Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
2.50s
Tompkins v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
117 Fed. Cl. 713 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 27, 2014
See generally, Tompkins v. Sec’y of HHS, No. 261 V, 2013 WL 3498652 at *2-10 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … Id. at 5 (quoting Althen v.
Cited 54 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 7, 2021
See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (“The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction.”). … Anderson v. United States, 117 Fed. Cl. 330, 331 (2014) (citing Sherwood, 312 U.S. at 588; Brown, 105 F.3d at 624; and Smith v. United States, 99 Fed. Cl. 581, 583–84 (2011)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 29, 2019
Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States, 552 U.S. 130, 133-34 (2008); see also MacLean v. United States, 454 F.3d 1334, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (quoting Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. … Mildenberger v. United States, 643 F.3d 938, 945 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMary B. Stanton v. United States
111 Fed. Cl. 263 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 31, 2013
Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142 (1973). … Bateson v. United States, 48 Fed. Cl. 162, 165 (2000). III.
Cited 3 timesPublishedZambelli v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 2, 2024
Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec'y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … Eric Gershwin, a board-certified rheumatologist, and two reports from Dr. Mahbubul Huq, a board-certified neurologist. Exs. 18, 20, 102, 109, 113.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPrecision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United States
81 Fed. Cl. 733 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 2, 2008
V. … Co. v.
Reversed in part by Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United States, 596 F.3d 817 (2010)Cited 10 timesPublishedHardy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 12, 2016
Cl. 401 (2012); Browning v. HHS, No. 07-453V, 2010 WL 4359237 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Sept. 27, 2010); Brown v. HHS, No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Mar. 11, 2005); Smith v. … Cave is board-certified only in the area of family practice. (2015 WL 7732603 at *16.) Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublished99 Fed. Cl. 239 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2011
On August 16, 1999, MES appealed the termination for default to the USPS Board of Contract Appeals (“USPS BCA”). Compl. ¶ 8. … Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 22, 2025
Mar. 4, 2025) (citing Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. … .”); Brown, 105 F.3d at 623 (“Because monetary damages are not available for a Fourth Amendment violation, the Court of Federal Claims does not have jurisdiction over such a violation.”); Smith v. United States, 36 F.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCity of Wilmington, Delaware v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 8, 2021
Zip-O-Log Mills, Inc. v. United States, 113 Fed. Cl. 24, 32 (2013); but see King v. United States, 119 Fed. … Co. v. United States, 2004 WL 1535686, at *2 (Fed. Cl. Jun. 28, 2004) (quoting Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 587 (1993)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSls Federal Services, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 10, 2023
In the Evaluation Board’s report, it disclosed that the only corrective step it took was to remove an “inappropriate CPARS evaluation.” AR 11417. … Team, LLC v. United States, 124 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 26, 2021
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-78 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997). As such, any claim against these individuals would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 18, 2018
James v. Caldera, 159 F.3d 573, 580 (Fed. … These include the Fourth Amendment, Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed Cir. 1997); the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination, Betz v. United States, 40 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMatos v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services
30 Fed. Cl. 223 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 22, 1993
Yachts America, Inc. v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 278, 281 , aff'd, 779 F.2d 656 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied sub nom., Wilson v. United States, 479 U.S. 832 , 107 S.Ct. 122 , 93 L.Ed.2d 68 (1986), citing United States v. … Id.; see Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board, 453 F.2d 645, 650 (1st Cir.1972). Petitioner asserted that the Federal Circuit’s decision in Schumacher v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedAmerican Savings Bank, F.A. v. United States
98 Fed. Cl. 291 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 1, 2011
PX 1862 (Draft Mem. from Dochow to the Bank Board) at WOR466 0018-19. Mr. … Bank v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedInnovair Aviation, Ltd. v. United States
72 Fed. Cl. 415 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 31, 2006
See Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington, 538 U.S. 216, 235 , 123 S.Ct. 1406 , 155 L.Ed.2d 376 (2003) (finding the per se rules a “better fit” than the ad hoe analysis). … In Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAmerican Renovation & Construction Co. v. United States
45 Fed. Cl. 44 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 22, 1999
Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. United States, 811 F.2d 586, 592 (Fed.Cir.1987). In Santa Fe Engineers, Inc. v. … Rig Masters, Inc. v. U.S., 42 Fed.Cl. 369 (1998).
Cited 4 timesPublishedWaleryszak v. Secretary of the Department Health & Human Services
45 Fed. Cl. 573 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 15, 1999
See Bradley v. … He is also licensed by the Florida State Board of Medicine and has had numerous faculty appointments at various universities teaching pediatrics. Dr.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2024
Claims for disability retirement pay, however, accrue upon issuance of “[t]he decision by the first statutorily authorized board that hears or refuses to hear the claim.” Chambers v. … Plaintiffs may challenge civilian review board’s administrative decisions in federal district courts pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act. See Schmidt v. United States, 89 Fed. Cl. 111, 125 (2009).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMaco Bancorp, Inc. v. United States
44 Fed. Cl. 367 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 22, 1999
In October 1988, Maco acquired New First Federal in a series of interlocking agreements by and among Maco, Capital Federal, Old First Federal, FSLIC, and the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB). … See California Federal Bank v. United States, 39 Fed.Cl. 753, 767-68 (1997). 5) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count III of plaintiff s complaint.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna