Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

3.77s

  • Hirsch v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 12, 2019

    Am., Inc. v. United States, 880 F.3d 1326, 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2018); Axiom Res. Mgmt., Inc. v. United States, 564 F.3d 1374, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2009). … Ethyl Corp. v. Browner, 989 F.2d 522, 524 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Delozier v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 10, 2020

    Norris is board certified in Dermatology, Dermatologic Immunology and Diagnostic and Laboratory Immunology. Id. Dr. … Tollefson is board certified in dermatology and pediatric dermatology. Id. She has been an attending pediatric dermatologist at the Mayo Clinic since 2010. Id. at 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pacific National Cellular v. United States

    41 Fed. Cl. 20 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 1998

    Act, explicitly states, “[t]he United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim against the United States ... not sounding in tort.” 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(1) (1994); see also Brown … v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • MCNULTY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 3, 2026

    Cl. 148, 154 (2012); Friedman v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 94 Fed. Cl. 323, 334 (2010); Doe 21 v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 89 Fed. Cl. 661, 668 (2009); Bear, 2013 WL 691963, at *5; Lumsden v. … Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec’y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Martin v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 13, 2017

    Angelo v. United States, 57 Fed. Cl. 100, 105 (2003) (quoting Herman v. RSR Sec. Services, 172 F.3d 132, 142 (2d Cir. 1999)). In Angelo v. … In response, the government identified the Broadcasting Board of Governors (“BBG”), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”), and the Peace Corps. Id at 5.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gurney v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 29, 2019

    He is also board certified in neuromuscular and electrodiagnostic medicine. (Ex. 28, p. 1.) Dr. … Id.; accord Tenneson v. HHS, No. 16-1664V, 2018 WL 3083140, at *5 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Vogler v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 16, 2014

    The next day, neurologist Evelyn Brown, M.D., examined Mr. Vogler. Id. at 25. … Daubert v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Shirlington Limousine & Transportation, Inc. v. United States

    77 Fed. Cl. 157 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 27, 2007

    Co. v. … Id. at 557 (Jan. 1, 2007 Deck of Aliza Brown). .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Aero Corp., S.A. v. United States

    42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,213 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 18, 1997

    Co. v. United States, 30 Fed. … V 44; see also A.R., tab 12, vol. Ill, at III-l-l. . PL's Resp. at 15. . Id. . Compl. H 59. . Def.’s Mot. at 69. . "The [Source Selection Evaluation Board] shall not compare proposals against each other.”

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Visual Connections, LLC v. United States

    120 Fed. Cl. 684 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 7, 2015

    Corp. v. … critical for the 10The court notes that States Roofing, like the other cases cited by protestor in its brief regarding this issue, are not bid protest cases, but are Federal Circuit decisions which have been appealed from the Board

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2019

    progressed through preliminary discovery and towards claim construction, also taking into account six separate applications post-complaint for inter partes review filed by the United States with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2021

    Sn the Gunited States Court of Federal Claing OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: November 15, 2021 * * * * * * * * * * * * * Unpublished RICHARD ROBINSON, * Petitioner, * No. 19-2011V * V. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY … For future unreimbursable Knee Brace, Heel Pad Protector, Rolling Walker, Bariatric Wheelcharr, Bariatric Lift Chair, Hoyer Lift, Hand Held Shower, Stander, Drop Arm Commode, Urinal, Bedpan, Transfer Board, Gait Belt, ADLs

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • People, Technology and Processes, LLC v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 8, 2021

    On September 3, 2019, the Source Selection Evaluation Board (“SSEB”) convened for training as to how the proposals should be evaluated. (See AR 4017–84). … Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 415 (1971), overruled on other grounds by Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Allen v. United States

    119 Fed. Cl. 461 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 22, 2015

    (quoting Interwest Constr. v. Brown, 29 F.3d 611, 615 (Fed.Cir.1994))); K-Con Bldg. Sys., Inc. v. United States, 107 Fed.Cl. 571, 600 (2012). … (internal citations omitted) (quoting Interwest Constr. v. Brown, 29 F.3d at 615 ; Beta Sys., Inc. v. United States, 838 F.2d at 1183 ) (alterations in McAbee Constr., *492 Inc. v. United States)).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ervin & Associates, Inc. v. United States

    59 Fed. Cl. 267 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 20, 2004

    The Board, however, severely limited the potential scope of such data, finding that “[a]ny ... … In Ruckelshaus v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Decker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 5, 2021

    Caturegli is board certified in endocrinology from the Italian Board of Endocrinology and clinical pathology from the American Board of Pathology. Caturegli CV at 16; Tr. 394:23–25. At the hearing, I qualified Dr. … Cetaruk has received board certifications from the American College of Toxicology, the American Board of Emergency Medicine (with special qualifications in Medical Toxicology), and the National Board of Medical Examiners.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Salerno v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 29, 2021

    Moran * v. … Gutstein is board certified in neurology and currently is a private practitioner as well as an assistant professor of Neurology at the New York University School of Medicine. In the past, Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Jewell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 28, 2016

    Moberly v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 592 F.3d 1315, 1321-22 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (quoting Shyface v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 165 F.3d 1344, 1352-53 (Fed. Cir. 1999)). In the seminal case of Althen v. … See Thibaudeau v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl. Ct. 400, 403-04 (Fed. Cl. Oct. 23, 1991); see also Grant v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 956 F.2d 1144, 1148 (Fed. Cir. 1992); Hasler v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nadar v. Secretary of Health Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 6, 2015

    Sabella v. HHS, 86 Fed. Cl. 201, 215 (2009); Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437 (1983); Rupert v. HHS, 52 Fed. Cl. 684, 686 (2002); Wilcox v. HHS, No. 90-991V, 1997 WL 101572, at *4 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … Attorney Vourlis is a board-certified Civil Trial Advocate with an established career spanning 23 years. (Reply at 8.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United States

    62 Fed. Cl. 703 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 29, 2004

    Ciampitti v. … Board of Ed. of School Disk of City of Cincinnati, 510 F.Supp. 1251, 1265 (S.D.Ohio 1980) (stating that “concurring opinions have no legal effect, and thus, are in no way binding on any court”).

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.