Case law

Brown v. Penders

101 F.4th 944 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · May 17, 2024

BROWN, Petitioner, Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. PENDERS, Chief U.S. … Suzanne Brown appeals from the November 23, 2022, denial of her petition for habeas corpus. Brown v. Rieger, No. 22-cv-00259, 2022 WL 17184294 (D. Me. Nov. 23, 2022).

National Labor Relations Board v. Security Guard Service, Inc.

384 F.2d 143 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 25, 1967

We are aware that despite such judicial deference to Board expertise, we must reverse the Board if the record does not contain substantial evidence to support its holding. Universal Camera Corp. v. … NLRB, 369 U.S. 843 , 82 S.Ct. 875 , 7 L.Ed.2d 847 ; Poultry Enterprises v. NLRB, 5 Cir. 1954, 216 F.2d 798, 802 ; NLRB v. Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co., 1 Cir. 1948, 169 F.2d 331, 334 .

Brown v. Magee

146 F. 765 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1906

In the case of Brown v. McDonald, 133 Fed. 897 , 67 C. C. A. 59 , 68 L. R. A. 462, the Circuit Court of Appeals of this district decided, upon a similar state of facts, that this plaintiff was entitled to a discovery.

Brown v. Walker

84 F. 532 · U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · Jan 11, 1898

See Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654 , 17 Sup. Ct. 453. The decree as enforc'd establishes the right of Walker & Co. to a lien upon the bonds, as against Anna L. … Co. v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co., 111 U. S. 505 , 4 Sup. Ct. 583; Johnson v. Christian, 125 U. S. 644 , 8 Sup. Ct. 989, 1135; Kingsbury v. Buckner, 134 U. S. 675 , 10 Sup. Ct. 638; and Robb v. Vos, 155 U. S. 38 , 15 Sup.

H. G. Skidmore v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

619 F.2d 157 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 26, 1979

. § 153 First (q), of an order of the National Rail Adjustment Board, Third Division (NRAB), which denied appellant certain rail passes to which he claimed entitlement under a labor agreement between his union and Conrail … SO v. Braidwood, 284 F.Supp. 607, 610-11 (N.D.Ill.1968).

Brown v. Sage

910 F.3d 738 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Dec 14, 2018

Jacoby v. National Labor Relations Board

233 F.3d 611 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 2000

We have held that the Board's interpretation of the duty of fair representation is entitled to deference under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. … NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 (1984), when the Board enforces that duty as part of its jurisdiction to identify and remedy unfair labor practices. Ferriso v. NLRB, 125 F.3d 865, 869 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Finerty v.

Patrick S. Martin v. United States

41 F.3d 1519 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Nov 9, 1994

MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-5094. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Nov. 9, 1994.

Maier v. Brown

17 F. 736 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · Sep 18, 1883

Brown, J. There is no doubt whatever of the general proposition that the patentee of an improvement is limited in his recovery to *737 such profits as may be'properly apportioned to the use of his improvement. … Seymour v. McCormick, 16 How. 480 ; Mowry v. Whitney, 14 Wall. 620 ; Littlefield v. Perry, 21 Wall. 205 ; Elizabeth v. Pavement Co. 97 U. S. 126 ; Garretson v. Clark, 15 Blatchf. 70 ; Zane v. Peck, 13 Fed.

Tilly v. Brown

23 F. Cas. 1276 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Aug 28, 1843

Davidson v. Brown

7 F. Cas. 29 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Jul 15, 1805

Craig v. Brown

6 F. Cas. 722 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1817

Boyd v. Brown

3 F. Cas. 1095 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · Dec 15, 1843

For another case involving this patent, see Boyd v. McAlpin, Case No. 1,748.]

Brown v. Sikes

212 F.3d 1205 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 25, 2000

See Alexander v. … In Alexander v.

Brown v. Schoonmaker

4 F. Cas. 428 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Dec 3, 1855

According to the decision of the court of appeals, the highest court in the state of New York, in the ease of Lott v. Wyckoff, 2 Comst. [2 N. Y.] 355, affirming the judgment of the court below in the same case, J. S.

Bischoffsheim v. Brown

34 F. 156 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Mar 19, 1888

It is further averred by the bill that the banking firm of Brown Bros. & Co. and J. W. … Simultaneously with the delivery of this agreement, a letter was delivered to Cassel, signed by Brown and Seligman, which contains the alleged trust sought by the bill to be enforced.

Mowat v. Brown

17 F. 718 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · Jul 15, 1883

The suit was brought against Brown & Brown, consisting of Calvin Brown and his brother. The plaintiff resides in Minneapolis, and the co-defendant not served resides in Canada. … I think, from all the facts stated in the case, that there is no doubt about the materiality of the testimony of the co-defendant, Brown, who is now in Canada.

Sacrider v. Brown

21 F. Cas. 134 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · Oct 15, 1844

In the case of Leftley v.

Lathrop v. Brown

14 F. Cas. 1178 · U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · Apr 15, 1871

Brown, upon a promissory note dated January 1, 1862, whereby one Jacob L. Riley, as principal, and Brown as surety, promised by the first of January then next to pay to John W. McLeod, or bearer, ,?

McFarland v. Brown

22 F. 787 · United States Circuit Court · Jan 5, 1884

This ease was argued and submitted upon the same proof as the case of this Same Complainant v.