Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
2.58s
E.S. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 14, 2021
Doe v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. … See Pafford v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 451 F.3d 1352, 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2006); Boatmon v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 941 F.3d 1351, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (quoting Knudsen by Knudsen v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 12, 2013
OAP, 2007 WL 1983780, at *7; see, e.g., Morman v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 10–814V, 2012 WL 1901276, at *3 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. May 7, 2012); King v. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublished67 Fed. Cl. 598 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 29, 2005
See Haines v. … United States, 42 Fed.Cl. 144, 148 (1998) (“The Tucker Act limits the court’s jurisdiction to non-tort money suits against the United States ____”); see also Brown v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 11, 2020
See American Savings Bank, F.A. v. United Sates, 98 Fed. Cl. 291 (2011); see also Citizens Fin. Servs. v. United States, 64 Fed.Cl. 498, 504 (2005); California Federal Bank v. U.S., 395 F.3d 1263 (2005). … Relying on Redgrave v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSonoma Apartment Associates v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 2, 2018
Caldwell v. United States, 391 F.3d 1226, 1235 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Four Rivers Invs., Inc. v. United States, 78 Fed. Cl. 662, 664 (2007); Fru-Con Constr. Corp. v. United States, 44 Fed. … Cl. at 664 (quoting Browning Ferris Indus., Inc. & Subsidiaries v. United States, No. 05-738T, 2007 WL 1412087, at *1 (Fed. Cl. May 10, 2007)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedThomas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 7, 2026
Accordingly, I will reduce the sum to be awarded for damages briefing (a total of 26.7 hours, or $11,481.00) by ten percent. 6 Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt) 7 fairly captures the overbilling … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEvideo Owners v. United States
126 Fed. Cl. 95 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2016
On October 21, 2011, an appellate board of the USPTO reversed the patent examiner’s final rejection decision. Id. The amended complaint does not state whether DiDomenico Application 1 is still pending before the USPTO. … V.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHealth Insurance Plan of Greater New York, Inc. v. United States
62 Fed. Cl. 33 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 31, 2004
In Garrett v. … and then held that the jurisdiction of the boards includes what it characterized as a “nonmonetary substitute for monetary relief.”
Cited 12 timesPublishedVanquishworldwide, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 6, 2020
See Arista Records, LLC v. … Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007) (quoting Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 3, 2017
Cooke v. United States, 85 Fed. Cl. 325, 341 (2008). … EEOC v. Aetna Ins.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHelm v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 8, 2025
See, e.g., Rochester v. U.S., 18 Cl. … Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedWood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 21, 2020
Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. … To support this rate, Petitioner cites Avera v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 27, 2021
(accrual date of claim challenging discharge from federal employment not suspended until date when plaintiff discovered via Privacy Act requests that the FBI and Justice Department withheld information from discharge board … ); Braude v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 27, 2021
(accrual date of claim challenging discharge from federal employment not suspended until date when plaintiff discovered via Privacy Act requests that the FBI and Justice Department withheld information from discharge board … ); Braude v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDillenbeck v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 29, 2019
As observed in Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 01-60V, 2005 WL 2659072, at *6-8 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … See, e.g., Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 00-0182V, 2005 WL 2659073, at *9-10 (Fed. Cl. Sept. 21, 2005).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 26, 2017
Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621,624 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Finally, Mr. … J. at 1 n.1, Jarvis v. Colvin, No. TMD 15-2226 (D. Md. Sept. 27,2016), ECF No. 25; Mem. at 1, Jarvis v. Westfield Am.. lnc., No. JKB-15-1808 (D. Md. Sept. 30,2015), ECF No. 24;Mem. Op. at 5, Jarvis v. Gradv Memt..
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPrice v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 2, 2019
Price v. … Price v. HHS, No. 11-442V
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 13, 2022
Brown v. United States, 22 F.4th 1008, 1012 (Fed. Cir. 2022). … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997). 9 The plaintiff also relies on the due process clause of the fifth amendment. (Compl. at 12.)
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2025
United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206, 216 (1983); United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 398 (1987). … App’x at 918 (noting that this Court “has no jurisdiction over criminal matters generally”); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMcDonald v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 2, 2021
Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec'y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … See Rochester v. United States, 18 Cl.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna