Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFB

10,000+ results

1.56s

  • Williams v. Piazza (In Re Williams)

    144 B.R. 847 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 26, 1992

    .”); Childs v. Reynoldson, 777 F.2d 1305 (8th Cir.1985); McCaw v. Winter, 745 F.2d 533 (8th Cir.1984) (immunity of court clerk); Smith v. Bacon, 699 F.2d 434 (8th Cir.1983); Birch v. … Mazander, 678 F.2d 754 (8th Cir.1982); Billingsley v. Kyser, 691 F.2d 388 (8th Cir.1982) (prosecutor immunity); McClain v. Brown, 587 F.2d 389 (8th Cir.1978); Harley v. Oliver, 539 F.2d 1143 (8th Cir.1976); Wiggins v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Carter v. Schott (In Re Carter Paper Co.)

    220 B.R. 276 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · Apr 16, 1998

    However, we can use Reading v. Brown to move into an arena dealt with by Mosser. … The Reading v. Brown trustee managed the budding.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • McLaughlin v. Fireman's Trust Mortgage Corp. (In Re McLaughlin)

    96 B.R. 554 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 1989

    See, e.g., Ford v. … Supportive of this dictum is the subsequent Third Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Brown v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • AME Zion Church of Palo Alto, Inc. v. AME Zion Western Episcopal District

    United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · May 3, 2021

    Mulcare, 24 Mayer Brown LLP for AME Zion Church of Palo Alto, Inc.; Steven M. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Miami Employees Federal Credit Union v. Turner (In Re Turner)

    69 B.R. 95 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 13, 1987

    Davis v. Board of School Commissioners, 517 F.2d 1044, 1052 (5th Cir.1975). … United States v. IBM, 475 F.Supp. 1372 (D.C.N.Y.1979).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Brown

    128 B.R. 815 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · Mar 1, 1989

    owner of the merchandise. d) Taxes: Although the pre-printed agreement used by Colortyme contains a provision for sales tax, that particular provision was scratched out or blackened through in the agreement with Carolyn Brown … CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Applicability of Alabama Code Section 7-1-201(37) This Court has on numerous occasions 4 addressed the true lease v. disguised credit sale question.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Bellina's Restaurants II, Inc.

    52 B.R. 509 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · Jun 21, 1985

    This compilation was originally a report to the board of directors of Debtor, with balance sheet as of 9/30/84. … See: Robbie’s Yum Yum Tree W., Inc. v. Division of Bev., etc., 330 So.2d 743 [Fla.App. 1st 1976], 5.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Eubank v. Strickland (In Re Strickland)

    50 B.R. 16 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · May 31, 1985

    That court based its ruling on Kahler-Ellis Co. v. Ohio Turnpike Commission, 225 F.2d 922 (6th Cir.1955). See also Steele v. U.S., 390 F.Supp. 1109 (D.C.Cal.1975). … And see LeJeune v. Midwestern Ins. Co., 197 F.2d 149 (5th Cir.1952).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Gibson v. Gibson (In Re Gibson)

    157 B.R. 366 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 11, 1993

    Brown v. … In Singer v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re Unclaimed Freight of Monroe, Inc.

    244 B.R. 358 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · Nov 2, 1999

    In Piggly Wiggly Clarksville v. Mrs. … Whitfield v. Pennington, 832 F.2d 909 (5th Cir.1987).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Gallaudet (In Re Gallaudet)

    40 B.R. 828 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · Jun 15, 1984

    Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078 (2d Cir.1977); United Assn. of Journeyman and Apprentices of Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of United States and Canada v. … See Barnes v. Callaghan and Co., 559 F.2d 1102 (7th Cir.1977); United States use of E. & R. Construction Company v. Guy H.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Gerova Financial Group, Ltd.

    482 B.R. 86 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Oct 22, 2012

    Gerova’s directors held at least some board meetings in Bermuda and at least one of Gerova’s board members was Bermuda-based. Id. at ¶¶ 6-7 . … I, at v-xix (1973).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In Re Birchminster Corp. of California

    6 B.R. 258 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1980

    As the Supreme Court said in Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville R. … Particularly apposite is the statement of Chief Justice Hughes in Crowell v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • In Re Motel Investments of Christiansburg LLC

    307 B.R. 536 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · Mar 1, 2004

    In the letter, CFC relies upon Reading Co. v. … CFC also relies on Spunt v. Charlesbank Laundry, Inc.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re Sunedison, Inc.

    572 B.R. 482 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jun 16, 2017

    All Documents and Communications provided to, received from, or prepared for any Board, any committee of any Board, and/or any investment or management committee concerning the 2014 PSA or the Payment Agreement. *488 3. … All Documents and Communications provided to, received from, or prepared for any Board, any committee of any Board, and/or any investment or management committee concerning any proposed amendments to the 2014 PSA, including

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brandt v. KLC Financial, Inc. (In re Equipment Acquisition Resources, Inc.)

    481 B.R. 422 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 28, 2012

    In Meoli v. … Brown, 265 U.S. 1 , 44 S.Ct. 424 , 68 L.Ed. 873 (1924). . The court notes that while under Rule 9(b), states of mind may be alleged generally, the Supreme Court noted in Ashcroft v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hunter v. Babcock (In re Babcock Dairy Co. of Ohio)

    70 B.R. 674 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 9, 1986

    Hunter v. Pool Pals Manufacturing, Inc., supra. Rather, an insider may be any person or entity whose relationship with the debtor is sufficiently close so as to subject the relationship to careful scrutiny. Lingley v. … Although the Trustee has argued that the decision in Loftis v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lieber Enterprises, Inc. v. Wayne (In re Wayne)

    55 B.R. 615 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Dec 6, 1985

    Wisconsin v. Reese, 449 U.S. 833 , 101 S.Ct. 103 , 66 L.Ed.2d 38 (1980). Accord, Matter of Quality Holstein Leasing, 752 F.2d 1009 , 1012 (5th Cir.1985); Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. … Browning v. Navarro, 743 F.2d 1069, 1079 (5th Cir. 1984).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Prime, Inc.

    37 B.R. 897 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 21, 1984

    Reading Company v. Brown, 391 U.S. 471, 475 , 88 S.Ct. 1759, 1762 , 20 L.Ed.2d 751 (1968). … Wright v. Union Central Life Ins. Co., 311 U.S. 273, 278 , 61 S.Ct. 196, 199-200 , 85 L.Ed. 184 (1940).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Oppenheimer v. Reder (Reder)

    60 B.R. 529 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · Apr 1, 1986

    Oppenheimer had access to all company documents, and also sat in on all board meetings and meetings with the company’s lawyers and consultant. … Once he had exercised his stock option, he sat in on all board meetings and meetings with the firm’s lawyers and consultant.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.