Case law

A.D.L. v. Cinnaminson Township Board of Education

975 F. Supp. 2d 459 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 26, 2013

Mauclaire v. Conn. Dep’t of Educ., 397 F.3d 77, 82 (2d Cir.2005); Alex R. v. Forrestville Valley Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. # 221, 375 F.3d 603, 611 (7th Cir.2004)); see also D.K. v. … See Migra v. Warren City Sch. Dist.

Brown v. Jeffreys

District Court, D. Nebraska · Oct 9, 2025

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Marvin Brown’s Complaint filed on June 9, 2025. Filing No. 1. … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 569-70 (2007); see also Ashcroft v.

Brown v. Jantzen

District Court, D. Utah · Mar 5, 2025

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH KELLY CHRISTIAN BROWN, … Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v.

Bosarge v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 26, 2021

See Costlow v. Weeks, 7 790 F.2d 1486, 1488 (9th Cir. 1986). … See Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356, 365 (1990); also Alabama v.

Roe v. Mobile County Appointing, Board

904 F. Supp. 1315 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Sep 29, 1995

Lamar County Appointing Board since 1978, the Court FINDS: a. … Brown v. O’Brien, 469 F.2d 563 , 569 (D.C.Cir.1972) (predetermining plaintiffs equal protection claims), vacated as moot, 409 U.S. 816 , 93 S.Ct. 67 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 (1972).

Sheerer v. Hamilton County Board of Health

747 F. Supp. 2d 924 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 24, 2010

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Hamilton County Board of Health’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 27.) … BACKGROUND 1 Defendant, Hamilton County Board of Health, operates a public agency known as Hamilton County Public Health.

Brown v. Booker

District Court, W.D. Virginia · Mar 31, 2022

Brown also made additional inculpatory statements to the parole board. … Brown told the parole board in 1991 that he thought he “committed the crimes, stabbed Mrs. B and killed her 5 y/o son.” Id.

Brown v. Panessa

District Court, W.D. New York · Mar 21, 2025

and it is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Valentin v. … Breton v. City of N.Y., 404 F. Supp. 3d 799, 814 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Brown v. Townsend

District Court, E.D. Texas · Mar 5, 2025

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00432 Vernard Brown, Jr., Plaintiff, V. Lonnie E. … See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996).

BROWN v. ZAKEN

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 2025

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Brown must submit the full statutory and administrative filing fees by May 5, 2025. … Brown United States Magistrate Judge cc: RAYMOND BROWN LT6439

Chugach Elec. Ass'n v. Alaska Indus. Board

122 F. Supp. 210 · District Court, D. Alaska · Jul 27, 1954

On January 8, 1954, over the objections of the employer and insurer, the Board granted this application. … It perhaps should be noted at this point that, if the decision of the Board is affirmed, the additional temporary disability benefits will amount to more than $15,000.

Epps v. United States Capitol Police Board

719 F. Supp. 2d 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 2010

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39-40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Brown v. Kemper

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Apr 8, 2020

In his petition, Brown raises three grounds for relief. In ground one, Brown alleges that his rights were violated under Brady v. … Although I was reluctant to stay Brown’s petition and hold it in abeyance given that he did not appear to meet the good cause standard under Rhines v.

Lee v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Virginia · Jul 8, 2022

BROWN, et al., ) Chief United States District Judge Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Tyrone Hiawatha … Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)).

Assegai v. Bloomfield Board of Education

308 F. Supp. 2d 65 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Mar 4, 2004

The defendants, the Bloomfield Board of Education (“Board of Education”); the Bloomfield Police Department (“Police Department”); Richard Mulhall (“Chief Mul-hall”), former police chief of the Bloomfield Police Department … Leon v. Murphy, 988 F.2d 303 (2d Cir.1993).

Brown v. Turlich

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jun 4, 2025

Cordova v. Cuendiz, No. 20-1198, 2021 WL 5323762, at *3 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2021) (citing Kaminsky v. Wake Forest Univ. Baptist Med. Center, No. 08-882, 2009 WL 3208449, at *5 (M.D.N.C. … Stanga v. McCormick Shipping Corp., 268 F.2d 544, 554 (5th Cir. 1959) (noting that dismissal is not appropriate where there has been only one attempt at service of process); Allison v.

J.D. v. Manatee County School Board

340 F. Supp. 2d 1316 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Oct 8, 2004

The Board has appealed the ALJ’s decision, case no: 04-C V-1539-T-27MSS. … See Tennessee Dept. of Mental Health and Mental Retardation v. Paul B., 88 F.3d 1466, 1474 (6th Cir.1996) (citing Lunceford v. D.C. Board of Educ., 745 F.2d 1577 , 1582 (D.C.Cir.1984)).

Brown v. Martino

District Court, W.D. Michigan · May 12, 2025

Michelson v. … See Miles v. WTMX Radio, 15 F. App’x 213, 215 (6th Cir. 2001); Cosmichrome, Inc. v. Spectra Chrome, LLC, 504 F.

Lee v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Virginia · Jun 17, 2022

BROWN, et al., ) United States Magistrate Judge Defendants. ) ORDER Tyrone Hiawatha … Ippolito v. Buss, 293 F. Supp. 2d 881, 883 (N.D. Ind. 2003); see also Jamison v. United States Fed. Gov’t, No. 1:18-cv-00419, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213567, at *3 (S.D.

Hibbitts v. Buchanan County School Board

685 F. Supp. 2d 599 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Feb 23, 2010

This means that the defendants, the Buchanan County School Board, the individual board members, and Superintendent of Schools Tommy P. Justus, may not fire them without cause and certain procedural guarantees. … After the plaintiffs requested a hearing, Justus informed the plaintiffs that the Board was “no longer seeking to place Plaintiffs on probation” and they could pick up “standard” contracts at the school board office.