Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

0.99s

  • Agee v. United States

    77 Fed. Cl. 84 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 23, 2007

    The Court is barred from adjudicating retirement benefit claims when the underlying dispute rests on personnel action subject to OPM administration, and Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) review. See Lindahl v. … See Armitage v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hogan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 21, 2017

    Saxton v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521-22 (Fed. Cir. 1993); see also Hines v. … He is board certified in pediatrics and is a current attending physician in pediatric hematology/oncology at Mount Sinai Hospital. Id. at 1. The undersigned finds that an hourly rate of $500 is reasonable given Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. v. United States

    116 Fed. Cl. 708 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2014

    Furthermore, in September 1921, the Navy sent an expeditionary force on board the U.S.S. … Brown, and numerous other communications since that date, up to and including its letter of July 1, 1934, to Mr. Vernon Le Young Ardiff (811.014/295).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hitkansut LLC, a Michigan Corporation, & Acceledyne Technologies, Ltd., LLC, a Michigan Corporation v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 28, 2013

    Baldrige v. … Lamie v. United States Tr., 540 U.S. 526, 534 (2004); see also In re Any & All Funds or Other Assets in Brown Bros. Harriman & Co. Account No. 8870792 in Name of Tiger Eye Invs., Ltd., 601 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zanzarella v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 15, 2025

    Under the Trails Act, a railroad may initiate abandonment proceedings of a rail line before the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”). 49 U.S.C. § 10903; see 16 U.S.C. § 10502. … United States v. Va.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2017

    Stevenson v. … Lampe v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 219 F.3d 1357, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2000). The Supreme Court’s opinion in Daubert v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matten v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 3, 2021

    Palevsky is a board-certified pediatrician and a diplomate of the American Board of Integrative Holistic Medicine. … Palevsky is a member of the Medical Advisory Board for the National Vaccine Information Center. See Fresco v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 06-469, 2013 WL 364723 at *17 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MONTE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 31, 2024

    He is licensed to practice medicine in New York, New Jersey, and Florida, and is board certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, with added qualifications in clinical neurophysiology, and American Board … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242 (1993) (“[w]hen an expert assumes facts that are not supported by a preponderance of the evidence, a finder of fact may properly reject the expert’s opinion”)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Anderson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 24, 2025

    Avera v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 515 F.3d 1343, 1347–48 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (quoting Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 888 (1984)). … Presault v. United States, 52 Fed. Cl. 667, 670 (2002): Perreira v. Sec’y of Dep’t of Health & Hum. Servs., 27 Fed. Cl. 29, 34 (1992).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Interstate General Government Contractors, Inc. v. United States

    42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,314 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 16, 1998

    Co. v. United States, 886 F.2d 1296,1299 (Fed.Cir.1989). … Co. v. United States, 187 Ct.Cl. 45, 57 , 408 F.2d 424, 431 (1969).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Demes v. United States

    52 Fed. Cl. 365 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2002

    See McGregor v. … The issue for decision in that case was whether federal law preempted state law for purposes of plaintiff’s claim for mismanagement by the bank’s board of directors. Id. at *1 .

    Cited 121 timesPublished
  • Wood v. United States

    91 Fed. Cl. 569 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 30, 2009

    Smith v. … See Hamilton v. Brown, 39 F.3d 1574, 1581 (Fed.Cir.1994); Fed. Cir. R. 32.1(d). Although pursuant to Fed. Cir.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United States

    104 Fed. Cl. 368 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 2, 2012

    Plaintiffs also contend that a member of the board of directors of Compusearch was formerly an executive with SRA, creating or manifesting at minimum, a significant potential conflict of interest. … The Compusearch corporate information (marked AR 1175-76, ECF No. 88-5, a two-page web page screen shot from May 23, 2006), identifies members of the board of directors, including Edward E.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Hansen Bancorp, Inc. v. United States

    53 Fed. Cl. 92 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 26, 2002

    Brooktree Corp. v. … United States v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Lost Tree Village Corporation v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 14, 2017

    Ct. 2325 (2017) (“Lost Tree V”). … See Hubbard v. United States, 480 F.3d 1327, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (citing Hensley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sanchez v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 13, 2020

    Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621 , 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (citing 28 U.S .C. § 1491(a)) ("The Court of Federal Claims is a court oflimitedjurisdiction. … See Leber v. United States, 2019 WL 6700257, at *3 (Fed. Cl. Oct. 24, 2019) (quoting Lord Noble Kato Bakari El v. United States, 127 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Albemarle Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United States

    118 Fed. Cl. 549 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 20, 2014

    Cl. 423, 427 n.3 (2010) (citing Brown & Williamson, Ltd. v. United States, 231 Ct. … United States v. Hughes Props., Inc., 476 U.S. at 600 (quoting Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193, 200 (1934)); see also Dixie Pine Prods.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bannum, Inc. v. United States

    119 Fed. Cl. 291 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 5, 2014

    Corp. v. … Cir. 1996) (holding that Board of Contract Appeals should defer to agency’s best value decision as long as it is “grounded in reason . . . even if the Board itself might have chosen a different bidder”);

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 1, 2021

    Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 141 S. Ct. 1474, 1480 (2021); see also Williams v. … Groff v. United States, 493 F.3d 1343, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (quoting Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 311 (1979)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Guardian Moving and Storage Co., Inc. v. United States

    122 Fed. Cl. 117 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 10, 2015

    Tech. & Applications Corp. v. United States, 316 F.3d 1312, 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2003). See also Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United States, 575 F.3d 1352, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2009); Rex Serv. Corp. v. … The Source Selection Evaluation Board (“SSEB”) concluded that MVS’s responses to the evaluation notices were acceptable. AR Tab 71 at 2404.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.