Opinion
The opinion
Buodgett, J.
This ease was argued and submitted upon the same proof as the case of this Same Complainant v. Deere & Mansar Manuf’g Co., ante, 783, and the reasons which led me to the conclusion that Hiero was no infringement in the first case are equally applicable to tins case. The bill is therefore dismissed for want of equity.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.
A word about cookies
We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.