Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstnmd

2,304 results

1.71s

  • Kiphart v. Saturn Corp.

    74 F. Supp. 2d 769 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 30, 1999

    Mobley v. Board of Regents of Univ. Sys. of Georgia, 924 F.Supp. 1179, 1189 (S.D.Ga.1996). … Corp., 101 F.3d 519 , 524 (7th Cir.1996) (quoting Byrne v. Board of Educ. Sch. of West Allis-West Milwaukee, 979 F.2d 560, 565 (7th Cir.1992) (citation omitted)). 13 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Maney

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 29, 2025

    Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31 (1992). … Payne v. Secretary of Treasury, 73 F. App’x 836, 837 (6th Cir. 2003). And pro se litigants are not exempt from the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Smith v. United States

    343 F. Supp. 908 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 18, 1971

    United States v. Johnson, 5 Cir., 331 F.2d 943 . … United States v. Johnson, supra; United States v. Haggart, 410 F.2d 449 (C.A. 8, 1969).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Putnam Pit, Inc. v. City of Cookeville

    23 F. Supp. 2d 822 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 21, 1998

    Likewise, in Lehman v. … I think it is a bulletin board about the City of Cooke-ville. "Here we are.” Exhibits (Docket Entry No. 32) tab 3, at 57. 10 . Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gentry v. Tennessee Department of Treasury

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 24, 2024

    in NCBF v. … The Board of Claims denied the request on June 23, 2023, finding that the Clerk was not a state employee for purposes of the claims process. (Id.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Collado v. 21st Judicial District Drug Taskforce

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 18, 2020

    See Harrison v. … Even if the one-year limitations period were tolled while Plaintiff pursued state remedies,2 see Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marshall v. Davis

    526 F. Supp. 325 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 24, 1981

    Shultz v. … United States, 379 U.S. 241 , 85 S.Ct. 348 , 13 L.Ed.2d 258 (1964); Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 , 85 S.Ct. 377 , 13 L.Ed.2d 290 (1964); National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Coutu v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc.

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 13, 2019

    Bartling v. … Plaintiff has not shown that remand to the Benefit Appeals Board would be more than a “useless formality.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Anderson

    271 F. Supp. 3d 950 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 7, 2017

    Fritz v. … Universal Health Servs., Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Owens v. Perry

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Nov 22, 2019

    Uttecht v. Brown, 551 U.S. 1, 10 (2007) (citations omitted). … Brown testified that the victim did not appear depressed shortly before her death.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hudson v. CoreCivic

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 14, 2024

    Brown v. Cracker Barrel Rest., 22 F. App’x 577, 578 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). III. … (citing Darrah v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Venezia v. 12th & Division Properties, LLC

    685 F. Supp. 2d 752 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 9, 2010

    .”); Brown v. Brown, 863 S.W.2d 432, 434 (Tenn.Ct.App.1993) (“Mere expressions of opinion do not give rise to an action of fraud.”). … Sanders v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Newcomb v. Lee

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 18, 2025

    See White by Swafford v. … Diaz v. Mich. Dep’t of Corrs., 703 F.3d 956, 964 (6th Cir. 2013); see, e.g., Carten v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cartwright

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 10, 2026

    See Brown v. Jordan, 563 S.W.3d 196, 200 (Tenn. 2018); Tenn. Op. Att’y Gen. No. 97-098 (July 1, 1997). … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Perry v. CoreCivic

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 16, 2025

    Cole v. Yukins, 7 F. App’x 354, 356 (6th Cir. 2001); see also Langley v. … See, e.g., Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff John C.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Molodetskiy v. Nortel Networks Short-Term & Long-Term Disability Plan

    594 F. Supp. 2d 870 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 20, 2009

    See Smith v. … See Platt v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Westgate Resorts, Ltd. v. Wesley Financial Group, LLC

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 8, 2023

    P. 12(f); see also Fox v. Mich. State Police Dep’t, 173 F. … Operating Eng’rs Local 324 Health Care Plan v. G & W Const. Co., 783 F.3d 1045, 1050 (6th Cir. 2015) (citing Lunsford v. United States, 570 F.2d 221, 229 (8th Cir. 1977); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hollis v. Holloway

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 28, 2025

    Similarly, in Staub v. … See Brown v. Mohr, 2014 WL 1686194, *6 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 29, 2014); Baldwin v. Croft, 2013 WL 172870, *2 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 16, 2013); Ely v. Smith, 2008 WL 2076651, *2 (E.D. Tenn.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Abdur' Rahman v. Bell

    999 F. Supp. 1073 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 8, 1998

    Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530 (Tenn.1992), a case involving jury instructions on these elements. … Jones v. State, 1995 WL 75427 , at *3 (Tenn.Crim.App. Feb.23,1995). *1089 Whether a Brady due process rights violation has occurred presents a mixed question of law and fact which is reviewed de novo. Brown v.

    Vacated on other grounds by Abu-Ali Abdur'rahman, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, 226 F.3d 696 (2000)Cited 15 timesPublished
  • McGrady v. Mattis

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 11, 2019

    See e.g., Parnell v. Stone, 12 F.3d 213 (per curiam) (6th Cir. 1993) (applying the “but for” standard to a federal sector ADEA claim); Browning v. … Id. at 625; see also, Browning v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.