Case law

Robbins v. Camden City Board of Education

105 F.R.D. 49 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 22, 1985

In McDonnell-Doug *59 las Corp. v. … PPG Industries, 452 F.Supp. 594 (W.D.La.1978) (5 years), Brown v. Ford Motor Co., 19 EPD ¶ 8969 (N.D.Ga.1978) (4 years). Moreover, courts have also permitted discovery for periods after the alleged discrimination.

Conley v. United States Board of Parole

221 F. Supp. 445 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 27, 1963

Board. 1 On December 18, 1959 petitioner pleaded guilty to three counts charging narcotics violations under 21 U.S.C. §§ 173 and 174. … Witt v. United States, 287 F.2d 389 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 950 , 81 S.Ct. 1904 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1242 (1961).

COOPER v. CITY OF PATERSON

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 27, 2024

v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997))). Although a policy or custom is necessary to plead a municipal claim, it is not sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss. … Roman, 914 F.3d at 798-800 (quoting Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 215 (3d Cir. 2001)). Establishing a failure to train claim under Section 1983 is difficult and applies in narrow situations.

Benito M. v. Board of Education

544 F. Supp. 2d 713 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 28, 2008

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 , (1986);. Hedberg v. Indiana Bell Tel. Co., 47 F.3d 928, 931 (7th Cir. 1995). … Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 175 F.3d 544, 550 (7th Cir.1999), the Board of Education must present evidence that plaintiffs’ claimed fees were unreasonable. See Cody v.

J.B. v. Killingly Board of Education

990 F. Supp. 57 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Dec 19, 1997

See Karl v. Board of Educ. of Geneseo Cent. Sch. … See Detsel v. Board of Educ. of Auburn Enlarged City Sch.

Somers Construction Co. v. Board of Education

198 F. Supp. 732 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 25, 1961

Board of Education of East Orange, 1956, 39 N.J.Super. 565 , 121 A.2d 549 ; and Evers v. … Farrell v.

Bell v. Brown

District Court, N.D. Texas · Sep 15, 2025

VS. ) ) 3:25-CV-1394-G-BW MARIAN BROWN, ) … See Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 425 (5th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). In the event the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must * No objections were filed.

Johnson v. BOARD OF POLICE COM'RS

370 F. Supp. 2d 892 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 27, 2005

Switzer, III, Steven Brown, Missouri Attorney General's Office, St. Louis, MO, for Defendants Board of Police Commissioners: Jo Ann Freeman, Susan C.J. Rollins, Bartholomew Saracino, Michael J. Quinn, and Francis G. … Louis Board of Police Commissioners ("Police Board").

Wohlrabe v. Brown

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Nov 18, 2024

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). … According to Wohlrabe, Defendant Charles Brown, who works at the Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, submitted a victim impact statement in Wisconsin v.

Brown v. Bisignano

District Court, D. Utah · Sep 2, 2025

See Fischer-Ross v. … Qualls v. Apfel, 206 F.3d 1368, 1372 (10th Cir. 2000); Poppa v.

Brown v. National Permanent Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

526 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 1981

See Bustamante v. First Federal Savings and Loan Associa *821 tion, supra, 619 F.2d at 364 ; Harris v. … See Sosa v. Fite, 498 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. 1974); 11 French v. Wilson, 446 F.Supp. 216, 219-220 (D.R.I.1978); Palmer v.

Clement Bros. v. National Labor Relations Board

282 F. Supp. 540 · District Court, N.D. Georgia · Feb 8, 1968

The only Court to consider the question concluded that similar statements obtained by the Board were exempted by Section 552(b) (7), Barceloneta Shoe Corp. v. Compton, 271 F.Supp. 591 (D.C.1967). … The plaintiff seeks to bring itself within the exception of Leedom v.

Brown v. FIRST TENNESSEE BANK NAT. ASS'N

753 F. Supp. 2d 1249 · District Court, N.D. Georgia · Nov 20, 2009

753 F.Supp.2d 1249 (2009) Andrew BROWN, individually, and on behalf of a class of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. … Brown relies on United States v. Philip Morris Inc., 263 F.Supp.2d 72 (D.D.C.2003).

Diab v. Chicago Board of Education

850 F. Supp. 2d 899 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 7, 2012

SECTION 1983 We finally turn to Diab’s claim against the Board pursuant to § 1983. In Monell v. … Because Diab has not come forth with specific evidence of a widespread policy knowingly accepted by the Board, she cannot prove that the Board is liable for a § 1983 Monell claim.

Air Canada v. National Mediation Board

478 F. Supp. 615 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 22, 1979

Clerks v. Association for the Benefit of Non-Contract Employees, 380 U.S. 650 , 85 S.Ct. 1192 , 14 L.Ed.2d 133 (1965) (“Railway Clerks”); Local 732, Intern. Bro. v. … . 40, Railway Employees Department of American Federation of Labor v.

Brown v. Clark

District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Aug 7, 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA FANNIE BROWN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS … P. 33(b)(3); see Dugas v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, No. 12-02885, 2014 WL 458083, at *2 (W.D. La.

Castillo v. American Board of Surgery

221 F. Supp. 2d 564 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 2002

Brown v. Philip Morris, Inc., 250 F.3d 789 , 797 (3d Cir.2001) (quoting Yelverton v. Lehman, No. CIV.A. 94-6114, 1996 WL 296551 , at *7 (E.D.Pa. June 3, 1996), aff'd. mem., 175 F.3d 1012 (3d Cir.1999)). … See Hankins v.

Topolewski v. Police Jury

District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Feb 4, 2025

See Wilkerson v. Columbus Separate School Dist., 985 F.2d 815, 818 (5th Cir. 1993) (holding that members of the school board’s statement were admissible because the board members were agents of the school district). … board.

Morton v. DeJoy

District Court, E.D. Virginia · Sep 30, 2025

FECA claims, “must be presented to the Merit Systems Protection Board” (“MSPB”). Hicks v. Potter, 2011 WL 13196430, at *4 (E.D. Va. … . § 8151(b)); see also Brown v. Brennan, 2019 WL 13251354, at * (N.D. Ca.

Bowman v. United States Board of Parole

411 F. Supp. 329 · District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Apr 15, 1976

Richerson v. Wolff, supra, at 804 quoting United States ex rel. Johnson v. Chairman of New York State Board of Parole, 500 F.2d 925, 934 (2d Cir.), vacated as moot, 419 U.S. 1015 , 95 S.Ct. 488 , 42 L.Ed.2d 289 (1974). … See, e. g., Childs v. United States Board of Parole, 511 F.2d 1270, 1272 (D.C.Cir. 1974); Soloway v. Weger, 389 F.Supp. 409, 412 (D.Minn.1974); United States ex rel. Johnson v.