Case law

Chavez v. State

479 S.W.2d 687 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 15, 1972

See Martinez v. State, 469 S.W.2d 185, at 186 (Tex.Cr.App.1971). The indictment in the case at bar did not allege an actual taking of property from the motor vehicle. Further, in Benedict v. … Appellant relies upon Wilson v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 420 , 328 S.W.2d 305 (1959) and Stallworth v.

Tillis v. State

647 S.W.2d 268 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 23, 1983

In Brown v. … See also Parsons v. State, 513 S.W.2d 554 ; Smith v. State, 527 S.W.2d 896 .

Callaghan v. State

57 Tex. Crim. 314 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 24, 1909

Brown v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 65; La Rose v. State, 29 Texas Crim. App., 215. This was before the amendment of 1899 touching bail bonds. … Woods v. Allen, 98 N. W. Rep., 499 . Finding no error in the proceedings, it is ordered that the judgment be and same is hereby in all things affirmed. Affirmed. Brooks, Judge, absent.

Heinzman v. State

34 Tex. Crim. 76 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 19, 1895

In bar to this prosecution, she set up an agreement made through her attorneys, Jackson & Brown, with the State; they (Jackson & Brown) claiming the right to represent the State, as well as the defendant, in this agreement … Proc., secs. 1164, 1165; Bex v. Lee, Buss. & B., 361; Bex v. Brunton, Id., 454; The People v. Whipple, 9 Cow., 707 .

Crow, Timmie Gene

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 7, 2006

In his application, Applicant contends that he should be eligible for release to mandatory supervision, but Texas prison officials and the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles (Board) are not considering him eligible for such … Penal Code §§ 12.42 (b); 30.02 (a), (c); see also, e.g., Garland v. State , 170 S.W.3d 107 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (discussing enhancement provision).

Thornton, Charles Dewayne

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 22, 2004

See Brown v. Illinois , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261-62 (1975) (temporal proximity between illegal arrest and voluntary confession is relevant consideration in determining whether taint of illegal arrest has been dissipated). … See Nichols v.

Ramos, Daniel John

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 20, 2021

The State requests that the trial court enter an order designating issues and communicate with the Board to address Applicant’s claims. … Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 488 (1972); Ex parte Williams, 738 S.W.2d 257, 259-60 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987). Accordingly, the record should be developed.

Baines v. State

98 Tex. Crim. 124 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 4, 1924

The witness Addie Brown informed the appellant of her conversation with the deceased. After entering the restaurant, appellant asked the deceased if he wanted to see him. … See Winn v. State, 91 Texas Crim. Rep., 455 , 239 S. W. Rep., 947 ; Branch’s Crim. Law, Sec. 445; Jones v. State, 17 Texas Crim. App., '602. The judgment is reversed and.the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Padron, Joe David

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 16, 2025

Padron v. State, No. 13-06-00464-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi del. Aug. 14, 2008) (not designated for publication). … Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Delivered: April 16, 2025 Publish

Young, Blake Edwin AKA Young, Edwin Blake

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 15, 2011

In Evans , this Court adopted the Fifth Circuit's holding in Meza v. Livingston , 607 F.3d 392 (5 th Cir. Tex. 2010). … Coleman v. Dretke , 395 F.3d 216 (5 th Cir. 2004) ( Coleman I ), reh'g and en banc denied , 409 F.3d 665 (5 th Cir. 2005) ( Coleman II ).

Ex parte Hemby

765 S.W.2d 791 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 25, 1989

Williams v. United States, 401 U.S. 646, 653 , 91 S.Ct. 1148, 1152 , 28 L.Ed.2d 388, 395 (1971) (Plurality opinion). See also Brown v. … In Brown v. Louisiana, supra, a plurality of the Court regarded the rule in Burch v.

Stokes v. State

165 Tex. Crim. 269 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 1957

James Albert Brown for an examination who testified that his examination of the prosecutrix revealed that the hymen had been torn, that the vagina had the appearance of that of a married woman and that such condition could … Jack v. State, 20 Texas App. 656; Flanagan v. State, 142 Texas Cr. Rep. 177 , 151 S.W. 2d 803 ; Sandoval v. State, 151 Texas Cr. Rep. 430 , 209 S.W. 2d 188 ; Killingsworth v. State, 154 Texas Cr.

Brown, Aubrey Freeman

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 1, 2008

WR- 70,620-01 EX PARTE AUBREY FREEMAN BROWN, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 05-0168X IN THE 71 ST DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRISON COUNTY Per curiam. … Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke , 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed.

Reyna v. State

477 S.W.2d 564 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 15, 1972

Only recently in Maldonado v. … See also Baldwin v. State, 21 Tex.App. 591 , 3 S.W. 109 (1886) ; Brown v. State, 32 Tex.Cr.R. 119 , 22 S.W. 596 (1893).

White v. State

167 Tex. Crim. 591 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 1959

By motion for new trial appellant claims that he entered the plea of guilty because of certain promises and threats made to him by an agent of the Texas Liquor Control Board. … Williams v. State, 164 Texas Cr. Rep. 137 , 296 S.W. 2d 781 ; Dillon v. State, 165 Texas Cr. Rep. 217 , 305 S.W. 2d 956 , and Hunt v. State, 167 Texas Cr. Rep. 51 , 317 S.W. 2d 743 . The judgment is affirmed.

Chaddock, Ex Parte Jesse

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 27, 2012

.; Weinn v. State, 326 S.W.3d 189, 192 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). 4 State v. Perez, 947 S.W.2d 268, 270 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). 5 284 U.S. 299 (1932); accord Albernaz v. … United States, 450 U.S. 333, 337–38, 340–42 (1981) (multiple punishments); Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 166 & n.6 (1977) (successive prosecutions). 6 Ball v.

Baldwin v. State

153 Tex. Crim. 19 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 1949

In support of what we have said, we refer to the following authorities: Sanchez v. State, 143 Tex. Cr. R. 345 ( 158 S. W. 2d 801 ); Brown v. State, 94 Tex. Cr. R. 140 ( 250 S. W. 170 ); Sedg *22 wick v. State, 57 Tex. … W. 702 ); Mason v. State, 47 Tex. Cr. R. 403 ( 83 S. W. 689 ); and Turner v. State, 24 Tex. App. 12 ( 5 S. W. 511 ). The court did not err in declining to submit appellant’s requested charge.

Chaddock, Ex Parte Jesse

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 27, 2012

See Brown v. Ohio , 432 U.S. 161, 167-69 (1977) ("The greater offense is therefore by definition the 'same' for purposes of double jeopardy as any lesser offense included in it. . . . … Blockburger v.

Chaddock, Ex Parte Jesse

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 27, 2012

v. … .”); see McGee v. State, 909 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Tex. App.

Gonzales v. State

581 S.W.2d 690 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 6, 1979

In Miranda v. … In Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 475 S.W.2d 938 , this Court found that information obtained from the defendant did not come as the result of a custodial interview.