Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,717 results
1.28s
557 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 10, 1982
authority of this Court. 5 *626 “ * * * [TJhere is a duty on the part of federal district judges not to exercise the criminal contempt power without first having considered the feasibility of the alternatives at hand. * * * ” Brown … v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAzzolini v. Corts Trust II For Provident Financial Trust I
396 F. Supp. 2d 858 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 12, 2005
See Novak v. … Generally accepted accounting principles are set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 11, 2019
Clay v. … Brown v. United States, 20 F. App’x 373, 375 (6th Cir. 2001). Respondent also relies on Allen v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 16, 2025
P. 10(c))); see also Brown v. Louisville-Jefferson Cnty. Metro Gov’t, 135 F.4th 1022, 1030 (6th Cir. 2025 (“[W]hen an exhibit contradicts the complaint, the exhibit trumps the allegations.” (citing Kaplan v. … [Id.]; see Shehee v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 15, 2022
Papasan v. … See Wilson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 6, 2023
Gambrel v. Knox Cnty., Ky., 25 F.4th 391, 408 (6th Cir. 2022) (citing Bd. Of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997)). … See Weser v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 14, 2026
See Gibson v. R.G. … Brown v. Hill, 174 F. Supp. 3d 66, 71 (D.D.C. 2016) (quoting Johnson v. Kuehne & Nagel Inc., No. 11-cv-02317, 2012 WL 1022939, at *5 (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 26, 2012)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownTennessee Valley Authority v. Samples
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 19, 2024
McKinley v. Bowlen, 8 F. App’x 488, 491 (6th Cir. 2001). … See Tennessee Valley Auth. v. Jones, 692 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJenkins v. City of Chattanooga
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 29, 2023
Brown v. Battle Creek Police Dep’t, 844 F.3d 556, 573 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Powers v. Hamilton Cty. Pub. Def. Comm’n, 501 F.3d 592, 606– 07 (6th Cir. 2007)). Here, even if a constitutional violation did occur, Ms. … Thomas v. City of Chattanooga, 398 F.3d 426, 429 (6th Cir. 2005) (quoting Doe v. Claiborne Cnty. By & Through Claiborne Cnty.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 30, 2023
Id.; see also Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 436, 442 (6th Cir. 2016) (“Because Rule 15(a)(2) directs courts to ‘freely give leave when justice so requires,’ the rule embodies a ‘liberal amendment policy.’”). … Huckeby v. Spangler, 563 S.W.2d 555, 558–59 (Tenn. 1978). In Metcalfe v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownClayton v. Greater Knoxville Chamber of Commerce
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 10, 2021
Plaintiff applied and interviewed for the position of President and CEO, but on March 26, 2019, the Chamber’s Board of Directors hired Mike Odom (“Odom”) instead [Doc. 28, ¶¶ 252, 253]. … Howe v. City of Akron, 801 F.3d 718, 747-48 (6th Cir. 2015) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownRubenstein v. American Academy of Actuaries
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 17, 2023
Semtek Int’l Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 531 U.S. 497, 508 (2001); Taylor v. … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDECARLO A GARNER, JR. v. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, et al.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 21, 2026
Corzine, No. 08-2265, 2008 WL 2512916, *4 (D.N.J. 2008)); see also Brown v. Chambers-Smith, No. 1:24-CV-690, 2025 WL 1833132, at *3 (S.D. … Lindsay v. Yates, 498 F.3d 434, 438–39 (6th Cir. 2007) (citing Mencer v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownIn Re Southeastern Milk Antitrust Litigation
730 F. Supp. 2d 804 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 4, 2010
Cargill Inc. v. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 324 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). The relevant product market is not at issue in this motion. [11] A geographic market is "an area of effective competition."
Cited 0 timesPublishedJalic, Inc. v. FAO Schwarz, LLC, et al.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 8, 2026
See Sony Corp. of Am. v. … The pommel on Defendant’s wolf sword (right) is deep brown, with a narrow face, recessed small red eyes, an upturned snout, rounded ears, and smooth, brushed-back fur.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFunctional Pathways of Tenn., LLC v. Wilson Senior Care, Inc.
866 F. Supp. 2d 918 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 30, 2012
Ltd. v. … Nucor Corp. v. Bell, 482 F.Supp.2d 714 , 726-27 n. 10 (D.S.C.2007) (citing Southern Contracting, Inc. v. H.C. Brown Constr. Co., Inc., 317 S.C. 95 , 450 S.E.2d 602, 604 (1994)).
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 11, 2021
See, e.g., State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 541–42 (Tenn. 1992). … Evid. 801(c)(2); Browne v. Signal Mountain Nursery, L.P., 286 F. Supp. 2d 904, 924 (E.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJalic, Inc. v. FAO Schwarz, LLC, et al.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 8, 2026
See Sony Corp. of Am. v. … The pommel on Defendant’s wolf sword (right) is deep brown, with a narrow face, recessed small red eyes, an upturned snout, rounded ears, and smooth, brushed-back fur.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJalic, Inc. v. FAO Schwarz, LLC, et al.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 8, 2026
See Sony Corp. of Am. v. … The pommel on Defendant’s wolf sword (right) is deep brown, with a narrow face, recessed small red eyes, an upturned snout, rounded ears, and smooth, brushed-back fur.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 5, 2019
Haines v. … Monell v. Dep’t of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978)); see also Alkire v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna