Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstnmd

2,304 results

1.49s

  • Wilson v. Wright

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 2, 2025

    See also Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 436, 442–43 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Morse v. … See Crawford v. Tilley, 15 F.4th 752, 759 (6th Cir. 2021) (“The general rule is that filing an amended complaint moots pending motions to dismiss.”); Parry v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Backpage.Com, LLC v. Cooper

    939 F. Supp. 2d 805 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 3, 2013

    “The most basic of [First Amendment] principles is this: ‘[A]s a general matter, ... government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content.’ ” Brown v. … Brown, 131 S.Ct. at 2738 (internal citations omitted). Specifically, “the court should ask whether the challenged regulation is the least restrictive means among available, effective alternatives.” Ashcroft v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Tennessee, State of

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 11, 2020

    Hill v. Lappin, 630 F.3d 468, 470–71 (6th Cir. 2010) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). … Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989), nor can the Court “create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading.” Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting Clark v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hailey v. Singleton

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 17, 2020

    Real, 471 U.S. 491, 495–99 (1985) (disciplinary board need not make contemporaneous record of reasons live witnesses for inmate not allowed); Baxter v. … Brown, 62 F.3d 789, 790-91 (6th Cir. 1995) (stating that, after Sandin, it became clear that mandatory language in prison regulations does not create a liberty interest protected by the due process clause); Upshaw v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gunn v. Core Civic

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 30, 2025

    In Preiser v. … And, in Edwards v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cardona

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 16, 2026

    (quoting Griffith, 987 F.3d at 564 (quoting Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1174 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (Roberts, J.))). … Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1173 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (Roberts, J.) (quoting Beck v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McLemore v. Third National Bank in Nashville

    136 B.R. 727 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 13, 1992

    In re Royal Golf Products, 908 F.2d 91 (6th Cir.1990); Brown v. … Brown v. First Nat’l Bank of Little Rock, 748 F.2d 490 n. 6 (8th Cir.1984); “[t]he existence of this control determines whether the payments were preferential transfers.... ” Smyth v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Phoenix Restaurant Group, Inc. v. Proficient Food Co. (In Re Phoenix Restaurant Group, Inc.)

    373 B.R. 541 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 8, 2007

    Browning v. Levy, 283 F.3d 761 , 775 (6th Cir.2002). But see Lewis v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 141 Fed.Appx. 420, 423-424 (6th Cir. 2005) (standard of review is abuse of discretion). … The doctrines of res judicata and judicial estoppel did not preclude this action Citing Browning v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Ramey v. United States

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 24, 2025

    See Brown v. United States, 602 U.S. 101, 105 (2024). The Court held that a “state drug conviction counts as an ACCA predicate if it involved a drug on the federal schedules at the time of that offense.” Id. at 123. … United States v. Wilkes, 133 F.4th 600, 604 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 145 S. Ct. 2785 (2025) (quoting Brown, 602 U.S. at 113-14) (internal citations omitted); see also United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mercer v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 7, 2024

    See, e.g., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1176-79 (6th Cir. 1983). … See Brown.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Page

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 8, 2026

    Lee v. Mackie, No. 2:15-CV-12, 2015 WL 1040272, at *2 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 10, 2015) (citing Wilkinson v. … App’x at 175 (citing Brewer v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gaines v. Excel Industries, Inc.

    667 F. Supp. 569 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 20, 1987

    See Latham v. … The subsidiary’s board of directors is composed entirely of persons who also are members of Industries’ board. Both parent and subsidiary are covered by the same workers compensation and general liability insurer.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Zimmer v. City of Murfreesboro

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 14, 2025

    See Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Mich., Inc., 236 F.3d 299, 306 (6th Cir. 2000). … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 201 F.2d 819, 822 (6th Cir. 1953) (citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Valentine v. Ford

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Nov 22, 2019

    United States v. Curtis, 237 F.3d 598, 603 (6th Cir. 2001). General or conclusory objections are insufficient. See Zimmerman v. Cason, 354 F. Appx. 228, 230 (6th Cir. 2009). … No. 24) filed by Defendant Tennessee Board of Parole is GRANTED, and the Tennessee Board of Parole is TERMINATED as a defendant in this action. It is so ORDERED.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wolf

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 19, 2026

    Shane Grp., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Shane Grp., Inc., 825 F.3d at 305 (quoting Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1179).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lee v. The Vanderbilt University

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 27, 2022

    Finally, Plaintiff concludes the Motion to Alter or Amend by stating, “[b]y not dismissing with leave to amend, the Court clearly erred by not following Brown v Matauszak, 415 F. … Further, the plaintiff in Brown had not been given any prior opportunities to amend, while Plaintiff here already has amended the Complaint twice. Perkins v. Am. Elec.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • O'Connor v. The Lampo Group, LLC

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 18, 2022

    See, e.g., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1176-79 (6th Cir. 1983). … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Chapman v. MeHarry Medical College School of Medicine

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 12, 2021

    Rodgers v. Banks, 344 F.3d 587, 595 (6th Cir. 2003). … Bible Believers v. Wayne Cty., Mich., 805 F.3d 228, 242 (6th Cir. 2015); Wexler v. White’s Fine Furniture, Inc., 317 F.3d 564, 570 (6th Cir. 2003).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hurt v. Brinton

    735 F. Supp. 246 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 11, 1989

    In compelling arbitration of these claims, the Court follows its earlier decision in Goldstein v. J.C. Bradford & Co., No. 3-88-0600 (M.D.Tenn. June 30, 1989), and the decision of Judge Meredith in Wilkerson v. J.C. … The Ninth Circuit cases cited by plaintiff, Gooding v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc., [current] Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) ¶ 94,489 (June 23, 1989); Van Ness Townhouses v. Mar Indus. Corp., 862 F.2d 754 (1988); Leicht v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dawley v. Acme Block & Brick, Inc.

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 7, 2020

    Id. at 1050 (citing Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 201 F.2d 819, 822 (6th Cir. 1953)). … Trade Comm’n v. Stratford Career Inst., No. 16-CV-371, 2016 WL 3769187, at *2 (N.D. Ohio July 15, 2016) (quoting Brown, 201 F.2d at 822)); see also Kavalec, 2020 WL 1694560, at *4.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.