Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.08s
Hi-Shear Technology Corp. v. United States
53 Fed. Cl. 420 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 29, 2002
The board found that there was no central point to obtain accurate predictions of orders by ordering agencies. … The Board found that the vice president’s statements were unpei’suasive and disregarded them. Id.
Cited 20 timesPublished105 Fed. Cl. 81 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 14, 2012
Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)); see also United States v. … Peanut Farmers v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIndian Harbor Insurance v. United States
100 Fed. Cl. 239 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 5, 2011
Assn. v. … See United States v.
Reversed on other grounds by Indian Harbor Insurance v. United States, 704 F.3d 949 (2013)Cited 3 timesPublishedD&J Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 4, 2022
Healthcare, Inc. v. United States, 137 Fed. … Thus, the regulation expressly allows the SSA to rely on the board’s findings, so long as those findings are sufficiently documented. See Akal Sec., Inc. v. United States, 103 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished69 Fed. Cl. 336 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 16, 2005
De Leon’s contention that a different result is compelled by the Court of Claims’ holding in Brown v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 343 , 358 F.2d 1002 (1966), is without merit. … The United States Supreme Court in Keene Corp. v. United States, 508 U.S. 200 , 217 n. 12, 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993), expressly overruled Brown .
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 31, 2024
The Board was directed to reconsider Mr. … Id. at 5–6 (citing, inter alia, Tippins v. United States, 149 Fed. Cl. 556, 561 (2020)); see also Pl.’s Reply in Supp. of Mot. for Leave, ECF No. 65 at 2–3.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedWackenhut Services, Inc. v. United States
85 Fed. Cl. 273 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 15, 2008
The Source Evaluation Board’s Initial Evaluations.....................280 D. The Source Evaluation Board’s Final Determinations...................281 1. … The Source Evaluation Boards Duties.
Cited 27 timesPublishedBronson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 29, 2025
Rochester v. … Feb. 17, 2016); Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 09-0426V, 2013 WL 1790212, at *3-4 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Apr. 8, 2013). Yet she shows no signs of attempting to modify them.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2018
See Steel Co. v. … See Dew v.
Cited 0 timesPublished60 Fed. Cl. 39 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 29, 2004
American Telecom Corp. v. … Moody & Co., Inc. v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 70, 72 (1984).
Cited 9 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2018
Additionally, the United States District Court for the Central District of California found that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Sherman v. Merit Svstems Protection Board, 530 F. … under procedures prescribed by the Board.").
Cited 0 timesPublished33 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 25, 1993
court explicitly overruled the eases that judicially created exceptions to § 1500 (many of which are relied upon by plaintiff here), specifically: Boston Five Cents Savings Bank, 864 F.2d 137 ; Hossein, 218 Ct.Cl. 727 ; Brown … v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 1, 2023
The Board, in a May 31, 2018 decision, allowed the municipalities to pursue such railbanking. … In Emeny v.
Cited 0 timesPublished74 Fed. Cl. 554 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 22, 2006
Ctr. v. … Nonetheless, handlers do have the option of selling their reserve almonds in non-competitive markets, subject to conditions set by the Board. 7 C.F.R. § 981.67 ; see also Cal-Almond, Inc. v.
Cited 8 timesPublished64 Fed. Cl. 403 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 16, 2005
Brown v. Legal Found, of Washington, 538 U.S. 216, 233 , 123 S.Ct. 1406 , 155 L.Ed.2d 376 (2003) (citations omitted) (quoting Tahoe-Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. … See Brown v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 22, 2022
See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (“The Tucker Act grants the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction over suits against the United States, not against individual federal officials”). … Brown v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 546, 550 (2006) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1631).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 18, 2020
See 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (conferring upon the court jurisdiction to hear certain claims “not sounding in tort”); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. … Brown v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 546, 550 (2006) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1631).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBriggs v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 7, 2024
No. 21-0697V ERIN BRIGGS, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: January 5, 2024 v. … Katrina Sandifer Brown, Brown Bass & Jeter, PLLC, Jackson, MS, for Petitioner. Alexa Roggenkamp, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,343 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 21, 1998
Corp. v. … In Harbert/Lummus Agrifuels Projects, et al. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished46 Fed. Cl. 414 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 29, 2000
See Bradley v. School Board of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974). … See Loving v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna