Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

1.21s

  • Data Management Services Joint Venture v. United States

    78 Fed. Cl. 366 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 10, 2007

    Bannum, Inc. v. United States, 404 F.3d 1346, 1351 (Fed.Cir.2005). Our consideration of the agency’s action is deferential, particularly in the context of a best value procurement. Galen Medical Assocs., Inc. v. … SENIOR RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST (or equivalent) FUNCTION: Implements ERA Risk Program including support to the Risk Review Boards and Risk Review Teams. Facilitates formal Risk Management meetings.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Peterson Builders, Inc. v. United States

    41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,074 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 28, 1997

    See United States v. Spearin, 248 U.S. 132, 136 , 39 S.Ct. 59, 61 , 63 L.Ed. 166 (1918). … In Hickman, the Board found the Government responsible for the specifications concerning the propellers because, in the design contract, the metallurgical composition of the propellers had been provided by the Government

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hardiman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 16, 2024

    Board of Pediatrics. … V. Analysis a.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Chukwudum v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 22, 2025

    Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Pfeifer, 462 U.S. 523 (1983) (citing Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Liepelt, 444 U.S. 490 (1980); see e.g., L.J. v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 8 Reed v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. … Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 00-182V, 2005 WL 2659073, at *6 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Sept. 21, 2005).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Norington v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 23, 2016

    See United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 398 (1976); Contreras v. United States, 64 Fed. Cl. 583, 588 (2005); see also Eastport Steamship Corp. v. United States, 372 F.2d 1002, 1007 (Ct. … Marshall v. United States, 2010 WL 125978, at *3 (Fed. Cl. Jan. 14, 2010) (Article VI); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623-24 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (Fourth Amendment); Trafny v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Applied Companies v. United States

    41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,122 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 1997

    Applied appealed the default termination to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) and in March 1994, the ASBCA converted the default termination into a termination for convenience. … Christian and Assocs. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Calohan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 2, 2025

    Shah * v. … Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec’y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Crawford v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 13, 2025

    Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt) 6 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity each … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Vanover v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 23, 2021

    See Mahoney v. United States, 129 Fed. Cl. 589, 592 (2016) (“To the extent that Mr. Mahoney's claim relies upon the First and Fourth Amendments, the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.”); see also Brown v. … Cl. 111, 120 (2020), Roberson v. United States, 115 Fed. Cl. 234, 240 (2014) (“The Fourth Amendment is not money- mandating.” (citing Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d at 623) ), appeal dismissed, 556 F. App’x 966 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States

    128 Fed. Cl. 642 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 12, 2016

    (citing Arizona v. California, 460 U.S 608, 618, n. 8 (1983)). For example, in Athey v. … V. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242 (1993). However, the Government may introduce expert testimony to dispute the valuation, extrapolation and calculation models employed in the Quapaw Analysis.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dhital v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 6, 2026

    He triple board-certified with boards in internal medicine, allergy-immunology, and rheumatology. Id. at 2. Dr. … Fein is board certified in Interventional Pulmonology and has been practicing medicine for well over a decade. See id.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Axion Corp. v. United States

    68 Fed. Cl. 468 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2005

    Proceedings to Date Following the government’s termination of the contract for default, Axion appealed to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA”). … Ruggiero v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Nelson Construction Co. v. United States

    79 Fed. Cl. 81 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 29, 2007

    See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997). … Co. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Barlow v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 13, 2020

    Plaintiffs allege a Fifth Amendment takings of their reversionary interest in property underlying the railroad line right-of-way, as a result of the Surface Transportation Board’s (“STB”) issuance of a Notice of Interim Trail … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Simanski v. Hhs

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 16, 2014

    Petitioners, * Moran v. … He has also served on the editorial board of the journal, Neuromuscular Disorders.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Warrior Focused Solutions, LLC v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 17, 2025

    After conducting evaluations, the Source Selection Evaluation Board (“SSEB”) produced its report on July 17; its results are summarized below: 3 (AR5733–34). … ST Net, Inc. v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 99, 110 (2013); see also CACI, Inc.-Fed. v. United States, 158 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Starnes v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 17, 2024

    Such an across-the- board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt)12 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Health Republic Insurance Company v. United States

    129 Fed. Cl. 757 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 10, 2017

    See King v. St. … (quoting Brown v. Duchesne, 60 U.S. 183, 194 (1856))); see also Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Todd Simanski and Julia Simanski, as Parents and Next Friends of O.A.s, a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 16, 2014

    Petitioners, * Moran v. … He has also served on the editorial board of the journal, Neuromuscular Disorders.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Metcalf Construction Co. v. United States

    102 Fed. Cl. 334 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2011

    See Todd v. … Co. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.