Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
2.10s
Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District v. United States
61 Fed. Cl. 624 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 18, 2004
. § 258e-l); Formanek v. … See Kansas v.
Cited 18 timesPublished125 Fed. Cl. 4 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 8, 2016
On March 23, 2015, the court consolidated Alford et al. v. United States with Chaney v. United States. See Order, Alford et al., ECF No. 20. … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Of course, jurisdiction is a term that means “limitation.” No court has infinite power. All jurisdiction is limited.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 2, 2017
Inc. v. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 22, 2017
Inc. v. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublished57 Fed. Cl. 319 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 18, 2003
United States v. Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 27 , 68 S.Ct. 376 , 92 L.Ed. 442 (1948); see also United States v. Kirby, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 482, 486-87 , 19 L.Ed. 278 (1868); Comm. to Preserve American Color Television v. … Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 3, 2015
Folden v. United States, 379 F.3d 1344, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2004); see also Metabolite Labs. Inc. v. Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings, 370 F'3d 1354, 1369 (Fed. … (internal quotation marks omitted)); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEsterhill Boat Service Corp. v. United States
91 Fed. Cl. 483 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 28, 2010
The contracting officer eliminated Impresa’s proposal based on the technical board’s determination that it was unacceptable. … The technical board had been particularly concerned about Impresa’s management. Impresa Construz-ioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States, 44 Fed.Cl. 540, 551 (1999).
Cited 12 timesPublishedBayship Management, Inc. v. United States
43 Fed. Cl. 535 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 16, 1999
Merit Systems Protection Board, 978 F.2d 679, 686 (Fed.Cir.1992) (“ ‘[jurisdiction’ is a term that is one of the most slippery in the legal lexicon”). … Southwest Marine of San Francisco, Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedReturn Mail, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 24, 2021
This motion adds to a procedural history that has generated opinions in related proceedings from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, the Federal Circuit, and the Supreme Court. … Cellcast Techs., LLC v. United States, 2019 WL 5959571, at *4 (Fed. Cl. Oct. 30, 2019) (citing Keranos, LLC v. Silicon Storage Tech., Inc., 797 F.3d 1025, 1035 (Fed. Cir. 2015); O2 Micro Int’l Ltd. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 29, 2025
See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (“The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction.”). … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); cf. Tort, Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 2017
Inc. v. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 18, 2016
With respect to his disability benefits claim, the United States argues that this court lacks jurisdiction because he has not presented the claim to a military board. Id. at 6 (citing Chambers v. … Alford filed roughly 30 applications with the Board for Correction of Naval Records ("Board" or "Navy Correction Board"). See Alford v. United States, 123 Fed. Cl. 62, 64 n.4 (2015) ("Alford VF').
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedStockton East Water District and Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District v. United States
109 Fed. Cl. 460 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 28, 2013
Water Dist. v. … Bank, F.S.B. v. United States, 339 F.3d 1341, 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (“Bluebonnet V”).
Cited 7 timesPublished110 Fed. Cl. 306 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 1, 2013
Id. at 1345 (omission in original) (quoting Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1456 (Fed.Cir.1997)). In Tamerlane, Ltd. v. … See Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d at 1456.
Cited 11 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 10, 2014
Stephenson v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 186, 190 (2003) (emphasis in original) ; see also United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. at 588; Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir.), reh'g denied (Fed. … Cir. 1998); Brown v. United States , 105 F.3d 621 , 623 (Fed. Cir.) , reh'g denied (Fed . Cir. 1997); Golden Pac. Bancorp v. United States , 15 F.3d 1066, 1070 n.8 (Fed .
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited Partition Systems, Inc. v. United States
90 Fed. Cl. 74 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2009
United took an appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA” or “Board”), where the key question was whether the Air Force’s contracting officer had authority to act on the claims. … See Short Bros., PLC v.
Cited 8 timesPublished74 Fed. Cl. 709 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2006
(emphasis added)); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997) (holding that the United States Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction over claims sounding in tort, including fraud). … (emphasis added)); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997) (holding that the United States Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction over claims sounding in tort, including fraud).
Cited 2 timesPublishedM. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
133 Fed. Cl. 78 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2017
He is currently licensed to practice medicine in Maryland, and has board certifications in child neurology, although he has not renewed his board certification in pediatrics. Tr. at 88. … Doctor Wiznitzer also serves as a journal reviewer and on two editorial boards (the Lancet Neurology and the Journal of Child Neurology). Id. at 245–46.
Cited 7 timesPublishedHumphries v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 22, 2021
The final sums to be awarded them are consistent with what they received in the interim award, and I make no adjustments (other than the across-the-board adjustment set forth below) to the time they billed. IV. … Special masters need not engage in a line-by-line review of fees requests when making reductions, and in fact are permitted to make fair across-the-board cuts. Hammitt v. Sec’y of Health & Hum.
Cited 0 timesPublishedY and J Properties, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 22, 2017
Inc. v. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna