. 148 , 75 L. Ed. -; Brown v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 283 , 51 S. Ct. 140 , 75 L. Ed. -; Burnet v. Railway Equipment Co., 282 U. S. 295 , 51 S. Ct. 137 , 75 L.
Cited 1 timesPublished2 Cl. Ct. 404 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 29, 1983
The Department of Army selection boards evaluated plaintiff once in August 1974, and once in September 1975. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); see also, Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., et al. v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. -, 688 F.2d 765 (1982); and Red Lake Band v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFarrell Lines Inc. v. United States
499 F.2d 587 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1974
See Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime Commission, 390 U.S. 261, 272 (1968); National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 (1965); Benton v. United States, 203 Ct. … See, e.g., Cammarano v. United States, 358 U.S. 498, 510-11 (1959); National Labor Relations Board v. Gullett Gin Co., 340 U.S. 361, 366 (1951). See also Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 5.07 (1958).
Cited 32 timesPublishedGuitar Trust Estate v. Commissioner
34 B.T.A. 857 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 4, 1936
In Crocker v. Malley, 249 U. … A.) and end with the citation of Brown & Ives, Trustees, on page 1229. Cf. Lynchburg Trust & Savings Bank v. Commissioner, 68 Fed. (2d) 356.
Cited 5 timesPublished175 F.2d 575 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 28, 1949
Wilson et al. v. Sherts et al., 23 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 914, 924, 81 F. (2d) 755, 28 USPQ 379 ; Brown, Jr. v. Barton, 26 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 889, 894, 102 F. (2d) 193, 41 USPQ 99 . The count reads: 1. … Yates v. Huson, 8 App. D. C. 93; Griffin v. Swenson, 15 App. D. C. 135; O’Connell v. Schmidt, 27 App. D. C. 77; Woods v. Poor, 29 App. D. C. 397, 403.
Cited 2 timesPublishedArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 1, 2022
Giesler v. United States, 232 F.3d 864, 876 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., 20-1 BCA ¶ 37,656 at 182,830-31. … . v.
Cited 0 timesPublished169 F.2d 808 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 1, 1948
In this connection, appellant cites in his brief the cases of *817 Landay v. United States, 6 Cir., 108 F.2d 698 and Johnson et al. v. United States, 6 Cir., 89 F.2d 913 . The same contention was made before the board. … Brown, Jr., v. Barton, 102 F.2d 193 , 26 C.C.P.A., Patents, 889.
Cited 17 timesPublished49 Fed. Cl. 673 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 29, 2001
See Colon v. United States, 35 Fed.Cl. 515, 517 (1996); see also Chandler v. United States, 47 Fed.Cl. 106, 113 (2000). … See Food and Drug Admin. v.
Cited 39 timesPublished
Ask Donna