Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.21s
Data Management Services Joint Venture v. United States
78 Fed. Cl. 366 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 10, 2007
Bannum, Inc. v. United States, 404 F.3d 1346, 1351 (Fed.Cir.2005). Our consideration of the agency’s action is deferential, particularly in the context of a best value procurement. Galen Medical Assocs., Inc. v. … SENIOR RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST (or equivalent) FUNCTION: Implements ERA Risk Program including support to the Risk Review Boards and Risk Review Teams. Facilitates formal Risk Management meetings.
Cited 20 timesPublishedPeterson Builders, Inc. v. United States
41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,074 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 28, 1997
See United States v. Spearin, 248 U.S. 132, 136 , 39 S.Ct. 59, 61 , 63 L.Ed. 166 (1918). … In Hickman, the Board found the Government responsible for the specifications concerning the propellers because, in the design contract, the metallurgical composition of the propellers had been provided by the Government
Cited 0 timesPublishedHardiman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 16, 2024
Board of Pediatrics. … V. Analysis a.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedChukwudum v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 22, 2025
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Pfeifer, 462 U.S. 523 (1983) (citing Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Liepelt, 444 U.S. 490 (1980); see e.g., L.J. v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 8 Reed v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. … Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 00-182V, 2005 WL 2659073, at *6 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Sept. 21, 2005).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 23, 2016
See United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 398 (1976); Contreras v. United States, 64 Fed. Cl. 583, 588 (2005); see also Eastport Steamship Corp. v. United States, 372 F.2d 1002, 1007 (Ct. … Marshall v. United States, 2010 WL 125978, at *3 (Fed. Cl. Jan. 14, 2010) (Article VI); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623-24 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (Fourth Amendment); Trafny v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedApplied Companies v. United States
41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,122 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 1997
Applied appealed the default termination to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) and in March 1994, the ASBCA converted the default termination into a termination for convenience. … Christian and Assocs. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCalohan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 2, 2025
Shah * v. … Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec’y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCrawford v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 13, 2025
Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt) 6 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity each … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 23, 2021
See Mahoney v. United States, 129 Fed. Cl. 589, 592 (2016) (“To the extent that Mr. Mahoney's claim relies upon the First and Fourth Amendments, the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.”); see also Brown v. … Cl. 111, 120 (2020), Roberson v. United States, 115 Fed. Cl. 234, 240 (2014) (“The Fourth Amendment is not money- mandating.” (citing Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d at 623) ), appeal dismissed, 556 F. App’x 966 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedQuapaw Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
128 Fed. Cl. 642 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 12, 2016
(citing Arizona v. California, 460 U.S 608, 618, n. 8 (1983)). For example, in Athey v. … V. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242 (1993). However, the Government may introduce expert testimony to dispute the valuation, extrapolation and calculation models employed in the Quapaw Analysis.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDhital v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 6, 2026
He triple board-certified with boards in internal medicine, allergy-immunology, and rheumatology. Id. at 2. Dr. … Fein is board certified in Interventional Pulmonology and has been practicing medicine for well over a decade. See id.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished68 Fed. Cl. 468 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2005
Proceedings to Date Following the government’s termination of the contract for default, Axion appealed to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA”). … Ruggiero v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedNelson Construction Co. v. United States
79 Fed. Cl. 81 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 29, 2007
See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997). … Co. v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 13, 2020
Plaintiffs allege a Fifth Amendment takings of their reversionary interest in property underlying the railroad line right-of-way, as a result of the Surface Transportation Board’s (“STB”) issuance of a Notice of Interim Trail … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 16, 2014
Petitioners, * Moran v. … He has also served on the editorial board of the journal, Neuromuscular Disorders.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWarrior Focused Solutions, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 17, 2025
After conducting evaluations, the Source Selection Evaluation Board (“SSEB”) produced its report on July 17; its results are summarized below: 3 (AR5733–34). … ST Net, Inc. v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 99, 110 (2013); see also CACI, Inc.-Fed. v. United States, 158 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStarnes v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 17, 2024
Such an across-the- board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt)12 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHealth Republic Insurance Company v. United States
129 Fed. Cl. 757 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 10, 2017
See King v. St. … (quoting Brown v. Duchesne, 60 U.S. 183, 194 (1856))); see also Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def.
Cited 8 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 16, 2014
Petitioners, * Moran v. … He has also served on the editorial board of the journal, Neuromuscular Disorders.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMetcalf Construction Co. v. United States
102 Fed. Cl. 334 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2011
See Todd v. … Co. v.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna