Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
2.03s
White & Case LLP v. United States
89 Fed. Cl. 12 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 3, 2009
See, e.g., Groff v. … One opinion, Tyson v.
Cited 3 timesPublished47 Fed. Cl. 353 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 16, 2000
New Valley Corp. v. … Brown Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 132 F.3d 724, 734 (Fed.Cir. 1997).
Cited 5 timesPublishedCogan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 2, 2025
Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … Special masters are permitted to use their discretion to take an across-the-board reduction in appropriate circumstances. See Humphries v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 17-288V, 2021 WL 5444097, at *5 (Fed. Cl.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 10, 2020
Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007); see Mone v. United States, 766 F. App’x 979, 986 (Fed. Cir. 2019). … Pueschel v. United States, 297 F.3d 1371, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2002); see also Lindahl v. Office of Pers.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 17, 2020
Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co., 450 U.S. 311 (1981); Caldwell v. United States, 391 F.3d 1226, 1228 (Fed. Cir. 2004). … A railroad under the jurisdiction of the STB cannot discontinue service without the consent of the Board. Caldwell, 391 F.3d at 1228.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Savings Bank, F.A. v. United States
74 Fed. Cl. 756 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 18, 2006
Bank v. United States, 62 Fed.Cl. 6 (2004)[“Ameri can Savings II ”]. … Glendale Federal Bank, FSB v. United States, 378 F.3d 1308, 1313 (Fed.Cir.2004), Bluebonnet Sav. Bank, FSB v. United States, 266 F.3d 1348, 1356-57 (Fed.Cir.2001), Locke v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedThompson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 1, 2022
Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec'y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … Eric Gershwin, who is board certified in internal medicine, allergy and clinical immunology, and rheumatology. See Exs. 7, 28. Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedGinn v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 21, 2021
Huq is a clinical geneticist and a board certified pediatric neurologist at Children’s Hospital of Michigan. Pet. Ex. 13 at 1. … Whitecotton v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 17 F.3d 374 (Fed. Cir. 1994), rev’d on other grounds sub nom., Shalala v. Whitecotton, 514 U.S. 268 (1995); see also Walther v. Sec’y of Health & Hum.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 31, 2023
SEKRI, Inc. v. United States, 152 Fed. Cl. 742 (2021) (“SEKRI I”); SEKRI, Inc. v. United States, 34 F.4th 1063 (Fed. Cir. 2022) (“SEKRI II”); SEKRI, Inc. v. United States, __ Fed. … The plaintiff argues that FPI’s board of directors has not decided to produce the ATAP, and that in the absence of such a board decision, the production of the 3 ATAP by
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSystem Dynamics International, Inc. v. United States
130 Fed. Cl. 499 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 7, 2017
The Source Selection Evaluation Board’s May 9, 2016 Initial Evaluation. On May 9, 2016, the Source Selection Evaluation Board (“SSEB”) published an Initial Evaluation Report weighing both proposals. AR at 2753. … In Birch & Davis Int’l, Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublished128 Fed. Cl. 635 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 19, 2016
See Collier v. United States, 56 Fed. Cl. 354, 356-58 (2003), ajf'd, Collier v. United States, 379 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2004). … States v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 21, 2025
See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (“The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction.”). … El Bey v. United States, 152 Fed. Cl. 777, 780 (2021) (quoting Stroughter v. United States, 89 Fed. Cl. 755, 760 (2009)); see Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 677–78; Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBoston Harbor Development Partners, LLC. v. United States
103 Fed. Cl. 499 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 5, 2012
GSA’s Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) evaluated these proposals and visited each of the offered sites to determine if they satisfied the SFO’s requirements. … Holmes v. United States, 657 F.3d 1303, 1319 (Fed.Cir.2011); see also Savan-tage Fin. Servs., Inc. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedAerolease Long Beach v. United States
31 Fed. Cl. 342 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 9, 1994
Indeed, Foote Mineral considered a decision of the Department of the Interior Board of Land Appeals, Black Butte Coal also considered a decision of the Department of the Interior Board of Land Appeals, and Marathon Oil, considered … Corp. v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 284 , 602 F.2d 358 (1979). There, the Court of Claims explained: Plaintiff challenges the determination of the Board, as set forth above, on two bases.
Cited 67 timesPublishedMaritrans Inc. v. United States
43 Fed. Cl. 86 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 11, 1999
United States, 28 F.3d 1171, 1177 (Fed.Cir.1994) (quoting Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Company, 467 U.S. 986, 1005-6 , 104 S.Ct. 2862 , 81 L.Ed.2d 815 (1984) (quoting Webb’s Fabulous Pharmacies v. … Steven Van Dyck is CEO and Chairman of the Board for Maritrans.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGulf Group Inc. v. United States
61 Fed. Cl. 338 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 16, 2004
board,” as such functions are "generally not considered to be inherently governmental.” 48 C.F.R. § 7.503 (d)(14) (2003). . … See, e.g., Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v.
Cited 110 timesPublishedRocky Mountain Helium, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2019
RCFC 54(b); see Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. v. … Yuba Natural Res., Inc, v. United States, 904 F.2d 1577, 1583 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished120 Fed. Cl. 533 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 19, 2015
In addition, you may appeal to the Board if you believe that the proper procedures for terminating a probationary employee have not been followed. … Merit Systems Protection Board, an SF-50 “is merely an administrative record of the accomplished action.” 13 F.3d 1571, 1575 (Fed.Cir.1994).
Cited 4 timesPublishedNorby Lumber Co. v. United States
46 Fed. Cl. 47 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 4, 2000
The contract involved the harvest and sale of 2,060 thousand board feet of merchantable timber, plus significant volumes of lodgepole pine and cull logs, in the Pineridge Ranger District of the Sierra National Forest in Region … See United States v. Mitchell, 445 U.S. 535, 538 , 100 S.Ct. 1349 , 63 L.Ed.2d 607 (1980); United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 398 , 96 S.Ct. 948 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976); James M. Ellett Constr. Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished360training.com, Inc. v. United States
111 Fed. Cl. 356 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 7, 2013
Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1173 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (quoting Spencer v. NLRB, 712 F.2d 539, 557 (D.C. Cir. 1983)). … See Hopi Tribe v. United States, 55 Fed.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna