Case law

CATHOLIC ACTION OF HAWAII, ETC. v. Brown

468 F. Supp. 190 · District Court, D. Hawaii · Mar 13, 1979

The study was reviewed by the Explosive Safety Board of the Department of Defense and approved in 1975. The West Loch Branch has been used for ordnance storage and maintenance since 1942. 5. … Co. v. Scenic Rivers Assn., 426 U.S. 776 , 96 S.Ct. 2430 , 49 L.Ed.2d 205 (1976). 9.

Stevenson v. State Board of Elections

638 F. Supp. 547 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 16, 1986

City School Bd., 377 U.S. 218 , 84 S.Ct. 1226 , 12 L.Ed.2d 256 (1964); Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 , 28 S.Ct. 441 , 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908); Orleans Parish School Board v. … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 36 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). One such interest is to prevent splintered parties and unrestrained factionalism. Id. at 735 , 94 S.Ct. at 1281 . Anderson v.

M.C.I. Concord Advisory Board v. Hall

457 F. Supp. 911 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 28, 1978

Hutto v. Finney, supra at —& n.25, 98 S.Ct. 2565 . See also Perez v. Rodriguez Bou, 575 F.2d 21, 24 (1st Cir. 1978); King v. … Nadeau v. Heglemoe, supra, at 280-282.

Eisner v. Stamford Board of Education

314 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Jul 2, 1970

In Zucker v. … V.

Taylor v. Ouachita Parish School Board

965 F. Supp. 2d 758 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Aug 13, 2013

If the district court finds such a violation, then under Brown v. Bd. of Educ. of Topeka, Shawnee County, Kan., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), and Brown v. … The school board’s constitutional duty is to cure the continuing effects of the dual system, not to achieve an ideal racial balance. Monteilh v. St. Landry Parish Sch.

Coca-Cola Co. v. Deacon Brown Bottling Co.

200 F. 105 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Feb 20, 1912

Omokehinde v. Detroit Board of Education

563 F. Supp. 2d 717 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Jun 12, 2008

In Casey v. … In Andrew v.

Firenze v. National Labor Relations Board

993 F. Supp. 2d 40 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 27, 2014

Waters v. … See Rankin v.

James v. The Cleveland School District

District Court, N.D. Mississippi · Jul 30, 2021

The Fifth Circuit, citing Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 443 U.S. 526 (1979), and Keyes v. … Id.; see Dayton, 443 U.S. at 538 (“[T]he measure of the post-Brown I conduct of a school board under an unsatisfied duty to liquidate a dual system is the effectiveness, not the purpose, of the actions in decreasing or

Brown v. Durrani

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 26, 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Tara Brown, … Plaintiff, Case No. 1:18cv785 v.

Brown v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) THOMAS LEROY BROWN, ) … ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 14-0264 (EGS) ) COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER

Brown v. Tromba

District Court, D. Nevada · Jul 19, 2022

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 Marlon Lorenzo Brown … Pilger v. Mosley, No. 2:18-cv-00854-JAD-PAL, 2018 WL 5268605, at *2 (D.

Brown v. Tromba

District Court, D. Nevada · Dec 27, 2022

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 MARLON LORENZO BROWN … Pilger 6 v. Mosley, No. 2:18-cv-00854-JAD-PAL, 2018 WL 5268605, at *2 (D. Nev.

Brown v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Shuntay Antonio Brown, : : Plaintiff, : … Sherley v. Sebelius, 644 F.3d 388, 392 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008)); see also Mazurek v.

Brown v. Illinois Department of Corrections

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Nov 30, 2022

Will v. Michigan Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 (1989) (see also Lapides v. Board of Regents, 535 U.S. 613, 617 (2002); Carroll v. DeTella, 255 F.3d 470, 471 (7th Cir.2001). … As hereinbefore demonstrated, Brown seeks reinstatement, which has been allowed and deemed permissible. See Kashani v. Purdue Univ., 813 F.2d 843, 848 (7th Cir.1987); Doe v. Bd. of Trs. of the Univ.

Segovia v. Board of Election Commissioners

201 F. Supp. 3d 924 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 23, 2016

The Defendants The state defendants are the Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago, Marisel Hernandez (the Chair of the Board of Election Commissioners), and Karen Kinney (the Rock Island County Clerk). … The Board of Election Commissioners, Ms. Hernandez, and Ms.

Russell v. Board of Plumbing Examiners

74 F. Supp. 2d 349 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 16, 1999

By motion filed on October 13, 1999, fully submitted and heard on November 5, 1999, defendants Board of Plumbing Examiners of the County of Westchester and the County of Westchester move for reconsideration of the portions … Their brief, however, supports this contention only with a Southern District of New York decision and a single decision of the Fifth Circuit [Morales v. Turman, et. al, v.

Allen v. State Board of Education

55 F.R.D. 350 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 3, 1972

Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 , 88 S.Ct. 1942 , 20 L.Ed.2d 947 (1968); Doremus v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 429 , 72 S.Ct. 394 , 96 L. Ed. 475 (1952); Frothingham v. … See Oelrichs v. Spain, 82 U.S. 211 , 15 Wall. 211 , 21 L.Ed. 43 (1872); Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States, 108 F.2d 784 (4th Cir. 1940); Brewer, et al. v. Norfolk School Board, et al., 456 F.2d 943 (4th Cir. 1972).

Hill v. AUGUSTA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

636 F. Supp. 2d 492 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Jul 17, 2009

E.E.O.C. v. Clay Printing Co., 955 F.2d 936, 940 (4th Cir.1992); see also Gross v. FBL Fin. … Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 511 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 , 125 L.Ed.2d 407 (1993); Rowe v.

Grosdidier v. Board Broadcast Governors

District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 2011

Civil Action No. 08-1553 (CKK) CHAIRMAN, BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS, Defendant. … See Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Gen. Elec.