Case law

Railroad Labor Board v. Robertson

3 F.2d 488 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 6, 1924

Congress has made no provision for the enforcement of the decisions of the Labor Board through the courts. The Supreme Court in Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Labor Board, 261 U. S. 72, 79 , 43 S. Ct. 278 , 67 L. … Nor is the inquiry before the Labor Board under consideration here a fishing expedition into private affairs, as was hold to be the case in Harriman v.

Jenner v. Board of Trustees

389 F. Supp. 430 · District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Dec 20, 1974

See Dahlinger v. Town Board of Delavan, 381 F.Supp. 474 (E. D.Wis.1974). … In Larkin v.

Brown v. Charles County Sheriffs Office

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2009

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Nonetheless,pro se plaintiffs must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Edmond v. Plainfield Board of Education

171 F. Supp. 3d 293 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 18, 2016

See Curay-Cramer v. … See Rolax v.

Lyle v. Charlie Brown Flying Club, Inc.

112 F.R.D. 392 · District Court, N.D. Georgia · Oct 1, 1986

Hashemi v. Campaigner Publications, Inc., 784 F.2d 1581, 1583 (11th Cir.1986), citing Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 762 F.2d 243 (2d Cir.1985). The court further noted in Donaldson v. … Coburn Optical Industries, Inc. v.

Brown v. Purdue University North Central

91 F. Supp. 3d 1026 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Feb 13, 2015

Brown was diagnosed with schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder in 1991. (DE # 24-1 at 2, Pl. Dep. 19:7-8, 14.) He enrolled at Purdue University North Central in August of 2006. (Id. at 3, Pl. Dep. 25:5-12.) … See Hansen v. Bd. of Trs. of Hamilton Southeastern Sch. Corp., 551 F.3d 599, 608 (7th Cir.2008); Groce v.

Brown v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 2024

USCIS cites Toensing v. U.S. … P'ship v. 4 USCIS actually appears to have pulled a bait-and-switch against Brown, because USCIS had previously encouraged him to file a duplicative FOIA request.

Herring v. Shelby County Government Health Service

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 18, 2025

(citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989))). III. Analysis A. … Wyatt v. Nissan N.

City of Virginia Beach, Va. v. Brown

858 F. Supp. 585 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jun 15, 1994

Secretary Brown consulted Justice, which advised him that its previous opinion still stood. … Therefore, Secretary Brown declined to change the ruling; on July 30, 1993, he denied North Carolina’s motion for reconsideration.

NATIONAL FEDERATION, ETC. v. Brown

481 F. Supp. 704 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 1979

481 F.Supp. 704 (1979) NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1622, Plaintiff, v. Harold M. BROWN, Individually and as Secretary of Defense, and the Department of Defense, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 78-2252. … See American Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. Brown, 481 F.Supp. 711 , 716 n. 6 (D.D.C. 1979).

Newsom v. Social Security Board

70 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Mar 5, 1947

A petition for reinstatement of the widow’s current insurance benefits filed with the Area Office, Bureau of Old-Age and Survivors Insurance of the Social Security Board, was denied on the basis of a Social Security Board … Plaintiff took exception to this determination and, after a hearing before the Referee of Region V, her claim was again denied for the same reason.

NAT. ASS'N OF OPTOMETRISTS & OPTICIANS v. Brown

709 F. Supp. 2d 968 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 28, 2010

Nat'l Ass'n of Optometrists & Opticians v. Brown ( "Brown" ), 567 F.3d 521, 528 (9th Cir. 2009). … Brown, 567 F.3d at 527 . The Court of Appeals continued to apply Exxon Corp. v.

Liggett Group, Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

748 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 27, 1990

The jury found that Brown & Williamson was not liable to Liggett on the trademark and unfair competition claims. … See Newman v.

Brown v. American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.

396 F. Supp. 2d 810 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Oct 24, 2005

Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1329 (6th Cir.1989)(en banc)(quoting Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 392 , 107 S.Ct. 2425, 2429 , 96 L.Ed.2d 318 (1987)). … See, e.g., Roddy v. Grand Trunk W.

In Re Dubbiosi

191 F. Supp. 65 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jan 31, 1961

The petitioner, Adorno Dubbiosi, having exhausted his administrative remedies, seeks judicial review of an order *66 of deportation entered on April 16, 1959, as modified with respect to an immaterial point by the Board of … Moreover, as clearly pointed out in Lazarescu v.

Little, Brown and Co.,(Inc.) v. Bourne

493 F. Supp. 544 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 23, 1980

Lizotte v. Canadian Johns Manville Co., 1 Cir. 1970, 387 F.2d 607, 608 . … See “Automatic" Sprinkler Corp. of America v.

Moore-Fotso v. Board of Education

211 F. Supp. 3d 1012 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 29, 2016

Modrowski v. … (holding that the “Board did not have the authority to assign a cadre substitute to ‘one place to work’ ”); see also Herr v. City of Chi., 479 F.Supp.2d 834, 842 (N.D.

Grant v. Alaska Industrial Board

11 Alaska 355 · District Court, D. Alaska · Jul 25, 1947

Corporation v. … Thus, in Green v.

Wood

District Court, D. Alaska · Feb 4, 2026

MJ Corp., 542 P.3d 1159, 1173–74 n.77 (Alaska 2024) (applying Alaska veil-piercing theory to an LLC). 32 L.D.G., Inc. v. Brown, 211 P.3d 1110, 1125 (Alaska 2009) (first quoting Elliott v. … Brown, 569 P.2d 1323, 1326 (Alaska 1977); and then quoting Uchitel Co. v. Tel. Co., 646 P.2d 229, 235 (Alaska 1982)); see also Brown v. Knowles, 307 P.3d 915, 929 (Alaska 2013). 33 Pister v.

Brown v. Corrections Corporation of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHARLITA BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).