The opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-62,917-02
EX PARTE JOE DAVID PADRON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. CR02004423-F(1) IN THE 214TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM NUECES COUNTY
Per curiam. Yeary, J., filed a dissenting opinion joined by Schenck, P.J., and Finley, J.
OPINION
A jury convicted Applicant of three counts of capital murder. It rejected the death penalty
and assessed three concurrent terms of life in prison. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the
convictions. Padron v. State, No. 13-06-00464-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi del. Aug. 14, 2008)
(not designated for publication). Through habeas counsel, Applicant filed this application for a writ
of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See
TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that he should receive a new trial. The trial court held an evidentiary
hearing. The parties and the trial court agree that habeas relief should be granted based on the State’s
unknowing use of materially false testimony at Applicant’s trial. See Ex parte Weinstein, 421
2
S.W.3d 656 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Relief is granted. The judgment in cause number 02-CR-4423-F in the 214th District Court
of Nueces County is set aside. Applicant shall answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The
trial court shall issue any necessary orders within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.
Delivered: April 16, 2025
Publish