Case law

Andre Martinez v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 21, 2019

Davis v. Michigan Dep’t of Treasury, 489 U.S. 803, 809 (1989). "Ambiguity is a creature not of definitional possibilities but of statutory context." Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994). … Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 481 (1972). The Court reviews constitutional questions de novo. Buzinski v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 360, 365 (1994).

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP v. Arroware Industries, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · May 2, 2019

See Medtronic, Inc. v. … See Fisons Ltd. v. Capability Brown Ltd., 209 USPQ 167, 169 (TTAB 1980); TBMP § 414(3).

Anderson-Clayton Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner

35 B.T.A. 795 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 31, 1937

Uncasville Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 55 Fed. (2d) 893, 895. See also Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 ; United States v. Anderson, 269 U. S. 422 ; Helvering v. Russian Finance Co., 77 Fed. (2d) 324. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered, under Bule 50.

Thermo LabSystems Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 15, 2007

Watson, Jr., after whom Brown University’s Watson Institute for International Studies is named; Mark W. … It is unfair to the examining attorney and the Board to “dump” hundreds and hundreds of pages of information and expect the Board and the examining attorney, with their limited resources, to ferret though such pages to verify

Mathews v. Commissioner

13 B.T.A. 1133 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 18, 1928

Co. v. Bond, 240 U. S. 449, 456 , 36 S. Ct. 403 , 60 L. Ed. 735; Standard Oil Co. v. Anderson, 212 U. S. 215, 227 , 29 S. Ct. 252 , 53 L. Ed. 480 . And see Casement v. Brown, 148 U. S. 615 , 13 S. Ct. 672 , 37 L. … Byers v. Commissioner, 8 B. T. A. 1191; Appeal of P. Frank Durkin, 4 B. T. A. 743; and Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. Wilson, 138 U. S. 501 . Reviewed by the Board.

Kaspare Cohn Co. v. Commissioner

35 B.T.A. 646 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 11, 1937

Kaspare Cohn Co. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 53696, 58428. United States Board of Tax Appeals 35 B.T.A. 646 ; 1937 BTA LEXIS 851 ; March 11, 1937 , Promulgated *851 1. … (Ontario) Ltd. v. The King, supra.

Osborn v. Commissioner

22 B.T.A. 935 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 30, 1931

Word v. Thompson, 22 How. 330, 334 ; 16 L. Ed. 249 ; Meehan v. Valentine, 145 U. S. 611 ; 12 Sup. Ct. 972; 36 L. Ed. 835 ; Keismetter v. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Griffin & Griffin Exploration, LLC v. United States

116 Fed. Cl. 163 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 27, 2014

Board Order at 14. … Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (“the general rule is that a Government contract tainted by fraud or wrongdoing is void ab initio . . . .

Jackson v. United States

10 Cl. Ct. 691 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 10, 1986

It is clear that actions based on alleged discriminatory animus are properly brought in the district courts and not the Claims Court. 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-16(c), 2000e-5(f)(3); 29 U.S.C. § 794a(a)(l); see Brown v. … Gragg v. United States, 717 F.2d 1343 (Fed.Cir.1983) (Civil Service Reform Act); Bell v. Brown, 557 F.2d 849 (D.C.Cir.1977) (Civil Rights Act).

10-27 396

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2014

The Board notes that the duty to assist in the development and adjudication of a claim is not a one-way street. Wamhoff v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 517, 522 (1996). … Russo v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 46 (1996).

Esso Standard Oil Co. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 111 · United States Customs Court · Mar 5, 1953

Yamada v. United States, 26 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 89, T. D, 49628. … Elder & Co. v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 61 , C.

Andrew Arms, Inc. v. Bowles

150 F.2d 972 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 1945

See Wynnewood Park Corporation v. Bowles, Em.App.1944, 143 F.2d 355 . … Chatlos v. Brown, Em.App.1943, 136 F.2d 490 ; Hillcrest Terrace Corporation v. Brown, Em.App.1943, 137 F.2d 663 .

Brian M. Osman v. James B. Peake

22 Vet. App. 252 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 8, 2008

Inc. v. … Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994).

CARDENAS ABREU

24 I. & N. Dec. 795 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2009

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 (2000))). … FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., supra, at 133 (quoting Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., 513 U.S. 561, 569 (1995), and FTC v. Mandel Brothers, Inc., 359 U.S. 385, 389 (1959)). 11 IV.

Dzialo v. United States

5 Cl. Ct. 554 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1984

Id. at 229 ; see also Brown v. United States, 184 Ct.Cl. 501, 518 , 396 F.2d 989 (1968). … Although this court does not sanction the shortcomings in the Board’s opinion, we believe, nevertheless, that to the extent the Board’s action was erroneous, it was harmless error. See Selman v.

Feldman v. Amos and Andy

68 F.2d 746 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 12, 1934

In The Asbestone Co. v. Philip Carey Mfg. Co., 41 App. D. C. 507, the appellee sought to register the term “Asbestone” as a trademark for hard asbestos boards. … Chemical Co. v.

Fleming v. United States

2 Cl. Ct. 111 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 22, 1983

However, in Hadley v. … Brown, 506 F.Supp. 336 , 337 & n. 2 (D.D.C. 1980), and this court has not been provided with or discovered any authority that would dictate another result.

BROWN v. COMMISSIONER

2005 T.C. Summary Opinion 37 · United States Tax Court · Mar 30, 2005

Summary Opinion 2005-37 UNITED STATES TAX COURT LIONEL BROWN, Petitioner v. … Sego v. Commissioner, supra at 610; Goza v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 176, 181 (2000).

Dieter Stussy v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Merit Systems Protection Board · May 27, 2016

v. … appeal for enforcement purposes) did not constitute a nonfrivolous allegation of Board jurisdiction in that IRA appeal, Stussy v.

United States v. Downing Co.

9 Ct. Cust. 84 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 25, 1919

United States v. Crompton & Son ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls., 197 ; T. D. 35442). … The board is entitled to form its own conclusion- from the use, but simply to ask this witness’s opinion is not competent. Judge Brown. I will sustain the objection (grant the motion). Q. Mr.