Case law

Brown v. United States Postal Service

860 F.2d 884 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 26, 1988

Job Level and Nature As to the second factor, Brown did not have a high level, or supervisory job. Compare Brewer v. … See Glenn v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 616 F.2d 270, 271 (6th Cir.1980) (per curiam). The standard of review set forth by § 7703(c) is essentially that which is dictated by cases in this circuit. See Alsbury v.

Brown v. Illinois

559 U.S. 979 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 1, 2010

Johnson v. Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board

729 F.3d 1094 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Sep 11, 2013

Brown v. Entm’t Merch. Ass’n,-U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 2729, 2740 , 180 L.Ed.2d 708 (2011). … United States v.

Brown v. Gillette Co

787 F.2d 578 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Mar 3, 1986

787 F.2d 578 Brown v. Gillette Co. 85-1567 United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. 3/3/86 D.Mass., 536 F.Supp. 113 VACATED AND REMANDED

William Thornton v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 18, 2014

Andrino v. United States Board of Parole, 550 F.2d 519 (9th Cir. 1977) [(per curiam)]. … BROWN Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236, 243 (1963).

United States v. Brown

138 F. App'x 908 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 5, 2005

United States v. Summers, 268 F.3d 683, 687 (9th Cir.2001). Here, the 7-11 convenience store clerk’s 911 call provided the officers with reasonable suspicion to stop Brown. … It is irrelevant that Brown’s credit cards were not actually stolen. See United States v.

Board of Supervisors v. Tureaud

226 F.2d 714 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 26, 1955

Board of Sup’rs of La. State University, etc. v. Tureaud, 5 Cir., 207 F.2d 807 . … The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded for consideration in the light of the Segregation Cases decided May 17, 1954, Brown v.

Brown v. Parker Drilling Offshore Corp.

396 F.3d 619 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 5, 2005

McWilliams v. Texaco, Inc., 781 F.2d 514, 518-20 (5th Cir.1986). An employer is allowed to rely on certain legal defenses to deny these claims. McCorpen v. Cent. … Caulfield v. Kathryn Rae Towing, 1989 WL 121586 , at *2 (E.D.La. June 6, 1989); Lancaster Towing, Inc. v. Davis, 681 F.Supp. 387, 888-89 (N.D.Miss.1988).

Brown v. Williams

522 U.S. 1 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 20, 1997

Brown v. Brown, 513 U. S. 1040 (1994). Undeterred by this action, petitioner has continued filing frivolous petitions with this Court. … We enter this order barring prospective in forma pauperis filings by petitioner for the reasons discussed in Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

United States v. Brown

762 F.2d 995 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Feb 14, 1985

762 F.2d 995 U.S. v. Brown 84-1425 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. 2/14/85 E.D.Pa., VanArtsdalen, J. 587 F.Supp. 1005 AFFIRMED

Charles Donelson v. Randy Pfister

811 F.3d 911 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 28, 2016

See McAtee v. … Under Hill “the relevant question is whether there is any evidence in the record that could sup- port the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.” 472 U.S. at 455–56; see also McPherson v.

Brewer v. Wisconsin Board of Bar Examiners

270 F. App'x 418 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 13, 2008

See Greenawalt v. Ind. Dep’t of Corr., 397 F.3d 587, 589-90 (7th Cir.2005). Anyway the Board did not obtain the records. … Brewer cites Tennessee v.

United States v. William Brown, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Dec 22, 2008

United States v. … See United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 825 (1982).

De Laittre v. Board of Com'rs

149 F. 800 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Jan 14, 1907

See Robertson v. State Land Board, 42 Or. 183 , 70 Pac. 614 , Miller v. Wattier, 44 Or. 347 , 75 Pac. 209 , and Robertson v. Low, 44 Or. 587 , 77 Pac. 744 . … in the case of Parsons v.

Marvin Brown v. Bruce McAllister Detective

141 F.3d 1184 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Mar 19, 1998

See Houston v. … See Tosco Corp. v.

Brown v. New Jersey

175 U.S. 172 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 20, 1899

Louisiana v. Pilsbury, 105 U. S. 278, 294 ; Hallinger v. Devis, 146 U. S. 314, 319 ; Forsyth v. Hammond, 166 U. S. 506 . … Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Pet. 243 ; Fox v. Ohio, 5 How. 410 ; Twitchell v. Commonwealth, 7 Wall. 321 ; United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542, 552 ; Spies v. Illinois, 123 U. S. 131 ; In re Sawyer, 124 U.

Hart v. Board of Levee Com'rs

54 F. 559 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · Feb 7, 1893

In Hollingsworth v. Parish of Tensas, 17 Fed. Rep. 109, the court dealt with the authority to locate levees as a question relative to an exercise of the right of eminent domain. In an unreported case (El-dridge v. … Before considering the question at issue, it may be observed that in Morgan v. Livingston, 6 Mart.

Brown v. United States

12 U.S. 110 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 18, 1814

The property was claimed by Armitz Brown, under the purchase made in the preceding November. The district court dismissed the libel. … The cargo of the Emulous having been legally acquired and put on board the vessel, having been detained by an embargo, not intended to act on foreign property, the vessel having sailed before the war, from Savannah, under

Brown v. United States

150 U.S. 93 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 6, 1893

Ev. § 94; State v. Dean, 13 Iredell, 63; Patton v. State, 6 Ohio St. 467 ; State v. Thibeau , 30 Vermont, 100; State v. Larkin, 49 N. H. 39; Heine v. Commonwealth, 91 Penn. St. 145 ; Davis v. State, 9 Tex. App. 363.” … The same proposition is stated 'in the following authorities: People v. Davis, 56 N. Y. 95, 103 ; New York Guaranty & Indemnity Co. v. Gleason, 78 N. Y. 503 ; People v. McQuade, 110 N. Y. 284, 307 ; also Wharton, Grim.

Great American Indemnity Company v. Johnnie Brown

307 F.2d 306 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 6, 1962

Schoen v. … Brown v.