Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,304 results
1.49s
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 2, 2025
See also Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 436, 442–43 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Morse v. … See Crawford v. Tilley, 15 F.4th 752, 759 (6th Cir. 2021) (“The general rule is that filing an amended complaint moots pending motions to dismiss.”); Parry v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown939 F. Supp. 2d 805 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 3, 2013
“The most basic of [First Amendment] principles is this: ‘[A]s a general matter, ... government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content.’ ” Brown v. … Brown, 131 S.Ct. at 2738 (internal citations omitted). Specifically, “the court should ask whether the challenged regulation is the least restrictive means among available, effective alternatives.” Ashcroft v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 11, 2020
Hill v. Lappin, 630 F.3d 468, 470–71 (6th Cir. 2010) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). … Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989), nor can the Court “create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading.” Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting Clark v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 17, 2020
Real, 471 U.S. 491, 495–99 (1985) (disciplinary board need not make contemporaneous record of reasons live witnesses for inmate not allowed); Baxter v. … Brown, 62 F.3d 789, 790-91 (6th Cir. 1995) (stating that, after Sandin, it became clear that mandatory language in prison regulations does not create a liberty interest protected by the due process clause); Upshaw v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 30, 2025
In Preiser v. … And, in Edwards v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 16, 2026
(quoting Griffith, 987 F.3d at 564 (quoting Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1174 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (Roberts, J.))). … Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1173 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (Roberts, J.) (quoting Beck v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMcLemore v. Third National Bank in Nashville
136 B.R. 727 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 13, 1992
In re Royal Golf Products, 908 F.2d 91 (6th Cir.1990); Brown v. … Brown v. First Nat’l Bank of Little Rock, 748 F.2d 490 n. 6 (8th Cir.1984); “[t]he existence of this control determines whether the payments were preferential transfers.... ” Smyth v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPhoenix Restaurant Group, Inc. v. Proficient Food Co. (In Re Phoenix Restaurant Group, Inc.)
373 B.R. 541 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 8, 2007
Browning v. Levy, 283 F.3d 761 , 775 (6th Cir.2002). But see Lewis v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 141 Fed.Appx. 420, 423-424 (6th Cir. 2005) (standard of review is abuse of discretion). … The doctrines of res judicata and judicial estoppel did not preclude this action Citing Browning v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 24, 2025
See Brown v. United States, 602 U.S. 101, 105 (2024). The Court held that a “state drug conviction counts as an ACCA predicate if it involved a drug on the federal schedules at the time of that offense.” Id. at 123. … United States v. Wilkes, 133 F.4th 600, 604 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 145 S. Ct. 2785 (2025) (quoting Brown, 602 U.S. at 113-14) (internal citations omitted); see also United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMercer v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 7, 2024
See, e.g., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1176-79 (6th Cir. 1983). … See Brown.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 8, 2026
Lee v. Mackie, No. 2:15-CV-12, 2015 WL 1040272, at *2 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 10, 2015) (citing Wilkinson v. … App’x at 175 (citing Brewer v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGaines v. Excel Industries, Inc.
667 F. Supp. 569 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 20, 1987
See Latham v. … The subsidiary’s board of directors is composed entirely of persons who also are members of Industries’ board. Both parent and subsidiary are covered by the same workers compensation and general liability insurer.
Cited 19 timesPublishedZimmer v. City of Murfreesboro
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 14, 2025
See Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Mich., Inc., 236 F.3d 299, 306 (6th Cir. 2000). … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 201 F.2d 819, 822 (6th Cir. 1953) (citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Nov 22, 2019
United States v. Curtis, 237 F.3d 598, 603 (6th Cir. 2001). General or conclusory objections are insufficient. See Zimmerman v. Cason, 354 F. Appx. 228, 230 (6th Cir. 2009). … No. 24) filed by Defendant Tennessee Board of Parole is GRANTED, and the Tennessee Board of Parole is TERMINATED as a defendant in this action. It is so ORDERED.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 19, 2026
Shane Grp., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Shane Grp., Inc., 825 F.3d at 305 (quoting Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1179).
Cited 0 timesUnknownLee v. The Vanderbilt University
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 27, 2022
Finally, Plaintiff concludes the Motion to Alter or Amend by stating, “[b]y not dismissing with leave to amend, the Court clearly erred by not following Brown v Matauszak, 415 F. … Further, the plaintiff in Brown had not been given any prior opportunities to amend, while Plaintiff here already has amended the Complaint twice. Perkins v. Am. Elec.
Cited 0 timesUnknownO'Connor v. The Lampo Group, LLC
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 18, 2022
See, e.g., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1176-79 (6th Cir. 1983). … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983).
Cited 0 timesUnknownChapman v. MeHarry Medical College School of Medicine
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 12, 2021
Rodgers v. Banks, 344 F.3d 587, 595 (6th Cir. 2003). … Bible Believers v. Wayne Cty., Mich., 805 F.3d 228, 242 (6th Cir. 2015); Wexler v. White’s Fine Furniture, Inc., 317 F.3d 564, 570 (6th Cir. 2003).
Cited 0 timesUnknown735 F. Supp. 246 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 11, 1989
In compelling arbitration of these claims, the Court follows its earlier decision in Goldstein v. J.C. Bradford & Co., No. 3-88-0600 (M.D.Tenn. June 30, 1989), and the decision of Judge Meredith in Wilkerson v. J.C. … The Ninth Circuit cases cited by plaintiff, Gooding v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc., [current] Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) ¶ 94,489 (June 23, 1989); Van Ness Townhouses v. Mar Indus. Corp., 862 F.2d 754 (1988); Leicht v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDawley v. Acme Block & Brick, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 7, 2020
Id. at 1050 (citing Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 201 F.2d 819, 822 (6th Cir. 1953)). … Trade Comm’n v. Stratford Career Inst., No. 16-CV-371, 2016 WL 3769187, at *2 (N.D. Ohio July 15, 2016) (quoting Brown, 201 F.2d at 822)); see also Kavalec, 2020 WL 1694560, at *4.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna