Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersF

10,000+ results

0.55s

  • Allen L. Fludd v. United States Secret Service Maurice Daugherty

    771 F.2d 549 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 13, 1985

    clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. … If the law was clearly established, the immunity defense ordinarily should fail, since a reasonably competent public official should know the law governing his conduct.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bibeau v. Pacific Northwest Research Foundation

    188 F.3d 1105 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 19, 1999

    Heller's assistant) contend that as government contractors that did not violate any clearly established constitutional rights, they are entitled to qualified immunity. … immunity and liability under section 1983. 7 Generally, the key question to be answered for purposes of qualified immunity is whether the law was clearly established at the time of the alleged acts.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Connie Reguli v. Tracy Hetzel

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 16, 2026

    For qualified immunity, we ask whether the defendant violated clearly established law. See Wesby, 583 U.S. at 63. … Page 14 Hetzel receive qualified immunity because their conduct didn’t violate clearly established law. See Wesby, 583 U.S. at 63.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • DeAnzona v. City & County of Denver

    222 F.3d 1229 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Aug 2, 2000

    If the defendant argues that she is entitled to qualified immunity under the plaintiff's version of the facts because the plaintiff has not demonstrated a violation of clearly established law, this Court may properly exercise … We hold that the district court erred by denying Brooks's motion for qualified immunity. DeAnzona had the burden of proving with specificity how Brooks violated Redd's clearly established right. See Tonkovich v.

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Stack v. Killian

    96 F.3d 159 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 1996

    Officials who perform discretionary functions are generally entitled to qualified immunity from individual liability for civil damages so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … The question of whether an official is protected by qualified immunity turns on the objective legal reasonableness of the action, assessed in light of the legal rules that were “clearly established” at the time it was taken

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Fletcher v. Town of Clinton

    196 F.3d 41 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Nov 8, 1999

    Qualified immunity analysis is two-pronged. "First, the court must establish whether the constitutional right asserted by the plaintiff was 'clearly established' at the time of the alleged violation." St. … The charge of escape did not result in a violation of her clearly established constitutional rights, and the officers are, therefore, protected by qualified immunity. C.

    Cited 116 timesPublished
  • Smithson v. Aldrich

    235 F.3d 1058 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Dec 21, 2000

    clearly established; and (3) raise[d] a genuine issue of fact as to whether the official would have known that his alleged conduct would have violated the plaintiff[s'] clearly established right." … Stated another way, qualified immunity shields a defendant from suit if he or she could have reasonably believed his or her conduct to be lawful "in light of clearly established law and the information [that the defendant

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Janet Feliciano v. City of Miami Beach

    707 F.3d 1244 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Feb 5, 2013

    The district court denied the defendant officers qualified immunity on the claim, reasoning that although their initial entry did not violate Feliciano’s clearly established Fourth Amendment rights, they plainly exceeded … The district court rejected the officers’ claims for qualified immunity, but solely on the ground that the scope of their search, particularly of the underwear drawer and kitchen pantry, violated Feliciano’s clearly established

    Cited 515 timesPublished
  • Patrick F. Boyle v. William Burke, Joseph Yergeau, Mark G. Kelliher, Peter Weeks, Ruth Griffin and Raymond Labrie

    925 F.2d 497 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Feb 6, 1991

    It is enough that the rights of these reservists were not clearly established until the October, 1986 amendment. … Clearly, therefore, defendants are entitled to qualified immunity against all such claims whatever the time period involved.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Dorian Johnson v. City of Ferguson

    864 F.3d 866 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 25, 2017

    a clearly established constitutional violation. … Whether Officer Wilson and Chief Jackson are entitled to qualified immunity turns on whether it was clearly established that Officer Wilson violated Johnson’s Fourth Amendment rights.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Parker v. American Traffic Solutions, Inc.

    835 F.3d 1363 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Aug 31, 2016

    It is by now well-established that an order denying federal qualified immunity satisfies the above requirements. See Schmelz v. Monroe Cty., 954 F.2d 1540 , 1543 (11th Cir. 1992) (citing Mitchell v. … Rule 38 sanctions are appropriately imposed against appellants who raise “clearly frivolous claims in the face of established law and clear facts.” Farese v.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Freeman v. Blair

    793 F.2d 166 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jun 4, 1986

    The decisions to inspect without a warrant clearly were functions for which Blair and Massa are not entitled to absolute immunity nor, as we conclude below, were the decisions reasonable under clearly established law. … Our task then will be to determine whether the law in the areas implicated in those claims was clearly established at the time of the actions here at issue and thus whether the state officials’ qualified immunity defenses

    Vacated on other grounds by Madewell v. Roberts, 909 F.2d 1203 (1990)Cited 24 timesPublished
  • DePree v. Saunders

    588 F.3d 282 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 13, 2009

    First, if DePree’s speech was constitutionally protected, Saunders was entitled to qualified immunity because her conduct did not violate a clearly established constitutional right. Foley v. … “Qualified immunity protects public officials from suit unless their conduct violates a clearly established constitutional right.” Mace v. City of Palestine, 333 F.3d 621, 623 (5th Cir. 2003).

    Abrogated on other grounds by David Sims v. City of Madisonville, 894 F.3d 632 (2018)Cited 117 timesPublished
  • William Brinsdon v. McAllen Independent Sch Dist

    863 F.3d 338 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 30, 2017

    To establish that qualified immunity does not apply, Brinsdon must prove that Santos or Cavazos (1) “violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged … Second, the district court held that Santos and Cavazos were entitled to qualified immunity because how existing law applied to the facts was not clearly established.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Martinez v. City of Schenectady

    115 F.3d 111 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 13, 1997

    does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known,’ Harlow v. … The officers are therefore entitled to qualified immunity from Martinez’s section 1983 claim.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Goodson v. City of Corpus Christi

    202 F.3d 730 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 26, 2000

    Qualified Immunity 7 In considering Gaines and Perez’s qualified immunity claim, we must remain cognizant of the fact that the “qualified . . . … But that dispute is not dispositive of the qualified immunity question at this moment.

    Cited 271 timesPublished
  • Tonkovich v. Kansas Board of Regents

    159 F.3d 504 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Oct 26, 1998

    II, doc. 7 at 679 (Dean Jerry entitled to qualified immunity because his actions did not violate clearly established constitutional rights); see also id. vol. … Pages and pages of facts are no substitute for citations to clearly established law. Nor can they meet Professor Tonkovich’s burden on qualified immunity.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Justin Schimandle v. DeKalb County Sheriff's Office

    114 F.4th 648 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 28, 2024

    A Qualified immunity requires the court to determine: (1) whether the record evidences the violation of a federal statu- tory or constitutional right; and if so (2) whether the right violated was clearly established at … “There is no question that [Schimandle’s] constitutional right to be free from arrest without probable cause was clearly established at the time of the incident.”

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Jody Lombardo v. City of St. Louis

    956 F.3d 1009 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 20, 2020

    Having concluded that the facts presented do not make out a violation of Gilbert’s constitutional rights, we need not evaluate the clearly established prong of the qualified immunity analysis. See Greenman v. … Jessen, 787 F.3d 882, 887 & n.10 (8th Cir. 2015) (affirming the district court’s grant of qualified immunity based on the constitutional violation prong even though the district court only reached the clearly established

    Reversed by Lombardo v. St. Louis, 594 U.S. 464 (2021)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Matthew Tarabochia v. Mickey Adkins

    766 F.3d 1115 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 9, 2014

    “Qualified immunity protects government officials from civil damages ‘insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.’” … Clearly Established Although this suspicionless stop and search violated the Fourth Amendment, the WDFW officers are still entitled to qualified immunity on this claim if the Tarabochias’ rights were not clearly established

    Cited 85 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.