Opinion

Bell v. Brown

Court
District Court, N.D. Texas
Filed
Sep 15, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 39.3%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BRYAN BELL, )

#25015360, )

)

Petitioner, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

VS. )

) 3:25-CV-1394-G-BW

MARIAN BROWN, )

)

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge,*

in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted

as the Findings and Conclusions of the court. By separate judgment, this habeas

action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute or follow orders of the court.

A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required to appeal the denial of

relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 425 (5th

Cir. 2005) (per curiam). In the event the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must

* No objections were filed.

pay the $605.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis

and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account.

SO ORDERED.

September 15, 2025.

Ci of Ot CL

A. FISH

Senior United States District Judge

-2-

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.