Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.28s
Rudzki v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 15, 2026
Nahm is a practicing neurologist and is board certified in Psychiatry and Neurology. He holds an M.D. and a Ph.D. Pet. Ex. 9 at 1. 21 V. … He is board-certified in neurology and in clinical neurophysiology and epilepsy.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCompetitive Innovations, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 28, 2025
LLC v. United States, 173 Fed. Cl. 788, 796 (citing CACI, Inc.-Fed. v. United States, 67 F.4th 1145, 1151 (Fed. Cir. 2023)). … Discussion In federal procurements, “late is late.” eSimplicity, Inc. v. United States, 162 Fed. Cl. 372, 377 (2022) (citation omitted). And “submission deadlines are strictly enforced across the board.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedSwitzer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 27, 2022
Fife has written 151 peer-reviewed publications, is board certified in internal medicine, and is board eligible in infectious diseases. Id. 2. Expert Reports Dr. … Davis v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 94 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedValeria Flores v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 12, 2013
Kerr is certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. … She is board-certified in both Pediatrics and Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublished99 Fed. Cl. 223 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 21, 2011
Hall has challenged this removal before both the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) and the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”). She initially appealed the proposed removal to the MSPB in early 2005. … In United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedEmerald International Corp. v. United States
54 Fed. Cl. 674 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 13, 2002
Saipan Joint Venture, Inc. v. … See, e.g., Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243 (Fed.Cir.1996). .
Cited 11 timesPublishedKnura v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 26, 2018
Id. at 10 (citing Brown v. Sec’y of HHS, 2011 WL 5029865, at *44-45 (Fed. Cl. Sept. 30, 2011)). Moreover, petitioner argued that Kole was undergoing treatment when the petition was filed and Dr. … See Brown, 2011 WL 5029865, at *43-44 (finding a two-month interval between vaccination and onset of ADEM as satisfying the appropriate temporal interval requirement for causation).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJohnny F. Smith Truck & Dragline Service, Inc. v. United States
49 Fed. Cl. 443 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 21, 2001
Servs., Inc. v. … V.
Cited 5 timesPublished60 Fed. Cl. 718 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 8, 2004
In Aerolease Long Beach v. … Steinthal & Co. v.
Vacated by Bannum, Inc. v. United States, 126 F. App'x 958 (2005)Cited 50 timesPublishedPublic Service Co. v. United States
88 Fed. Cl. 250 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 22, 2009
Co. of Am. v. … Co., II v.
Cited 5 timesPublished74 Fed. Cl. 489 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2006
Lois V. … Defendant cites Davies v. United States, 31 Fed.Cl. 769, 778-779 (1994) (citing Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedReturn Mail, Inc v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 18, 2014
On April 15, 2014, the USPS filed a petition with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) for post-grant review of the ’548 Patent under Section 18 of the America Invents Act (AIA), Pub. L. … Defendant, citing Landis v. N. Am.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedGambo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 2, 2015
Moberly v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 592 F.3d 1315, 1322 n.2 (Fed. Cir. 2010). … Epstein v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 35 Fed. Cl. 467, 478 (Fed. Cl. 1996); see also Brown v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 18 Cl.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTurnquest v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 28, 2025
Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt) 6 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity each … respectively); McGraw v. Sec’y of Health & Hum.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBuck v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 27, 2025
Accordingly, I will reduce the sum to be awarded for entitlement briefing (a total of 30.5 hours, or $12,967.50) by ten percent.8 Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt) 9 fairly captures the overbilling … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDe La Cruz Jimenez v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 18, 2021
Jd. at 2 (citing Hairston v. United States, 99 Fed. Cl. 695, 697-98 (2011) and Brown v. United States, 105 F.8d. 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997)). … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997); see also Stephenson v. United States, 58 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished101 Fed. Cl. 203 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 12, 2011
A railroad may obtain authorization by filing with the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”) a standard abandonment application under 49 U.S.C. § 10903 or by seeking an exemption under 49 U.S.C. § 10502 . See Caldwell v. … In Weir v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedChapman Law Firm, LPA v. United States
113 Fed. Cl. 555 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 25, 2013
Q: Would an inspector for an initial property inspection or a routine home inspection actively search for termites by going into crawl spaces, attics, prying away baseboards, looking under floor boards with flashlights? … See id. at 525-26 (quoting Kellogg Brown & Root Servs, Inc. v. United States, 99 Fed.Cl. 488, 498 (2011), aff'd, 728 F.3d 1348 (Fed.Cir.2013)). The facts in the case before the court are similar to the facts of Alcatec.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSotera Defense Solutions, Inc. v. United States
118 Fed. Cl. 237 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 13, 2014
Emma V. Broomfield, Steffen G. Jacobsen, and Dana E. … Power & Light Co. v. Lorion, 470 U.S. 729, 743-44 (1985); Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142 (1973)).
Cited 18 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 27, 2026
She also cites Worcester v. … See Brown v. Bd. of Ed. of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483, 493 (1954) (“[E]ducation is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments.”); Treviño v. United States, 557 F. App’x 995, 998 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna