“[i]t appears settled that a statute of limitations dismissal should be construed as a final ‘judgment on the merits,’ ” citing Spruill v. Merit Sys. Protection Board, 978 F.2d 679, 686-89 (Fed.Cir.1992)
How later courts described this case
- “[i]t appears settled that a statute of limitations dismissal should be construed as a final ‘judgment on the merits,’ ” citing Spruill v. Merit Sys. Protection Board, 978 F.2d 679, 686-89 (Fed.Cir.1992)
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
41 F.3d 1519
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Patrick S. MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-5094.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Nov. 9, 1994.
Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge, BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge, and SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Judgment
PER CURIAM.
1
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.