Opinion

Handy v. Brown

  • 11 F. Cas. 422
  • 1 Cranch 610
Court
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Filed
Apr 15, 1810
Status
Published
Author
Fitzhugh
On the bench
Fitzhugh
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

THE COURT

(FITZHUGH, Circuit Judge,

absent) discharged the petitioner; it not being a binding within Act Assem. Md. 1793, c. 45. If the indenture is binding as an agreement, still it does not create the relative obligations of master and apprentice, under the act; and if it did, the 14th section forbids the assignment except in the case of the death of the master.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.