Opinion

Cupp v. Brown

  • 390 F. App'x 228
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Aug 4, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Keenan, Traxler, Wilkinson
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.9%

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Cupp appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cupp v. Brown, No. 2:08-cv-00060-REM-JSK, 2009 WL 3711954 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral ai'gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.