Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

3.18s

  • Simmons v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 6, 2015

    He is board-certified in allergy and immunology. Id. at 4. He is past president of the American College of Allergy and Immunology. Id. at 6. He is on the editorial board of Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Id. … Shyface v. Sec’y of HHS 165 F.3d 1344, 1352 (Fed. Cir. 1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Waleryszak v. Secretary of the Department Health & Human Services

    45 Fed. Cl. 573 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 15, 1999

    See Bradley v. … He is also licensed by the Florida State Board of Medicine and has had numerous faculty appointments at various universities teaching pediatrics. Dr.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • PMTech, Inc. v. United States

    95 Fed. Cl. 330 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 20, 2010

    Co. v. … Board) or the public at large.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • El Bey v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 26, 2021

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-78 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997). As such, any claim against these individuals would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mendiola v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 6, 2016

    Matthews v. … See 28 U.S.C. $ 13a6(b)(1); see also Brown v. United States,74Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • weston/bean Joint Venture v. United States

    123 Fed. Cl. 341 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 11, 2015

    On the board from Bean were Mr. Taylor, President, and James Bean, Jr., Vice President of C.F. Bean, Bean’s parent company. JS ¶ 14; DX 47 at 2-3 ¶ 4.1; Taylor Tr. 55:17- 21. Reporting to the board were Mr. … The board did not discuss the possibility of submitting a differing site condition claim during that meeting because, although the board “believed [WBJV] was experiencing a differing site condition,” the board did not know

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Maxberry v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 8, 2017

    See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. … Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion, 470 U.S. 729, 743 (1985) (quoting Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142 (1973)). For this reason, the court's review of the Army Boards' decisions regarding Mr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United States

    120 Fed. Cl. 17 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 29, 2015

    Only this court (or a contract board) possesses jurisdiction to entertain a CDA claim. … . § 7104 (affording contractor the option of appealing a contracting officer’s decision to either an agency board or this court).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • JZ Buckingham Investments LLC v. United States

    78 Fed. Cl. 15 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 9, 2007

    See, e.g., Allen County v. Reilly Indus., Inc., 197 F.R.D. 352, 353 (N.D.Ohio 2000); Cook v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 132 F.R.D. 548 (E.D.Cal.1990); Olin Corp. v. Ins. Co. of N. … Jade Trading, LLC v. United States, 65 Fed.Cl. 188, 190 (Fed.C1.2005) (quoting Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 392 F.3d 812 , 818 (5th Cir.2004)); see also Morrow v. Air Ride Techs., Inc., No.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • System Planning Corp. v. United States

    95 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 6, 2010

    A contractor may file suit in this court in lieu of appealing the decision of the CO to an agency board. 41 U.S.C. § 609 (a)(1). B. … .”); Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Cmty. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kennedy v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 19, 2018

    In its entirety, that statute (which was last amended in 193 5) provides: Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to … Brown v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 546, 550 (2006). The failure of even one of these elements renders transfer improper. Transferring Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. United States

    106 Fed. Cl. 467 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 29, 2012

    V. … Brown and W.A. Newsom, Sr. 25. Neville Brown 27. Charles Buring 28. Sarah Virginia Burks 29. Bryan Capooth 35. Richard A. Corbett 36. CT Rowland Properties, LLC 37. Colleen K. Daut 38. Jack V. Delany 41. D. Lee Dunn 42.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Young v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 8, 2016

    The Board found that Rev. … . § 1201, such claims "do not accrue until the appropriate board either finally denies such a claim or refuses to hear it." Real v. United States, 906 F.2d 1557, 1560 (Fed. Cir. 1990); see also Chambers v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Demutiis v. United States

    48 Fed. Cl. 81 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 23, 2000

    Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291-92 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965) (reviewing courts must not "rubber-stamp ... administrative decisions that they deem inconsistent with a statutory mandate or that frustrate the congressional … In Davis v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Pevar Co. v. United States

    40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,764 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 7, 1995

    stated that it would “welcome a decision by the court that defendant is right and a proper claim was not submitted to the contracting officer because plaintiff could then renew its claim and appeal to the Armed Services Board … V 1993); Nussinow v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 556, 559 (1991). .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Jeffries v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 29, 2024

    See Brown v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 19-1564V, 2024 WL 3276785 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. June 7, 2024). The rates requested for Mr. … Under such circumstances, I am empowered to make limited, across-the-board cuts to a fees request, since not all were “reasonably” incurred. See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Hampel v. United States

    97 Fed. Cl. 235 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 18, 2011

    After more than seven years of litigation before the Board of Veterans Appeals and the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, Plaintiff’s claims were ultimately denied. … See Henke v.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Richmond American Homes of Colorado, Inc. v. United States

    75 Fed. Cl. 376 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 22, 2007

    V. … V.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Boeing Co. v. United States

    39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,663 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 25, 1994

    Corp. v. … In any event, that practice is not universal among the boards.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Spahn v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 10, 2017

    Moran * v. … Burk Jubelt is a board-certified neurologist and professor of neurology, microbiology/immunology, and neuroscience at SUNY Upstate Medical University.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.