Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
2.13s
Mora v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
122 Fed. Cl. 199 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 20, 2015
In that regard, the Court finds unavailing petitioner’s heavy reliance upon the Federal Circuit’s decision in Herring v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 778 F.3d 1011 (Fed. … The issue in Herring was whether the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) erred in dismissing the petitioner’s appeal as untimely filed.
Cited 9 timesPublishedEP Productions, Inc. v. United States
63 Fed. Cl. 220 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2004
The contracting officer’s resulting decision to award the contract to A-S-K was approved by SDDC’s Executive Review Board on June 25,2004. … The Board determined that the technical portion of the BAFO of one of the contractors, Government Technology Services, Inc.
Cited 48 timesPublishedAmerican Auto Logistics, Lp v. United States
117 Fed. Cl. 137 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2014
According to a TRANSCOM “SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB) TEAM TRAINING” document, a Source Selection Evaluation Board was to first conduct initial evaluations in order to establish a competitive range. … NVT Techs., Inc. v. United States, 370 F.3d at 1159 (citing Interwest Constr. v. Brown, 29 F.3d 611, 614 (Fed. Cir. 1994)).
Cited 26 timesPublished122 Fed. Cl. 581 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 30, 2015
See Ramos v. United States, 112 Fed. … Cl.576, 578 (1997) (noting that the less stringent standard "does not allow a plaintiff to wholly disregard the timetable set by the court's rules, messages left by the court, or a show cause order"); see also Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedConsolidation Coal Co. v. United States
64 Fed. Cl. 718 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 4, 2005
Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 , 25 U.S. 419, 444 , 6 L.Ed. 678 (1827). … In Moon v. Freeman, the Ninth Circuit confronted the issue head-on and rejected an argument that the Export Clause is “an across-the-board limitation on the commerce power as well as the taxing power ----” Moon v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedRyco Construction, Inc. v. United States
55 Fed. Cl. 184 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 23, 2002
Brown Constructors, Inc. v. … Brown, 132 F.3d at 733 . 8 E.
Cited 11 timesPublishedUnited Launch Services, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 12, 2018
Revisions Made By the Contract Management Board of Review In November 2006, the government convened a contract management board of review (Review Board) to consider whether executing the proposed advance agreements … Thor Power Tool Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished74 Fed. Cl. 717 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2006
(citations omitted); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (1997); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Nat’l City Bank v. … United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Alves v. Unit ed States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublished115 Fed. Cl. 739 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 2014
See Kandel v. United States, Case No. 06-872 (originally styled Solow v. United States). … While COLA increases occurred across-the-board, locality pay increases “were different in each of the geographical areas.” See Pls.’ PSJ Mem. 3 n.3.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHealthestate, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 10, 2020
In First Nat’l S.S., the Court considered whether the United States Shipping Board and the United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corporation (among other parties) were acting under the authority of the United States … Merchant Fleet Corp. v. Harwood, 281 U.S. 519 (1930). Shortly after the United States entered the war, the President conferred his war powers on the Fleet Corporation, through the Shipping Board, by executive order.
Cited 0 timesPublished45 Fed. Cl. 771 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 14, 2000
See Boyles v. … See Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135 , 152 S.W.2d 649 (1941). See also Quinn v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 439 S.W.2d 533 (Mo.1969) (railroad depot within scope of easement).
Cited 39 timesPublishedOptimization Consulting, Inc. v. United States
115 Fed. Cl. 78 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 28, 2014
In Archura LLC v. … Bliss Co. v. United States, 77 F.3d 445, 449 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Galen Med. Asso., Inc. v. United States, 369 F.3d 1324, 1330 (Fed.
Cited 15 timesPublished106 Fed. Cl. 300 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2012
Wilner v. … Matteson, Inc. v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedMorse Diesel International, Inc. v. United States
74 Fed. Cl. 601 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 26, 2007
See Todd v. … Bank, FSB v.
Cited 3 timesPublished31 Fed. Cl. 520 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 1, 1994
Total Medical Management, Inc. v. United States, 29 Fed. Cl. 296, 299 (1993) (quoting Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 978 F.2d 679, 686 (Fed.Cir.1992)); accord Adam v. … In Janowsky v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedOrbis Sibro, Inc. v. United States
117 Fed. Cl. 446 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 18, 2014
Henderson v. Shinseki, 131 S. Ct. 1197, 1202 (2011); see also Hertz Corp. v. … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555-56 (citing Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 508 n.1 (2002)))); Scheuer v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLuther Brady Tansil v. United States
113 Fed. Cl. 256 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 30, 2013
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2006)). … “[S]eeking redress of one’s rights at a corrective board is probative evidence that an individual is not under a legal disability.” Coon, 30 Fed. Cl. at 540.
Cited 1 timesPublished129 Fed. Cl. 539 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 8, 2016
Order, Beberman v. v. United States Dep't of Stqte, No.2014-0020 (D.V.l. Nov. 8, 2016). Ms. Beberman filed a fifth amended complaint on the same day. Fifth Amended Complaint, Beberman v. … See, e.g., Low v. United States,90 Fed.
Cited 5 timesPublished52 Fed. Cl. 374 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2002
Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1456 (Fed.Cir.1997). A continuing claim requires recurring, “individual actionable *379 wrongs.” Brown Park Estates, 127 F.3d at 1459. … Brown Park Estates, 127 F.3d at 1456. See also Ariadne, 133 F.3d at 879 .
Cited 16 timesPublishedThompson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 20, 2022
Michael Johnson Dunn Brown, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. … Brown MICHAEL J. BROWN Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna