Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

1.28s

  • Rice v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 18, 2026

    See, e.g., Brown v. Wickey, No. 4:25-CV-01045-JSD, 2025 WL 3227553, at *2 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 19, 2025). … See, e.g., Bradford v. Kummerfeld, No. 5:19cv143, 2020 WL 6482980, at *1 (E.D. Tex., May 13 (2020) (citing West v. Bornunda, 698 F. App’x 224 (5th Cir. 2017)); United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kellett v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 12, 2021

    See also Turpin v. Sec'y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99- 564V, 2005 WL 1026714, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Russian Recovery Fund Limited v. United States

    122 Fed. Cl. 600 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 12, 2015

    See Russian Recovery Fund Ltd. v. United States, 90 Fed. … This is laid out in Commissioner v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Buser v. United States

    85 Fed. Cl. 248 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 12, 2009

    Bowen v. Massachusetts, 487 U.S. 879 , 905 & n. 40, 108 S.Ct. 2722 , 101 L.Ed.2d 749 (1988); accord Brown v. … See Artuso, 80 Fed.Cl. at 338 n. 1; Skillo v. United States, 68 Fed.Cl. 734 , 740 n. 11 (2005). Furthermore, the United States Court of Claims, in Brown & Williamson, Ltd. v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Sufi Network Services, Inc. v. United States

    124 Fed. Cl. 511 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 7, 2015

    Auth. v. United States, 129 F.3d 1226, 1232 (Fed. Cir. 1997)). … Discussion This case is part of a much larger series of administrative appeals and breach of contract actions spanning ten years of litigation, in which there have been thirteen decisions from the Armed Services Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Osi, Inc. v. United States

    73 Fed. Cl. 39 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 8, 2006

    United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206, 212 , 103 S.Ct. 2961 , 77 L.Ed.2d 580 (1983); see also Fisher v. United States, 402 F.3d 1167, 1172 (Fed.Cir.2005); Boling v. … Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fullard v. United States

    78 Fed. Cl. 294 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 31, 2007

    Reynolds v. Army & Air Force Exch. Serv., 846 F.2d 746, 747 (Fed.Cir.1988). C. The Tucker Act The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction. Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997). … Lowe v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Howarth v. United States

    41 Fed. Cl. 160 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 17, 1998

    See Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 812 F.2d 1387, 1390-91 (Fed.Cir.1987) (citing Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik AG v. … Various other former VAMC Allen Park employees are plaintiffs in another case pending in this court, Brown v. United States, No. 95-634C. .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chergi v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 27, 2014

    Hampel v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 235, 237 (2011) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976)). … LeBlanc v. United States, 50 F.3d 1025, 1028 (Fed. Cir. 1995). The Court lacks jurisdiction over Mr. Chergi’s allegation that he is the victim of malicious prosecution and other tortious conduct. Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Vladimir Kogan, Md v. the United States of America 1

    112 Fed. Cl. 253 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 27, 2013

    “Special pay was composed of various categories including: full-time status, tenure, board certification, geographic location, . . . and Scarce Specialty Pay.” Def.’s Mot. 2-3. … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986); Mann v. United States, 334 F.3d 1048, 1050 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 4, 2022

    Co. v. … of Contract Appeals (“Board”). 380 F.3d at 1354.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pollack v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 14, 2025

    Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments. … Attorney Jessica Wallace and the Siri & Glimstad, LLP firm have previously received across the board fees reduction for similarly inefficient billing practices. See Garrett v. Sec'y of Health & Hum.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Loyd v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 1, 2021

    He is board certified in pediatrics and allergy and immunology, and has been in practice as an allergist/immunologist since 2004. Tr. at 163; MacGinnitie CV at 10. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242 (1993) (“[w]hen an expert assumes facts that are not supported by a preponderance of the evidence, a finder of fact may properly reject the expert’s opinion”)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Senate Builders and Construction Managers, Inc. v. United States

    131 Fed. Cl. 719 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 29, 2017

    The report for the boring at the other building site left the soil classification section blank, but indicated that the soil was brown gravel, with some sand, little silt, and 13% fines. DA at 23. … Mac, Inc. v. United States, 153 F.3d 1338, 1345 (Fed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Oracle America, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 26, 2019

    Co., Inc. v. Caldera, 192 F.3d 987, 994 (Fed. Cir. 1999). … V. The CO Rationally Set The Competitive Range.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Miles v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 7, 2025

    v. … See 28 U.S.C. 8 § 1491(a)(1); Brown, 105 F.3d at 623; Joshua, 17 F.3d at 379; Shearin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lofton v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 27, 2026

    See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (“The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction.”). … Cir. 1987)); see also Howard-Pinson v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 551, 553 (2006) (citing Haines v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lavezzo v. United States

    74 Fed. Cl. 502 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 7, 2006

    See Roseburg Lumber Co. v. … Crawford is notarized by Thelma Brown, also a U.S. Government employee. Pltf. App., Crawford Decl., Attachment V. Mr. Crawford asserts that he sent the proposed final decision to Ms. Thomas and Mr.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lw Construction of Charleston, LLC v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2018

    See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir.) (holding that taxpayer’s claim for a “fraudulent assessment” is “grounded upon fraud,” and, thus, a tort claim), reh’g denied (Fed. Cir. 1997); Kant v. … .”); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d at 623 (“The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction. It lacks jurisdiction over tort actions against the United States.”); Bobka v. United States, 133 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Group Seven Associates, LLC v. United States

    68 Fed. Cl. 28 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 23, 2005

    The advantage of this option is that all people to support WHS at the start of the base period are on board and working together as a full team. … This court in Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.