Case law

Brunson v. Brown

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Sep 29, 2023

See Webb v. Morella, 457 Fed. … Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11–12 (1991) (citing Forrester v. White, 484 U.S., at 227–229 (1988); Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 360 (1978)).

G & C Enterprises, Inc. v. Wage Appeals Board

619 F. Supp. 1430 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 16, 1985

Plaintiff appealed the finding through administrative channels to the Wage Appeals Board [“the Board”]. After a hearing and argument, the Board upheld the agency decision. … The Board held that “The 1964 amendments have been in place almost twenty years. The Board has no knowledge of any other contractors having a similar problem.

California Board of Equalization v. MGM Liquor Warehouse

52 B.R. 77 · District Court, D. Minnesota · Aug 16, 1985

Before the court is the California Board of Equalization appeal. The appeal was heard on written briefs without oral argument. James M. Strother appears for ap-pellee debtor. Derry L. Knight appears for the Board. … See, e.g., In re Anchorage International Inn, Inc., 718 F.2d 1446 (9th Cir.1983); Matter of Professional Bar Co., 537 F.2d 339 (9th Cir.1976); Meyer v. Bass, 281 F.2d 728 (9th Cir.1960).

Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, Virginia

338 F. Supp. 67 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jan 10, 1972

Prior to the decision in Brown v. … On June 23, 1955, the State Board discussed procedures to be followed in the light of the decree issued in Brown v. Board of Education.

Broadhead v. Brown

District Court, N.D. Alabama · Dec 16, 2019

O’Brian, Case No. 4:10- cv-00475-JHH-RRA; Broadhead v. Hopkins, Case No. 4:10-cv-00439-LSC-RRA; and Broadhead v. … Medberry v. Butler, 185 F.3d 1189, 1192 (11th Cir. 1999); Rivera v. Allin, 144 F.3d 719, 728-30 (11th Cir. 1998); Hernandez v. Ryan, No. 10-22789, 2010 WL 3447486 (S.D. Fla.

Brown v. Monroe

District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Nov 8, 2023

(the “Board”) found that Brown violated policy and that the 1 [Doc. … The Board provided meaningful review of the termination decision, and Defendants did not violate the final order of the Board to reinstate Brown. He has not provided any evidence that the Board 58 La.

BROWN v. ORTIZ

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 26, 2019

Petitioner recognizes that the Supreme Court, in Reno v. … United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 335 (1992).

Brown v. Burton

District Court, E.D. Michigan · Apr 5, 2021

Leitman v. … Any failure to comply with the conditions set forth in this order could result in the Court dismissing the habeas petition or ruling on only Brown’s currently exhausted claims. See Calhoun v.

Brown v. Pfeiffer

District Court, D. Minnesota · Oct 29, 2020

The government seeks to coordinate or partially consolidate this matter for pretrial purposes with Brown et al. v. Pfeiffer, et al., Case No. 19cv3132 (“Brown”). … The Court will then enter a scheduling order in the Enforcement Action and will issue an amended schedule in Brown; and 4. Both Brown, et al. v.

Cooperman v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF HILLSIDE TP.

577 F. Supp. 52 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 21, 1983

That case, while noting that Brown v. … v.

L.L. v. Evesham Township Board of Education

141 F. Supp. 3d 288 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 30, 2015

Both were students at Defendant Florence v. Evans Elementary School in Marlton, New Jersey within the purview of Defendant Evesham Township Board of Education. … Davis v.

Chris D. v. Montgomery County Board of Education

753 F. Supp. 922 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Dec 13, 1990

Dist. v. … The board argues that the Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision in Doe v.

Marks v. San Francisco Real Estate Board

58 F.R.D. 159 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 10, 1972

Plaintiff filed this anti-trust action against the San Francisco Real Estate Board, the Marin County Board of Realtors, and several real estate firms, all of which do business in some portion of what is described as the “ … Defendants point out that the Real Estate Boards sued herein each confines its operations to a single county, and argue that that fact is proof of the restrictions of the market.

Brown v. Pfeiffer

District Court, D. Minnesota · Oct 20, 2020

During the meeting, Pfeiffer massaged Brown’s upper thigh. When Brown was moving in, Pfeiffer asked Brown several times whether she had a boyfriend and whether a man would be moving in with her. … Neudecker v.

Brown v. Bihm

District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jun 28, 2023

Carswell v. Camp, 54 F.4th 307, 310 (5th Cir. 2022) (quoting Ramirez v. Guadarrama, 3 F.4th 129, 133 (5th Cir. 2021) (per curiam)). … (quoting Backe v. LeBlanc, 691 F.3d 645, 648 (5th Cir. 2012)).

Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. ex rel. Zurich Insurance v. Brown

220 F. Supp. 106 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Aug 7, 1963

See also Batson-Cook Company v. International Steel Erectors, (5 Cir.) 257 F.2d 410 ; Martin v. American Optical Company (5 Cir.) 184 F.2d 528 ; Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company et al. v. … In Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation v.

Thomas v. Troy City Board of Education

302 F. Supp. 2d 1303 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Feb 9, 2004

Texas Dep’t of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 254 , 101 S.Ct. 1089, 1094 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); Chapman v. AI Transport, 229 F.3d 1012, 1024 (11th Cir.2000) (en banc); Combs v. … See Holmes v. West Palm Beach Hous.

Brown v. Bratton

District Court, D. Maryland · Aug 10, 2021

See Haynes v. … Sraver v. Surgical Monitoring Servs., Inc., Civ. No. CCB-05-1331, 2006 WL 2190727, at *5 (D. Md. July 27, 2006) (citing Hopkins v. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co., 77 F.3d 745, 753–54 (4th Cir. 1996)); see also Brown v.

Lee v. Chambers County Board of Education

859 F. Supp. 1470 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 8, 1994

See, e.g., Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., 390 U.S. 400, 402 , 88 S.Ct. 964, 966 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1263 (1968). … Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 434 U.S. 412, 421 , 98 S.Ct. 694, 700 , 54 L.Ed.2d 648 (1978).

Brown v. Saul

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 13, 2020

Brown’s prior EEO activity” (Doc. 18-12 at 1). Plaintiff asserts that both Mr. Lee and Ms. … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586 (1986).