Opinion

BROWN v. ZAKEN

Court
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Apr 4, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 34.7%

describing standard of appellate review when no timely and specific objections are filed as limited to review for plain error

How later courts described this case

  • describing standard of appellate review when no timely and specific objections are filed as limited to review for plain error

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PITTSBURGH DIVISION

RAYMOND BROWN, )

) Civil Action No.:

) 2:23-CV-01649-CBB-MRH

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) United States Magistrate Judge

) Christopher B. Brown

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. )

)

FOWLER, COORECTIONAL SGT.

)

JOHN DOE, SUED INDIVIDUALLY )

AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY; AND )

COORECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN )

)

FOE, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER REVOKING STATUS

AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2025, it is hereby ORDERED that

Defendant C. Fowler’s motion to vacate order on motion for leave to proceed

(“IFP”) ECF No. 75 is GRANTED and Brown’s IFP status is

REVOKED in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice

to Brown reopening it by paying the full statutory and administrative filing fees

totaling $405.00.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Brown must submit the full statutory and

administrative filing fees by May 5, 2025. If the full statutory and administrative

filing fees are not submitted by that date, it will be recommended this case be

dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Brown’s pending Motion for Temporary

Restraining Order ECF No. 66 is dismissed as moot.

Our Local Rules permit objections to non-dispositive determinations of

Magistrate Judges. Therefore, under the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 72.C.2 of the

Local Rules of Court, Brown must file written objections, if any, to the Court’s

determination by April 24, 2025. Brown is cautioned that failure to file Objections

within this timeframe “will waive the right to appeal.” , 637

F.3d 187, 193 n.7 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting , 700 F.2d 113, 116 (3d

Cir. 1983). , 866

F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (describing standard of appellate review when no timely

and specific objections are filed as limited to review for plain error).

BY THE COURT:

s/Christopher B. Brown

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: RAYMOND BROWN

LT6439

SCI PHOENIX

1200 Mokychic Drive

Collegeville, PA 19426

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.