Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
2.06s
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 13, 2017
. $ 1491(a)(1); see also Keene Com. v. United States,508 U.S. 200,214 (1993) (..[T]ort cases are outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims . . . .,'); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d,621,623 (Fed. … United States v. Sherwood,312 U.S. 584,588 (1941); Brown, 105F.3d,at624. The Court therefore lacks jurisdiction over the claims Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 11, 2020
See American Savings Bank, F.A. v. United Sates, 98 Fed. Cl. 291 (2011); see also Citizens Fin. Servs. v. United States, 64 Fed.Cl. 498, 504 (2005); California Federal Bank v. U.S., 395 F.3d 1263 (2005). … Relying on Redgrave v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2025
United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206, 216 (1983); United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 398 (1987). … App’x at 918 (noting that this Court “has no jurisdiction over criminal matters generally”); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedVanquishworldwide, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 6, 2020
See Arista Records, LLC v. … Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007) (quoting Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 8, 2017
Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (quoting Dorl v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 626, 633, cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1032 (1973)) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Porter v. … The court does not serve as a “super corrections board.” Skinner v. United States, 594 F.2d 824, 830 (Ct. Cl. 1979).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEvideo Owners v. United States
126 Fed. Cl. 95 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2016
On October 21, 2011, an appellate board of the USPTO reversed the patent examiner’s final rejection decision. Id. The amended complaint does not state whether DiDomenico Application 1 is still pending before the USPTO. … V.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHealth Insurance Plan of Greater New York, Inc. v. United States
62 Fed. Cl. 33 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 31, 2004
In Garrett v. … and then held that the jurisdiction of the boards includes what it characterized as a “nonmonetary substitute for monetary relief.”
Cited 12 timesPublishedSonoma Apartment Associates v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 2, 2018
Caldwell v. United States, 391 F.3d 1226, 1235 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Four Rivers Invs., Inc. v. United States, 78 Fed. Cl. 662, 664 (2007); Fru-Con Constr. Corp. v. United States, 44 Fed. … Cl. at 664 (quoting Browning Ferris Indus., Inc. & Subsidiaries v. United States, No. 05-738T, 2007 WL 1412087, at *1 (Fed. Cl. May 10, 2007)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAureus Asset Managers, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 26, 2015
Ten days earlier, an ANO terrorist named Omar Rezaq and two other ANO terrorists traveled from Beirut to Athens with illegal passports and boarded EgyptAir Flight 648 on the day of the flight. Id. ¶ 17. … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-56 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 3, 2017
Cooke v. United States, 85 Fed. Cl. 325, 341 (2008). … EEOC v. Aetna Ins.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPrice v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 5, 2018
Price v. … Price v. HHS, No. 11-442V
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLindholm v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 9, 2020
. §15(e)(1); Avera, 515 F.3d at 1352; Shaw, 609 F.3d at 1372; Woods v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs, 105 Fed. Cl. 148 (2012), at 154; Friedman v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 94 Fed. Cl. 323, 334 (2010); Doe 21 v. … Wilkerson is board certified in both pediatrics and neurology. Id. at 1. Dr. Wilkerson is also a member of numerous medical societies and has published scientific papers. Id. at 3. Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 27, 2021
(accrual date of claim challenging discharge from federal employment not suspended until date when plaintiff discovered via Privacy Act requests that the FBI and Justice Department withheld information from discharge board … ); Braude v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 27, 2021
(accrual date of claim challenging discharge from federal employment not suspended until date when plaintiff discovered via Privacy Act requests that the FBI and Justice Department withheld information from discharge board … ); Braude v.
Cited 0 timesPublished69 Fed. Cl. 566 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 3, 2006
Edison Co. v. … See Barrentine v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 13, 2022
Brown v. United States, 22 F.4th 1008, 1012 (Fed. Cir. 2022). … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997). 9 The plaintiff also relies on the due process clause of the fifth amendment. (Compl. at 12.)
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBerenji v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 24, 2019
He is board-certified in internal medicine, allergy and clinical immunology. Id. at 2. … He is board-certified in internal medicine and rheumatology. Id.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcDonald v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 2, 2021
Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec'y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … See Rochester v. United States, 18 Cl.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPrepejchal v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 5, 2019
. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 v. … Tollefson is a board-certified Pediatric Dermatologist at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMullins v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 4, 2024
Sept. 8, 2011) (ADEM post-DTaP vaccination); Althen, 418 F.3d at 1282 (affirming lower court’s finding of preponderant evidence that tetanus toxoid caused ADEM and optic neuritis); Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. … Similarly, in Brown, the petitioner received an influenza vaccine before he developed sinusitis one month later and an upper respiratory infection three weeks later. Brown, 2011 WL 5029865, at *1.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna