Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,439 results
0.85s
Andrea L. Lindsey and Jason L. Lindsey
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRenco Grp., Inc. v. Wilmington Trust, Nat'l Ass'n (In re Magnesium Corp. of Am.)
583 B.R. 637 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Mar 30, 2018
However, that case is clearly distinguishable. … Here, the Renco Group and Wilmington Trust disagree as to whether the Renco Group qualifies as a creditor pursuant to section 502(h).
Cited 7 timesPublishedHeaney v. Lamento (In re Whiz Kids Development, LLC)
576 B.R. 731 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 17, 2017
A party alleging civil contempt must establish by clear and convincing evidence that a contemnor violated a court order, AccuSoft Corp. v. … The Sale Order clearly and unambiguously barred and enjoined persons who held interests in or against the property, such as Lamento, from asserting those interests against the property and Heaney.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJeffrey S. Thulin and Julie Bayles Thulin
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTerry W. Dedmon and Khristie Rae Gable
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownClint J. Jones and Pamela S. Jones
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · May 29, 2026
The matter at bar qualifies as a turnover action. … The debtor and the defendant purchased the property in 2006, during their marriage, and as the deed clearly indicates, they took title as husband and wife.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · Aug 20, 2026
Thus, in Arizona, neither default judgments nor unopposed summary judgments, which are identical for all practical purposes to a default judgment, qualify as the basis for preclusion. Id. at 175. … adversary proceeding, Plaintiff has 13 While “[n]ormally, the discharge causes community property acquired post-petition to be free from pre-petition community claims” under § 524(a)(3), such discharge does not immunize
Cited 0 timesUnknownUSGen New England, Inc. v. TransCanada Pipelines, Ltd. (In Re USGen New England, Inc.)
429 B.R. 437 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · Apr 1, 2010
In fact, the record establishes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Gaz Metro Bids did not qualify as bids for new capacity. … Further, the evidence in the record established affirmatively that the Gaz Metro Bids did not qualify as bids for new capacity and in fact were not bids for new capacity.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMorton v. Kievit (In Re Vallecito Gas, LLC)
440 B.R. 457 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Nov 17, 2010
Clearly, the assignment of an interest in property of the estate is a transfer. 19 . … In order to establish a claim under § 549, the Trustee need only establish that (1) a transfer occurred, (2) the transfer occurred after the commencement of the case, (3) the transfer was made without court authority, and
Cited 2 timesPublishedPollard v. Superior Community Credit Union (In Re Pollard)
306 B.R. 637 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · Feb 24, 2004
She anticipated not qualifying at all once her youngest son turned 18. … Like it or not, in the way of skilled employment the Debtor clearly is boxed in to an income level like the one she has had for the relevant past.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 25, 2024
The state court then described the actions the receiver should take, including negotiating the company’s loan with FirstBank, collecting rents, establishing bank accounts, and investigating best uses for the property. … § 29-40-121 and would have immunity pursuant to § 29-40-118. (Id., pp. 10-11.) Though summarized, these are all the powers granted the receiver by the state court.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2020
Under these facts, Local Bankruptcy Rule 5005-1(d) is determinative, and is intended to clarify the date of a filing that is not otherwise clearly established by the evidence. … However, the present circumstances do not qualify for relief under this provision.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna