Case law

Local Joint Executive Board v. National Labor Relations Board

515 F.3d 942 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 28, 2008

STANDARD OF REVIEW The Board’s interpretation of the Act is accorded considerable deference as long as it is “rational and consistent” with the statute. NLRB v. Calkins, 187 F.3d 1080, 1085 (9th Cir.1999); NLRB v. … “If ‘there are conflicting interpretations of the facts, and the one adopted by the Board is supported by substantial evidence,’ we may not substitute our own interpretation.” UAW v.

Joseph Allen, IV v. Brown Advisory, LLC

41 F.4th 843 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 20, 2022

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). We review the denial of the motion to amend for abuse of discretion. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Rsch., Inc., 401 U.S. 321, 330 (1971); Carroll v.

In Re Brown Family Farms, Inc., Debtor. Philip R. Joelson, Trustee v. John W. Brown and Frances P. Brown

872 F.2d 139 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1989

BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendants John W. Brown and Frances P. Brown (the Browns) appeal from a district court decision dismissing their bankruptcy appeal. … See MortgageAmerica Corp. v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. 789 F.2d 1146, 1148-50 (5th Cir.1986). We affirm. 1 .

Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 18, 2016

14-4083-cv Brown v. … See Brown v. CBS Corp., 19 F. Supp. 3d 390 (D. Conn. 2014).  

United States v. Rico Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 3, 2024

As such, notwithstanding Brown’s claim to the contrary, Wooden does not undermine the validity of our holding in Thompson. Accord United States v. … Apprendi v.

Wilmshurst v. Brown

231 F. App'x 555 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 30, 2007

We review de novo a district court’s decision to abstain on Younger grounds, Dubinka v. Judges of Superior Court of State of Cal. for County of Los Angeles, 23 F.3d 218, 221 (9th Cir.1994), and we affirm. … The district court properly dismissed Wilmshurst’s action pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971).

Roderic R. McDowell v. Pernell Brown

392 F.3d 1283 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Dec 8, 2004

McDowell demonstrated a § 1983 claim against a municipality under Board of County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 (1997); and (2) whether the district court erred in excluding all of Mr. … Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997).

National Labor Relations Board v. Warrensburg Board & Paper Corporation

340 F.2d 920 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 5, 1965

NLRB v. … That in fact was the policy of the Board at that time. However, in 1960 the same court, in NLRB v.

Brown v. Village of Romeoville

407 F. App'x 56 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 7, 2011

Brown then initiated this litigation against the Village of Romeoville, its chief of police, and the arresting officers. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants, Brown v. … These undisputed facts support the district court’s conclusion that the officers had probable cause to arrest Brown for disorderly conduct. See Biddle v. Martin, 992 F.2d 673, 677 (7th Cir.1993); People v.

DeSosa v. Brown

357 F. App'x 901 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 14, 2009

The district court did not err in concluding that DeSosa failed to establish either deficient performance or resulting prejudice under the standard announced in Strickland v. … See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1); Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63, 72-73 , 123 S.Ct. 1166 , 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003); see also Rios v.

Brown v. Felsen

439 U.S. 925 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 30, 1978

Brown v. Gray

568 U.S. 1107 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 7, 2013

Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward

999 F.3d 1300 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 7, 2021

Brown, 387 F.3d at 1350. … See Brown, 387 F.3d at 1350; Mitchell, 873 F.3d at 874.

Allen Brown v. United States

438 F.2d 1385 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 25, 1971

PER CURIAM: Allen Brown was convicted by a jury of a Dyer Act offense 1 on October 22, 1969. This Court affirmed the judgment of conviction upon Brown’s %irect appeal, United States v. … Under these circumstances, Brown is not entitled to a transcript at Government expense. Walker v. United States, 424 F.2d 278 (5th Cir. 1970). Affirmed. 1 . 18 U.S.C. § 2312 .

Brown v. Harvey Coal Corp.

61 F.2d 624 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 11, 1932

Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States, 270 U. S. 349 , 46 S. Ct. 284 , 70 L. Ed. 624 ; Law v. United States, 266 U. S. 494 , 45 S. Ct. 175 , 69 L. Ed. 401 ; United States v. Gordin, 9 F.(2d) 394 (6 C. C. … .); Roark v. Fordson Coal Co., 10 F.(2d) 70, 71 (6 C. C. A.); Oyler v. Cleveland, etc., Ry. Co., 16 F.(2d) 455 (6 C. C. A.); Akre v. Liberty State Bank (C. C.

Brown & Root, Inc. v. Joyner

607 F.2d 1087 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 26, 1979

BUTZNER, Circuit Judge: Brown & Root, Inc., and its workers’ compensation insurer, Travelers Insurance Company, appeal two final orders of the Benefits Review Board awarding benefits under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers … The Board’s awards are affirmed. . Stewart v. Brown & Root, Inc., 7 BRBS 356, 365 (1978); Joyner v.

Brown v. Investors Mortgage Co.

121 F.3d 472 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 29, 1997

Brown argues applying DIDMCA to these intrastate loans violates the Commerce Clause as interpreted in United States v. … V. Finally, Brown asserts the IMC loan is both procedurally and substantively unconscionable.

Petroleum Enhancer, LLC v. Woodward

690 F.3d 757 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 10, 2012

At this meeting, the board voted to appoint Sharon Minnock “to fill a vacancy on the Board of Directors.” … See Langley v.

Cupp v. Brown

390 F. App'x 228 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 4, 2010

PER CURIAM: Steven Cupp appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. … Cupp v. Brown, No. 2:08-cv-00060-REM-JSK, 2009 WL 3711954 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 3, 2009).

Colleen P. Kramer v. Banc of America Securities, LLC

355 F.3d 961 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 20, 2004

See Partee v. … See Thaler v.