Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.86s
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 6, 2022
Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997). … Brown v. United States, 74 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTechnology Innovation Alliance LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 25, 2020
These were the Innovation Evaluation Board (“IEB”), the Past Performance Evaluation Board (“PPEB”), the Problem Statement Evaluation Board (“PSEB”), the Small Business Evaluation Board (“SBEB”), and the Price Evaluation Board … v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 7, 2025
Naskar v. United States, 82 Fed. Cl. 319, 320 (2008) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972)). … United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588 (1941). Thus, this court does not have jurisdiction over cases against individual federal officials, states, or state officials. Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNorthrop Grumman Corp. v. United States
47 Fed. Cl. 20 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 16, 2000
Bedar of Marine Corps Tactical Systems Support Activity (“MCTSSA”) was a member of the Cost Evaluation Board. The Technical Evaluation Board (the “TEB”), composed of Maj. Guy, Maj. Bedar, Col. Robert Speights, and Col. … V.
Cited 44 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 17, 2015
Jordan v. United States, 205 Ct. … See Orloff v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished47 Fed. Cl. 821 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 6, 2000
Co. v. … Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321, 327 , 118 S.Ct. 2028 , 141 L.Ed.2d 314 (1998) (quoting Browning-Ferris Indus, of Vt., Inc. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished63 Fed. Cl. 363 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 29, 2004
Mudge next retained an attorney and sought relief from the General Accounting Office, the Merit Systems Protection Board, and the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”), which claims were denied between 1995 and 1999. … V at V-l.
Cited 4 timesPublished70 Fed. Cl. 81 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 28, 2006
Plaintiff argues that defendant’s theory was not substantially justified because the Navy failed to follow its own regulations and comply with the law regarding the Board of Corrections of Naval Records. … Devine v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedPhoenix Petroleum Co. v. United States
42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,301 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 11, 1998
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA”) upheld the termination on appeal. See id. … See Bernaugh v. United States, 38 Fed.Cl. 538, 544 (1997); see also Chandler v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedWestfed Holdings, Inc. v. United States
55 Fed. Cl. 544 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 17, 2003
Bank FSB v. … See Lloyd v.
Reversed in part, on other grounds by Westfed Holdings, Inc. v. United States, 407 F.3d 1352 (2005)Cited 27 timesPublishedCogan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 2, 2025
Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … Special masters are permitted to use their discretion to take an across-the-board reduction in appropriate circumstances. See Humphries v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 17-288V, 2021 WL 5444097, at *5 (Fed. Cl.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCapreal, Inc. v. United States
99 Fed. Cl. 133 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 6, 2011
See Preseault v. … In Agostini v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedErvin & Associates, Inc. v. United States
44 Fed. Cl. 646 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 1999
After determining that plaintiffs’ proposal was in the competitive range HUD’s Source Evaluation Board recommended that plaintiffs be awarded a Due Diligence II contract. … Dunlap, in contravention of HUD procedures, overruled the Board’s recommendation and awarded the contract to another team. According to plaintiffs, this team was not a qualifying firm.
Cited 9 timesPublishedSmart Business Machines v. United States
72 Fed. Cl. 706 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 9, 2006
Penny Co. v. … Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCw Government Travel, Inc., D/B/A Cwtsatotravel v. United States
110 Fed. Cl. 462 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 11, 2013
The SSAC also concluded that the Source Selection Evaluation Board’s (“SSEB”) determination—that the evaluated IV&V -7- security deficiency and CWT’s numerous significant … With respect to price, the SSA noted that the Price Evaluation Board found “Concur’s price assumptions to be fair and reasonable,” whereas “some” of CWT’s “price assumptions [were] reasonable.” Id.
Cited 82 timesPublishedNifakos v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 12, 2021
While acknowledging that he is listed as a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for this organization, Dr. … Shoenfeld testified that he “never attended a board [meeting], and . . . was not involved in any decision of the board.” Id. at 76. When asked about funding from Ms. Dwoskin and her organization, Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublished27 Fed. Cl. 615 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 5, 1993
Angarica v. … Stated in slightly different terms, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has written: [wjhere an employee is provided a means of redress under CSRA, that is, an appeal to the Board, the employee does
Cited 8 timesPublishedApuzzo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 4, 2026
Saxton v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521 (Fed. Cir. 1993); see also Hines ex rel. Sevier v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 22 Cl. … See, e.g., Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 22-80V, 2026 WL 1005041, at *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Mar. 17, 2026); Greenberg v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 20-1493V, 2026 WL 926153, at *2 (Fed. Cl.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedRemington Arms Company, LLC v. United States
126 Fed. Cl. 218 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 30, 2016
The proposals were evaluated and incorporated into the Source Selection Evaluation Board (“SSEB”) Final Report. See AR 3300-86. … V.
Cited 9 timesPublished107 Fed. Cl. 436 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 18, 2012
Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 812 F.2d 1387, 1390 (Fed.Cir.1987) (citing United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 , 82 S.Ct. 993 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962); SRI Int’l v. Matsushita Elec. … See Machado v. Southern Pac. Transp.
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna