Opinion

Brown v. Burton

Court
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Filed
Apr 5, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 23.4%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ORLANDO BROWN,

Petitioner, Case No. 19-cv-12741

Hon. Matthew F. Leitman

v.

DEWAYNE BURTON,

Respondent.

__________________________________________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S SECOND

REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 16)

Petitioner Orlando Brown is a state prisoner in the custody of the Michigan

Department of Corrections. On September 19, 2019, Brown filed a pro se habeas

corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (See Pet., ECF No. 1.) After Respondent

filed an answer in opposition to the habeas petition, Brown asked the Court to stay

the federal proceedings while he exhausted state remedies for several new claims.

(See Mot., ECF No. 12, PageID.3386-3392.) On August 3, 2020, the Court granted

Brown’s motion, but conditioned the stay on Brown presenting his unexhausted

claims to the state trial court no later than December 14, 2020. (See Order, ECF No.

13, PageID.3507.)

On November 30, 2020, Brown moved for a 30-day extension of time to

comply with the Court’s order. (See Mot., ECF No. 14.) On December 15, 2020,

the Court granted Brown’s motion and ordered him to present his unexhausted

claims to the state court by January 14, 2021. (See Order, ECF No.15, PageID.3513).

On March 8, 2021, Brown filed another request for an extension of time. (See

Request, ECF No. 16.) He alleges that the prison where he is incarcerated has not

been operating normally due to an outbreak of COVID-19 and that he has had no

access to the prison law library. (See id., PageID.3515.)

Given the difficult and unusual circumstances arising from COVID-19, the

Court believes that Petitioner should be given another extension of time to present

his unexhausted claims to the state trial court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that

Brown’s request for an extension of time, ECF No. 16, is GRANTED. Brown shall

have sixty (60) days from the date of this order to submit his unexhausted claims to

the state trial court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Brown is unsuccessful in the state trial

court and in the State’s appellate courts, he shall have ninety (90) days after

exhausting state remedies to file an amended habeas corpus petition and a motion to

re-open this case. Any failure to comply with the conditions set forth in this order

could result in the Court dismissing the habeas petition or ruling on only Brown’s

currently exhausted claims. See Calhoun v. Bergh, 769 F.3d 409, 411 (6th Cir.

2014).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Matthew F. Leitman

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: April 5, 2021

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties

and/or counsel of record on April 5, 2021, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.

s/Holly A. Monda

Case Manager

(810) 341-9764

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.