Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.11s
Southland Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner
17 T.C. 1551 · United States Tax Court · Mar 21, 1952
We shall first consider whether petitioner has established (1) above. … We think that the record clearly indicates that petitioner made a substantial change.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDe Graffenried v. United States
20 Cl. Ct. 458 · United States Court of Claims · May 18, 1990
Defendant has not established either that the claims are invalid or that this action is barred by the doctrine of laches, and plaintiff has established that the claims cover the accused Arsenal device. I. … Therefore, even if this court were incorrect and plaintiff had not established literal infringement of Claim 1, plaintiff has established infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. E.
Cited 10 timesPublishedTrademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jul 14, 2016
We have consistently held that, to qualify for a federal service mark registration, the use of a mark in commerce must be “lawful.” E.g., The John W. Carson Found. v. … -4- Serial No. 86362968 Every Joe website (everyjoe.com),6 Amazon.com,7 Patch.com,8 and O’Shaughnessy’s online (beyondthc.com),9 clearly indicates that a green
Cited 0 timesPublished42 Fed. Cl. 538 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 8, 1998
These allegations sufficiently establish a lease violation. … The government asserts that, because of the Tribe’s sovereign immunity, it cannot feasibly be joined. The court need not reach a determination of whether the Tribe can properly invoke sovereign immunity.
Cited 14 timesPublished52 T.C. 986 · United States Tax Court · Sep 24, 1969
Adjustments to Basis for Improvements In 1954, Peter made expenditures to establish, the private-brand service station. … It is well established that the value of Peter’s services may not be considered an expenditure. Cf. Marks v.
Reversed on other grounds by Peter Vaira and Mary L. Vaira v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 444 F.2d 770 (1971)Cited 81 timesPublishedConstitutionality of Regulatory Reform Legislation for Independent Agencies
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Sep 1, 1976
United States, 295 U.S. 602, 629–31 (1935), the Supreme Court held that Congress could establish a regulatory agency, in that case the FTC, and insure its independence from Executive Branch control by establishing a fixed … For the foregoing reasons, we recommend that the Department oppose the adoption of the sovereign immunity sections of S. 3308.
Cited 0 timesPublished21 I. & N. Dec. 381 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1996
I am not deciding that all or most Nicaraguans would qualify for suspension of deportation. … “Extreme hardship” not established. III.
Cited 10 timesPublishedApplication of Charles D. Prater and James Wei
415 F.2d 1378 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 20, 1968
Stopping of the motor simultaneously stops operation of the rotary switches driven by the motor and the valves of the circuits which are established at that point are displayed on meters. … The next significant development in the law relating to claims of this type is represented by the 1952 Act which in sections 100 and 101 clearly established the statutory category of “process.”
Modified by Application of Charles D. Prater and James Wei, 415 F.2d 1393 (1969)Cited 6 timesPublished24 Cl. Ct. 205 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 26, 1991
McDowell was clearly limited in his activities to a much greater extent than the government’s 20% and 40% ratings would reflect. … In addition, the Federal Circuit, in the first sentence of its opinion, quickly disposed of the government's argument, stating simply: “[t]his court’s precedents establish that the Claims Court possesses jurisdiction to review
Cited 0 timesPublished30 Fed. Cl. 296 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 5, 1994
Subsequently, plaintiff was assigned to Physical Risk Category 5 (not physically qualified/suitable for retention in Naval service by reason of injuries from accident). … The AS failed to establish that the BCNR findings were not supported by the record.
Cited 11 timesPublishedDeMauro Constr. Corp. v. United States
568 F.2d 1322 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 25, 1978
New's 903 (1957), established a dual system of government in the Ryukyus for the duration of American occupation. … This ordinance was entitled "Establishment of the Ryukyu Domestic Water Corporation.”
Cited 9 timesPublishedCompetitive Innovations, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 28, 2025
The RFQ was an “ordering activity” because it sought to establish BPAs against MAS contracts under FAR Subpart 8.4. Tab 20.1 at AR 828–29, 867. … The parties are ORDERED to file a Joint Status Report by August 13, 2025 including any proposed redactions and must explain why the proposed redacted information qualifies as protected information under the Protective Order
Cited 0 timesPublishedAdria Gharati v. Department of the Army
2022 MSPB 16 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 22, 2022
General Services Administration, 117 M.S.P.R. 616 (2012), to place the burden on the appellant to “clearly establish” that , but for the agency’s improper actions, she would have applied for the vacancies and … Accordingly, we need not determine whether the appellant “clearly established” that she would have applied and been selected for one of the permanent positions.
Cited 4 timesPublishedIdeogenics LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 26, 2018
The party invoking federal jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing standing. See Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. … The United States Supreme Court has described the “clearly erroneous” standard as significantly deferential.
Cited 0 timesPublished98 Fed. Cl. 360 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 21, 2011
Because this statute of limitations circumscribes the scope of the government’s waiver of sovereign immunity, it is “jurisdictional” in nature and must be construed strictly. See John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. … Thus, those periods of service do not qualify as "military service” under 50 U.S.C. app. § 511(2).
Cited 11 timesPublished6 Vet. App. 465 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 27, 1994
The appellant claims the BVA erred in determining that he did not present sufficient credible evidence to establish service connection. … The record clearly indicates that the appellant’s service records were destroyed, but it does not appear that the appellant was advised to provide alternate forms of evidence.
Cited 708 timesPublished288 F.2d 700 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1961
The Renegotiation Act, supra, clearly shows that plaintiff was employed subject to the Classification Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 954 , 972. … Thus the situation is this: Plaintiff must have been qualified for conversion to civil service status. Otherwise, Mr.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBaron Tube Co. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 10 · United States Customs Court · Dec 24, 1958
Anything more is clearly an advancement, and the higher rate attaches. … Two well-qualified witnesses, one, a manufacturer and distributor of steel tubing, with 42 years of experience in that line, the other, a consulting engineer, licensed in the States of New York and Ohio, who has spent the
Cited 2 timesPublishedTammie Morley v. Department of Veterans Affairs
2024 MSPB 17 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 20, 2024
ANALYSIS ¶5 To establish entitlement to an award of attorney fees under 5 U.S.C. … An award of attorney fees may be warranted in the interest of justice when: (1) the agency engaged in a prohibited personnel practice; (2) the agency action was clearly without merit or wholly unfounded,
Cited 6 timesPublished61 Fed. Cl. 146 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 29, 2004
In light of this history, the Supreme Court concluded that for collateral review for back pay to survive the finality requirement the claims must clearly rise to a constitutional level. Id. … He claims trial defense counsel failed to raise the issue of the suggestibility of his children through either 1) qualifying himself as an expert, or 2) obtaining this type of testimony from another expert. 5 Counsel’s use
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna