Case law

Brown v. Howard

5 F. 56 · United States Circuit Court · Jul 1, 1880

Thereupon Brown offered to prove this sum of $5,544.26 against the bankrupt’s estate, and the point to bo decided is whether he can do so. Brown was a trustee for J. C. … It by no means follows that Brown could have maintained any suit against them.

Sayles v. Brown

40 F. 8 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · Jul 9, 1889

Flash v. Conn, 109 U. S. 371 , 3 Sup. Ct. Rep. 263. But in the case of Garrett v. Sayles, neither in the circuit court (1 Fed. Rep. 375) nor on appeal in the supreme court (110. U. S. 288, 4 Sup. Ct. … Brown, Joseph Reynolds.

Brown v. Piatt

4 F. Cas. 425 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1821

Irwin v. Brown

13 F. Cas. 115 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · May 15, 1822

The demand, upon the acceptor, who resided in Alexandria. was made on Saturday, the 16th, and notice was given by mail of the 18th to the defendant, Brown, who resided in Washington.

Handy v. Brown

11 F. Cas. 422 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1810

Levy v. Brown

53 F. 568 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · Dec 24, 1892

Booth v. Brown

62 F. 794 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · Aug 11, 1894

National Labor Relations Board v. Blake Construction Co., Inc., and Its Alter Ego, M & S Building Supplies, Inc.

663 F.2d 272 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 17, 1981

The Board has wide latitude to exercise its remedial powers under the Act. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 215-17 , 85 S.Ct. 398, 405-06 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964); NLRB v. … San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers v. NLRB, 501 F.2d 794 , 802 (D.C.Cir.1974).

Penasquitos Village, Inc., Penasquitos Gardens, Inc., Penasquitos Hills, Inc., and San Diego Leisure Life Village v. National Labor Relations Board

565 F.2d 1074 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 30, 1977

Deference is accorded the Board’s factual conclusions for a different reason — Board members are presumed to have broad experience and expertise in labor-management relations. See NLRB v. … E. g., Meat Cutters Local No. 364 v. NLRB, 435 F.2d 668, 669 (9th Cir. 1970); Hughes & Hatcher, Inc. v.

Craig v. Brown

6 F. Cas. 721 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1815

Sury v. Brown

1 N.C. 99 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1793

Brown v. Deere

6 F. 484 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Jan 15, 1881

Farrow v. Brown

8 F. Cas. 1089 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · Jul 1, 1870

Brown v. Croak

312 F.3d 109 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Nov 27, 2002

BROWN, Appellant v. Paul CROAK, Food Service Manager II; Donald Sharpp, Food Service Manager I; Mr. Ballock, CFSS; Mr. Dross, CFSS; John McCullough, Superintendent, SCI Houtzdale; William E. … Because this is an appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, we view the facts in the light most favorable to Brown. See Leatherman v.

Brown v. Ruane

630 F.3d 62 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Jan 5, 2011

See Commonwealth v. Brown, 857 N.E.2d 507 (unpublished table decision), 2006 WL 3392089 (Mass. App. Ct. Nov. 24, 2006). … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 861 N.E.2d 28 (Mass. 2007); Brown v. Massachusetts, 552 U.S. 834 (2007).

United States v. Sanford-Brown, Limited

788 F.3d 696 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 8, 2015

U.S. v. Sanford‐ Brown, Ltd., 27 F.Supp.3d 940 (E.D. Wis. 2014).  … U.S. v. Sanford‐Brown, Ltd., 2014 WL 1272098 (E.D. Wis., March 27, 2014). On June 13, 2014, the district court granted the defen‐ dants’ motion for summary judgment. U.S. v. 

Board of Education v. Brown

503 U.S. 978 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 20, 1992

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Freeman v. Pitts, ante, p. 467, and Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City Pub. Schools v. Dowell, 498 U. S. 237 (1991).

Brown v. Robertson

4 F. Cas. 426 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Apr 7, 1843

The attorney for the corporation, said that this very point was decided in the case of Nichols v. … Brown was in the employment of Hon. Daniel Webster, then a senator of congress, at the time of the arrest, the act has no application to him, and affords no justification to the officer making the arrest.

Brown v. Memphis

4 F. Cas. 412 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Tennessee · Jul 1, 1879

BAXTER, Circuit Judge, decided in the Brown mandamus case that under the former judgments of the court, the plaintiff was entitled to have a tax levied sufficient to realize the sum of one hundred and twenty-five thousand

Craig v. Brown

6 F. Cas. 720 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1815

This suit is against Elisha Brown, and the bill of exchange offered in evidence-is signed by Elijah Brown. The plaintiff suffered a nonsuit.